Salty Matters

The Blog is written by me, John Warren. Once every three or four weeks or so I will post an article or two on an evaporite topic that has piqued my interest. On the Saltwork Publications webpage (under "the Works") there is a growing library of pdfs and epubs based on these blogs. These articles on the website have much higher resolution extractable graphics in than in the blog. There is also a link to this set of pdfs and epubs on the home page (www.saltworkconsultants.com).

Brine evolution and origins of potash - primary or secondary. Ancient potash ores: Part 3 of 3

John Warren - Monday, December 31, 2018

Introduction

In the previous two articles in this series on potash exploitation, we looked at the production of either MOP or SOP from anthropogenic brine pans in modern saline lake settings. Crystals of interest formed in solar evaporation pans and came out of solution as: 1) Rafts at the air-brine interface, 2) Bottom nucleates or, 3) Syndepositional cements precipitated within a few centimetres of the depositional surface. In most cases, periods of more intense precipitation tended to occur during times of brine cooling, either diurnally or seasonally (sylvite, carnallite and halite are prograde salts). All anthropogenic saline pan deposits examples can be considered as primary precipitates with chemistries tied to surface or very nearsurface brine chemistry.

In contrast, this article discusses ancient potash deposits where the chemistries and ore textures are responding to ongoing alteration processes in the diagenetic realm. Unlike the modern brine pans where brines chemistries and harvested mineralogies are controllable, at least in part, these ancient deposits show ore purities and distributions related to ongoing natural-process overprints.



Table 1 lists some modern and ancient potash deposits and prospects by dividing them into Neogene and Pre-Neogene deposits (listing is extracted and compiled from SaltWork® database Version 1.7). The Neogene deposits are associated with a time of MgSO4-enriched seawaters while a majority of the Pre-Neogene deposits straddle times of MgSO4 enrichment and depletion in the ocean waters.

Incongruent dissolution in burial

Many primary evaporite salts dissolve congruently in the diagenetic realm; i.e., the composition of the solid and the dissolved solute stoichiometrically match, and the dissolving salt goes entirely into solution (Figure 1a). This situation describes the typical subsurface dissolution of anhydrous evaporite salts such as halite or sylvite. However, some evaporite salts, typically hydrated salts, such as gypsum or carnallite, dissolve incongruently in the diagenetic realm, whereby the composition of the solute in solution does not match that of the solid (Figure 1b). This solubilisation or mineralogical alteration is defined by the transformation of the "primary solid" into a secondary solid phase, typically an anhydrous salt, and the loss of water formerly held in the lattice structure. The resulting solution generally carries ions away in solution.


More than a century ago, van't Hoff (1912) suggested that much subsurface sylvite is the result of incongruent solution of carnallite yielding sylvite and a Mg-rich solution. According to Braitsch (1971, p. 120), the incongruent alteration (dissolution) of carnallite is perhaps the most crucial process in the alteration of subsurface potash salts and the formation of diagenetic (secondary) sylvite.

Widespread burial-driven incongruent evaporite reactions in the diagenetic realm include the burial transition of gypsum to anhydrite (reaction 1)

CaSO4.2H2O --> CaSO4 + 2 H2O ... (1)

and the in-situ conversion of carnallite to sylvite via the loss of magnesium chloride in solution (reaction 2)

KMgCl3.6H2O --> KCl + Mg++ + 2Cl- + 6H2O ...(2)

Typically, a new solid mineral remains, and the related complex solubility equilibrium creates a saline pore water that may, in turn, drive further alteration or dissolution as it leaves the reaction site (Warren, Chapters 2 and 8). Specifically for ancient potash, reaction 2 generates magnesium and chloride in solution and has been used to explain why diagenetic bischofite and dolomite can be found in proximity to newly formed subsurface sylvite. Bischofite is a highly soluble salt and so is metastable in many subsurface settings where incongruent dissolution is deemed to have occurred, including bischofite thermal pool deposits in the Dallol sump in the Danakhil of Ethiopia (Salty Matters, May 1, 2015). In many hydrologically active systems, solid-state bischofite is flushed by ongoing brine crossflow and so help drive the formation of various burial dolomites. Only at high concentrations of MgCl2 can carnallite dissolve without decomposition.

Laboratory determinations

In the lab, the decomposition of carnallite in an undersaturated aqueous solution is a well-documented example of incongruent dissolution (Emons and Voigt, 1981; Xia et al., 1993; Hong et al., 1994; Liu et al., 2007; Cheng et al., 2015, 2016). When undersaturated water comes into contact with carnallite, the rhombic carnallite crystals dissolve and, because of the common ion effect, small cubic KCl crystals form in the vicinity of the dissolving carnallite. As time passes, the KCl crystals grow into larger sparry subhedral forms and the carnallite disappears.

Carnallite’s crystal structure is built of Mg(H2O)6 octahedra, with the K+ ions are situated in the holes of chloride ion packing meshworks, with a structural configuration similar to perovskite lattice types (Voigt, 2015). Potassium in the carnallite lattice can be substituted by other large single-valence ions like NH4+, Rb+, Cs+ or Li(H2O)+, (H3O)+ and Cl- by Br- and I-. These substitutions change the lattice symmetry from orthorhombic in the original carnallite to monoclinic.

When interpreting the genesis of ancient potash deposits and solutions, the elemental segregation in the lattice means trace element contents of bromide, rubidium and caesium in primary carnallite versus sylvite daughter crystals from incongruent dissolution can provide valuable information. For example, in a study by Wardlaw, (1968), a trace element model was developed for sylvite derived from carnallite that gave for Br and Rb concentration ranges of 0.10–0.90 mg/g and 0.01–0.18 mg/g, respectively. In a later study of sylvite derived by fresh-water leaching of magnesium chloride under isothermal conditions at 25 °C. Cheng et al. (2016), defined a model whereby primary sylvites precipitated from MgSO4-deficient sea water, gave Br and Rb concentration ranges of 2.89–3.54 mg/g and 0.017–0.02 mg/g, respectively (no evaporation occurred at saturation with KCl). In general, they concluded sylvite derived incongruently from carnallite would contain less Br and more Rb than primary sylvite (Figure 2; Cheng et al., 2016).


Subsurface examples

The burial-driven mechanism widely cited to explain the incongruent formation of sylvite from carnallite is illustrated in Figure 3 (Koehler et al., 1990). Carnallite precipitating from evaporating seawater at time 1 forms from a solution at 30°C and atmospheric (1 bar) pressure, and so plots as point A, which lies within the carnallite stability field (that is, it sits above the dashed light brown line). With subsequent burial, the pressure increases so that the line defining carnallite-sylvite boundary (solid dark brown line) moves to higher values of K. By time 2, when the pressure is at 1 Kbar (corresponds to a lithostatic load equivalent to 2-3 km depth), the buried carnallite is thermodynamically unstable and so is converting to sylvite + solution (as the plot field now lies in the sylvite + solution field (Figure 3). If equilibrium is maintained the carnallite reacts incongruently to form further sylvite and MgCl2-solution. Thus, provided the temperature does not rise substantially, increasing pressure as a result of burial will favour the breakdown of carnallite to sylvite. However, as burial proceeds, the temperature may become high enough to favour once again the formation of carnallite from sylvite + solution (that is the solution plot point from A moves toward the right-hand side of the figure and back into the carnallite stability field).


Sylvite, interpreted to have formed from incongruent dissolution of primary carnallite, is reported from the Late Permian Zechstein Formation of Germany (Borchert and Muir, 1964), Late Permian Salado Formation of New Mexico (Adams, 1970), Early Mississippian Windsor Group of Nova Scotia (Evans, 1970), Early Cretaceous Muribeca Formation of Brazil and its equivalents in the Gabon Basin, West Africa (Wardlaw, 1972a, b; Wardlaw and Nicholls, 1972; Szatmari et al., 1979; de Ruiter, 1979), Late Cretaceous of the Maha Sarakham Formation, Khorat Plateau, Thailand and Laos (Hite and Japakasetr, 1979), Pleistocene Houston Formation, Danakil Depression, Ethiopia (Holwerda and Hutchinson, 1968), and Middle Devonian Prairie Formation of western Canada (Schwerdtner, 1964; Wardlaw, 1968) (See Table 1).

This well-documented literature base supports a long-held notion that there is a problem with sylvite as a primary (first precipitate) marine bittern salt, especially if the mother seawater had ionic proportions similar to those present in modern seawater (see Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990 for an excellent, if 30-year-old, review). We know from numerous evaporation experiments, that sylvite does not crystallise during the evaporation of modern seawater at 25°C, except under metastable equilibrium conditions (Braitsch, 1971; Valyashko, 1972; Hardie, 1984). The sequence of bitterns crystallising from modern seawater bitterns was illustrated in the previous Salty Matters article in this series (see Figure 1 in October 31 2018).

Across the literature documenting sylvite-carnallite associations in ancient evaporites, the dilemma of primary versus secondary sylvite is generally solved in one of three ways. Historically, many workers interpreted widespread sylvite as a diagenetic mineral formed by the incongruent dissolution of carnallite (Explanation 1). Then there is the interpretation that some sylvite beds, perhaps associated with tachyhydrite, were precipitated in the evaporite bittern part of a basin hydrology that was fed by CaCl2-rich basinal hydrothermal waters (Explanation 2: see Hardie, 1990 for a good discussion    of this mechanism). Then there is the third, and increasingly popular explanation of primary or syndepositional sylvite at particular times in the chemical evolution of the world oceans (MgSO4-depleted oceans).


Changes in the relative proportions of magnesium, sulphur and calcium in the world’s oceans are well supported by brine inclusion chemistry of co-associated chevron halite (Figure 4). Clearly, there are vast swathes of times in the earth’s past when the chemistry of seawater changed so that MgSO4 levels were lower than today and it was possible that sylvite was a primary marine bittern precipitate (see Lowenstein et al., 2014 for an excellent summary).

In my opinion, there is good evidence that all three explanations are valid within their relevant geological contexts but, if used exclusively to explain the presence of ancient sylvite, the argument becomes somewhat dogmatic. I would say that that, owing to its high solubility, the various textures and mineralogical associations of carnallite/sylvite and sulphate bitterns found in ancient potash ore beds reflect various and evolving origins. Ambient textures and mineralogies are dependent on how many times and how pervasively in a potash sequence’s geological burial history an evolving and reactive pore brine chemistry came into contact with parts or all of the extent of highly reactive potash beds (Warren, 2000; 2010; 2016).

In my experience, very few ancient examples of economic potash show layered textures indicating primary precipitation on a brine lake floor, instead, most ancient sylvite ores show evidence of at least one episode of alteration. That is, various forms and textures in potash may dissolve, recrystallise and backreact with each other from the time a potash salt is first precipitated until it is extracted. The observed textural and mineralogical evolution of a potash ore association depends on how open was the hydrology of the potash system at various stages during its burial evolution. The alteration can occur syndepositionally, in brine reflux, or later during flushing by compactional or thermobaric subsurface waters or during re-equilibration tied to uplift and telogenesis. Tectonism (extensional and compactional) during the various stages of a basin’s burial evolution acts as a bellows driving fluid flow within a basin, so forcing and speeding up the focused circulation of potash-altering waters.

 

A similar, but somewhat less intense, textural evolution tied to incongruent alteration is seen in the burial history of other variably hydrated evaporite salts. For example, CaSO4 can flip-flop from gypsum to anhydrite and back again depending on temperature, pore fluid salinity and the state of uplift/burial. Likewise, with the more complicated double salt polyhalite, there are mineralogical changes related to whether it formed in a MgSO4 enriched or depleted world ocean and the associated chemistry of the syndepositional reflux brines across extensive evaporite platforms (for a more detailed discussion of polyhalite see Salty Matters, July 31, 2018). Kainite-kieserite-carnallite also show evidence of ongoing incongruent interactions. This means that, as in gypsum/anhydrite/polyhalite or kain ite/kieserite sequences, there will be primary and secondary forms of both carnallite and sylvite that can alternate during deposition, during burial and any deep meteoric flushing and then again with uplift. In Quaternary brine factories these same incongruent chemical relationships are what facilitate the production of MOP (sylvite) from a carnallitite feed or SOP from kainite/kieserite/schoenite feed (see articles 1 and 2 in this series).

 

To document the three end-members of ancient sylvite-carnallite decomposition/precipitation we will look at three examples; 1) Oligocene potash in the Mulhouse Basin where primary sylvite textures are commonplace, 2) Devonian potash ores in western Canada, where multiple secondary stages of alteration are seen, and 3) Igneous-dyke associated sylvite in east Germany where thermally-driven volatisation (incongruent melting) forms sylvite from dehydrated carnallite.


Oligocene Potash, Mulhouse Basin France

Moving backwards into deep time, this 34 Ma deposit contains some of the first indications of well preserved primary marine-fed sylvinite (MOP) textures exemplified by laterally-continuous mm-scale alternations of potash and halite layers and lamina (Figure 5a-c). Interestingly, all solid-state potash deposits laid down in the post-Oligocene period contain increased proportions of MgSO4 salts, making them much more difficult to economically mine and process (see Table 1 and Salty Matters, May 12, 2015)

From 1904 until 2002, potash was conventionally mined in France from the Mulhouse Basin (near Alsace, France). With an area of 400 km2, the Mulhouse Basin is the southernmost of a number of Lower Oligocene evaporite basins that occupied the upper Rhine Graben, which at that time was a narrow adiabatic-arid rift valley (Figure 6a). The graben was a consequence of the collision between European and African plates during the Paleogene. It is part of a larger intracontinental rift system across Western Europe that extended from the North Sea to the Mediterranean Sea, stretching some 300 km from Frankfurt (Germany) in the north, to Basel (Switzerland) in the south, with an average width of 35 km (Cendon et al., 2008). The southern extent of the graben is limited by a system of faults that place Hercynian massifs and Triassic materials into contact with the Paleogene filling. Across the north, a complex system of structures (including salt diapirs) put the basin edges in contact with Triassic, Jurassic and Permian materials. In the region of the evaporite basins, the Paleogene fill of the graben lies directly on the Jurassic basement. The sedimentary filling of this rift sequence is asymmetrical with the deeper parts located at the southwestern and northeastern sides of the Graben (Rouchy, 1997).


Palaeogeographical reconstructions place the potential marine seaway seepage feed to the north or perhaps also southeast of the Mulhouse Basin, while marginal continental conglomerates tend to preclude any contemporaneous hydrographic connection with Oligocene ocean water (Blanc-Valleron, 1991; Hinsken et al., 2007; Cendon et al., 2008). At the time of its hydrographic isolation, some 34 Ma, the basin was located 40° north of the equator. Total fill of Oligocene lacustrine/marine-fed sediments in the graben is some 1,700m thick. The saline stage is dominated by anhydrite, halite and mudstone. The main saline sequence is underlain by non-evaporitic Eocene continental mudstones, with lacustrine fossils and local anhydrite beds. Evaporite bed continuity in the northern part of the basin is disturbed by (Permian-salt cored) diapiric and or erosional/fault movement. Consequently, these northern basins are not considered suitable for conventional potash mining (Figure 6a).

The Paleogene fill of the basin is divided into 6 units; a pre-evaporitic series, Lower Salt Group (LSG), Middle Salt Group (MSG), an Upper Salt Group (USG - with potash), Grey Marls Fm., and the Niederroedern Fm (Figure 7; Cendon et al., 2008). The LSG and lower section of the MSG are interpreted as lacustrine in origin, based on the limited palaeontologic and geochemical data. However, based on the presence of Cenozoic marine nannoplankton, shallow water benthic foraminifera, and well-diversified dinocyst assemblages in the fossiliferous zone below Salt IV, Blanc-Valleron (1991) favours a marine influence near the top of the MSG, while recognising the ambiguity of marine proportions with brackish faunas. Many marine-seepage fed brine systems have salinities that allow halotolerant species to flourish in marine-fed basins with no ongoing marine hydrographic connection (Warren, 2011). According to Blanc-Valleron and Schuler (1997), the region experienced a Mediterranean climate with long dry seasons during Salt IV member deposition.


In detail, the Salt IV member is made up of some 210 m of evaporitic sequence, with two relatively thin potash levels (Ci and Cs). The stratigraphy associated with this potash zone is, from base to top (Figure 7):

S2 Unit: 11.5 m thick with distinct layers of organic-rich marls, often dolomitic, with dispersed anhydrite layers.

S1 Unit: 19 m thick, evenly-bedded and made up of alternating metre-scale milky (inclusion-rich) halite layers, with much thinner marls and anhydrite layers. Marls show a sub-millimetric lamination formed by micritic carbonate laminae alternating with clay, quartz, and organic matter-rich laminae. Hofmann et al. (1993a, b) interpreted these couplets as reflecting seasonal variations. Anhydrite occasionally displays remnant swallowtail ghost textures, which suggest that at least part of the anhydrite first precipitated as subaqueous gypsum. Halite shows an abundance of growth-aligned primary chevron textures, along with fluid-inclusion banding suggesting halite was subaqueous and deposited beneath shallow brine sheets (Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990).

S Unit: Is 3.7 m thick and consists of thin marl layers and anhydrite, similar to the S2 Unit, with a few thin millimetric layers of halite.

Mi Unit: With a thickness of 6 m, it is mostly halite with similar characteristics to the S1 Unit. Sylvite was detected in one sample, but its presence is probably related to the evolution of interstitial brines (Cendon et al., 2008).

Ci Unit (“Couche inférieure”): Is formed by 4 m of alternating marls/anhydrite, halite, and sylvite beds (Figure 7).

The Ti unit consists of alternating beds of halite, marl and anhydrite. The top of the interval is the T unit, which is similar to the S unit and consists of alternating beds of marl and anhydrite. Above this is the Ms or upper Marl, near identical to the lower marl Mi. The Mi is overlain by the upper potash bed (Cs), a thinner, but texturally equivalent, bed compared to the sylvinitic Ci unit.

Thus, the Oligocene halite section includes two thin, but mined, potash zones: the Couche inferieure (Ci; 3.9m thick), and Couche superieure (Cs; 1.6m thick), both occur within Salt IV of the Upper Salt group (Figures 5, 7).

Both potash beds are made up of stacked, thin, parallel-sided cm-dm-thick beds (averaging 8 cm thickness), which are in turn constructed of couplets composed of grey-coloured halite overlain by red-coloured sylvite (Figure 5b). Each couplet has a sharp base that separates the basal halite from the sylvite cap of the underlying bed. In some cases, the separation is also marked by bituminous partings. The bottom-most halite in each dm-thick bed consists of halite aggregates with cumulate textures that pass upward into large, but delicate, primary chevrons and cornets. Clusters of this chevron halite swell upward to create a cm-scale hummocky boundary with the overlying sylvite (Figure 5c; Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990).

The sylvite member of a sylvinite couplet consists of granular aggregates of small transparent halite cubes and rounded grains of red sylvite (with some euhedral sylvite hoppers) infilling the swales in the underlying hummocky halite (Figure 5b,c). The sylvite layer is usually thick enough to bury the highest protuberances of the halite, so that the top of each sylvite layer, and the top of the couplet, is flat. Dissolution pipes and intercrystalline cavities are noticeably absent, although some chevrons show rounded coigns. Intercalated marker beds, formed during times of brine pool freshening, are composed of a finely laminated bituminous shale, with dolomite and anhydrite.

The sylvite-halite couplets record combinations of unaltered settle-out and bottom-nucleated growth features, indicating primary chemical sediment accumulating in shallow perennial brine pools (Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990). Based on the crystal size, the close association of halites with sylvite layers, their lateral continuity and the manner in which sylvite mantles overlie chevron halites, the sylvites are interpreted as primary precipitates. Sylvite first formed at the air-brine surface or within the uppermost brine mass and then sank to the bottom to form well-sorted accumulations. As sylvite is a prograde salt it, like halite, probably grew during times of cooling of the brine mass (Figure 8a). These times of cooling could have been diurnal (day/night) or weather-front induced changes in the above-brine air temperatures. Similar cumulate sylvite deposits form as ephemeral bottom accumulations on the floor of modern Lake Dabuxum in China during its more saline phases.


The subsequent mosaic textural overprint seen in many of the Mulhouse sylvite layers was probably produced by postdepositional modification of the crystal boundaries, much in the same way as mosaic halite is formed by recrystallisation of raft and cumulate halite during shallow burial. Temperature-based inclusion studies in both the sylvite and the halites average 63°C, suggesting solar heating of surface brines as precipitation took place (Figure 8b; Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990). Similar high at-surface brine temperatures are not unusual in many modern brine pools, especially those subject to periodic density stratification and heliothermometry (Warren 2016; Chapter 2).

Mineralogically, potash evaporites in the Mulhouse Basin in the Rhine Graben (also known as the Alsatian (Alsace) or Wittelsheim Potash district) contain sylvite with subordinate carnallite, but lack the abundant MgSO4 salts characteristic of the evaporation of modern seawater. The Rhine graben formed during the Oligocene, via crustal extension, related to mantle upwelling. It was, and is, a continental graben typified by high geothermal gradients along its rift axis. In depositional setting, it is not dissimilar to pree-120,000-year potash fill stage in the Quaternary Danakil Basin or the Dead Sea during deposition of potash salts in the Pliocene Sedom Fm. The role of a high-temperature geothermal inflow in defining the CaCl2 nature of the potash-precipitating brines, versus a derivation from a MgSO4-depleted marine feed, is considered significant in the Rhine Graben deposits, but is poorly understood and still not resolved (Hardie, 1990; Cendón et al., 2008). World ocean chemistry in the Oligocene is on a shoulder between the MgSO4-depleted CaCl2-rich oceans of the Cretaceous and the MgSO4-enriched oceans of the Neogene (Figure 4).


Cendón et al. (2008) conclude brine reaction processes were the most important factors controlling the major-ion (Mg, Ca, Na, K, SO4, and Cl) evolution of Mulhouse brines (Figure 9a-d). A combined analysis of fluid inclusions in primary textures by Cryo-SEM-EDS with sulphate- d34S, d18O and 87Sr/86Sr isotope ratios revealed likely hydrothermal inputs and recycling of Permian evaporites, particularly during the more advanced stages of evaporation that laid down the Salt IV member. Bromine levels imply an increasingly concentrated brine at that time (Figure 9a). The lower part of the Salt IV (S2 and S1) likely evolved from an initial marine input (Figure 9b-d).

Throughout, the basin was disconnected from direct marine hydrographic connection and was one of a series of sub-basins formed in an active rift setting, where tectonic variations influenced sub-basin interconnections and chemical signatures of input waters. Sulphate-d34S shows Oligocene marine-like signatures at the base of the Salt IV member (Figure 9c, d). However, enriched sulphate-d18O reveals the importance of synchronous re-oxidation processes.

As evaporation progressed, other non-marine or marine-modified inputs from neighbouring basins became more important. This is demonstrated by increases in K concentrations in brine inclusions and Br in halite, sulphate isotopes trends, and 87Sr/86Sr ratios (Figure 9b, c). The recycling (dissolution) of previously precipitated evaporites of Permian age was increasingly important with ongoing evaporation. In combination, this chemistry supports the notion of a connection of the Mulhouse Basin with basins situated north of Mulhouse. The brine evolution eventually reached sylvite precipitation. Hence, the chemical signature of the resulting brines is not 100% compatible with global seawater chemistry changes. Instead, the potash phase is tied to a hybrid inflow, with significant but decreasing marine input.

There was likely an initial marine source, but this occurred within a series of rift-valley basin depressions for which there was no direct hydrographic connection to the open ocean, even at the time the Middle Salt Member (potash-entraining) was first deposited (Cendon et al., 2008). That is, the general hydrological evolution of the primary textured evaporites in the Mulhouse basin sump is better explained as a restricted sub-basin with an initial marine-seepage stage. This gradually changed to ≈ 40% marine source near the beginning of evaporite precipitation, with the rest of hydrological inputs being non-marine. There was a significant contribution of solutes from recycled, in part diapiric, Permian evaporites, likely remobilised by the tectonics driving the formation of the rift valley (Hinsken et al., 2007; Cendon et al., 2008). The general proportion of solutes did not change substantially over the time of evaporite precipitation. However, as the basin restriction increased, the formerly marine inputs changed to continental, diapiric or marine-modified inputs, perhaps fed from neighbouring basins north of Mulhouse basin. As in the Ethiopian Danakhil potash-rift, it is likely brine interactions occurred both during initial and early post-depositional reflux overprinting of the original potash salt beds.


West Canadian potash (Devonian)

The Middle Devonian (Givetian) Prairie Evaporite Formation is a widespread potash-entraining halite sequence deposited in the Elk Point Basin, an early intracratonic phase of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin (WCSB; Chipley and Kyser, 1989). Today, it is the world’s predominant source of MOP fertiliser (Warren, 2016). The flexure that formed the basin and its subsealevel accommodation space was a distal downwarp to, and driven by, the early stages of the Antler Orogeny (Root, 2001). Texturally and geochemically the potash layers in the basin show the effects of multiple alterations and replacements of its potash minerals, especially interactions between sylvite and carnallite in a variably recrystallised halite host.

Regionally halite constitutes a large portion of the four formations that make up the Devonian Elk Point Group (Figure 10): 1) the Lotsberg (Lower and Upper Lotsberg Salt), 2) the Cold Lake (Cold Lake Salt), 3) the Prairie Evaporite (Whitkow and Leofnard Salt), and 4) the Dawson Bay (Hubbard Evaporite). Today the remnants of the Middle Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation constitute a bedded unit some 220 metres thick, which lies atop the irregular topography of the platform carbonates of the Winnipegosis Fm. Extensive solutioning of the various salts has given rise to an irregular thickness to the formation and the local absence of salt (Figure 11a).


The Elk Point Group was deposited within what is termed the Middle Devonian “Elk Point Seaway,” a broad intracratonic sag basin extending from North Dakota and northeastern Montana at its southern extent north through southwestern Manitoba, southern and central Saskatchewan, and eastern to northern Alberta (Figure 11a). Its Pacific coast was near the present Alberta-British Columbia border, and the basin was centred at approximately 10°S latitude. To the north and west the basin was bound by a series of tectonic ridges and arches; but, due to subsequent erosion, the true eastern extent is unknown (Mossop and Shetsen, 1994). In northern Alberta, the Prairie Evaporite is correlated with the Muskeg and Presqu’ile formations (Rogers and Pratt, 2017).

Hydrographic isolation of the intracratonic basin from its marine connection resulted in the deposition of a drawndown sequence of basinwide (platform-dominant) evaporites with what is a uniquely high volume of preserved potash salts deposited within a clayey halite host. The potash resource in this basin far exceeds that of any other known potash basin in the world.


Potash geology

Potash deposits mined in Saskatchewan are all found within the upper 60-70 m of the Prairie Evaporite Formation, at depths of more than 400 to 2750 metres beneath the surface of the Saskatchewan Plains. Within the Prairie Evaporite, there are four main potash-bearing members, in ascending stratigraphic order they are: Esterhazy, White Bear, Belle Plaine and Patience Lake members (Figure 11b). Each member is composed of various combinations of halite, sylvite, sylvinite, and carnallitite, with occurrences of sylvite versus carnallite reliably definable using wireline signatures (once the wireline is calibrated to core or mine control - Figure 12; Fuzesy, 1982).

The Patience Lake Member is the uppermost Prairie Evaporite member and is separated from the Belle Plaine by 3-12 m of barren halite (Holter, 1972). Its thickness ranges from 0-21 m and averages 12 m, its top 7-14 m is made up halite with clay bands and stratiform sylvite. This is the targeted ore unit in conventional mines in the Saskatoon and Lanigan areas and is the solution-mined target, along with the underlying Belle Plaine Member, at the Mosaic Belle Plaine potash facility. The Belle Plaine member is separated from the Esterhazy by the White Bear Marker beds made up of some 15 m of low-grade halite, clay seams and sylvinite. The Belle Plaine Member is more carnallite-prone than the Patience Lake member (Figure 12). It is the ore unit in the conventional mines at Rocanville and Esterhazy (Figure 11b) where its thickness ranges from 0-18 m and averages around 9 m. In total, the Prairie Evaporite Formation does not contain any significant MgSO4 minerals (kieserite, polyhalite etc.) although some members do contain abundant carnallite. This mineralogy indicates precipitation from a Devonian seawater/brine chemistry somewhat different from today’s, with inherently lower relative proportions of sulphate and lower Mg/Ca ratios (Figure 4).

The Prairie Evaporite Fm. is nonhalokinetic throughout the basin, it is more than 200 m thick in the potash mining district in Saskatoon and 140 m thick in the Rocanville area to the southeast (Figure 11a; Yang et al., 2009). The Patience Lake member is the main target for conventional mining near Saskatoon. The Esterhazy potash member rises close to the surface in the southeastern part of Saskatchewan near Rocanville and on into Manitoba. This is a region where the Patience Lake Member is thinner or completely dissolved (Figure 11b). Over the area of mineable interest in the Patience Lake Member, centred on Saskatoon, the ore bed currently slopes downward only slightly in a westerly direction, but deepens more strongly to the south at a rate of 3-9 m/km. Mines near Saskatoon are at depths approaching a kilometre and so are nearing the limits of currently economic shaft mining.

The main shaft for the Colonsay Mine, which took IMC Global Inc. more than five years to complete through a water-saturated sediment column, finally reached the target ore body at a depth of 960 metres. Such depths and a southerly dip to the ore means that the conventional shaft mines near Saskatoon define a narrow WNW-ESE band of conventional mining activity (Figure 11c). To the south potash is recovered from greater depths by solution mining; for example, the Belle Plaine operation leaches potash from the Belle Plaine member at a depth of 1800m.

The Prairie Evaporite typically thins southwards in the basin; although local thickening occurs where carnallite, not sylvite, is the dominant potash mineral (Worsley and Fuzesy, 1979). The Patience Lake member is mined at the Cory, Allan and Lanigan mines, and the Esterhazy Member is mined in the Rocanville area (Figure 11c). Ore mined from the 2.4 m thick Esterhazy Member in eastern Saskatchewan contain minimal amounts of insolubles (≈1%), but considerable quantities of carnallite (typically 1%, but up to 10%) and this reduces the average KCl grade value to an average of 25% K2O. The converse is true for ore mined from the Patience Lake potash member in western Saskatchewan near Saskatoon, where carnallite is uncommon in the Cory and Allan mines. The mined ore thickness is a 2.74-3.35 metre cut off near the top of the 3.66-4.57metre Prairie Lake potash member. Ore grade is 20-26% K2O and inversely related to thickness (Figure 12). The insoluble content is 4-7%, mostly clay and markedly higher than in the Rocanville mines.


A typical sylvinite ore zone in the Patience Lake member can be divided into four to six units, based on potash rock-types and clay seams (Figures 12, 13a; M1-M6 of Boys, 1990). Units are mappable and have been correlated throughout the PCS Cory Mine with varying degrees of success, dependent on partial or complete loss of section from dissolution. Potash deposition appears to have been early and related to short-term brine seaway cooling and syndepositional brine reflux. So the potash layering (M1-M6) is cyclic, expressed in the repetitive distribution of hematite and other insoluble minerals (Figure 13). Desiccation polygons, desiccation cracks, subvertical microkarst pits and chevron halite crystals indicate that the Patience Lake member that encompasses the potash ore was deposited in and just beneath a shallow-brine, salt-pan environment (Figure 13b; Boys, 1990; Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990; Brodlyo and Spencer, 1987; pers. obs).

Clay seams form characteristic thin stratigraphic segregations throughout the potash ore zone(s) of the Prairie Evaporite, as well as disseminated intervals, and constitute about 6% of the ore as mined. For example, the insoluble minerals found in the PCS Cory samples are, in approximate order of decreasing abundance: dolomite, clay [illite, chlorite (including swelling-chlorite/chlorite), and septechlorite, quartz, anhydrite, hematite, and goethite. Clay minerals make up about one-third of the total insolubles: other minor components include: potassium feldspar, hydrocarbons, and sporadic non-diagnostic palynomorphs (Figure 13; Boys, 1990).

In all mines, the clays tend to occur as long continuous seams or marker layers between the potash zones and are mainly composed of detrital chlorite and illite, along withauthigenic septechlorite, montmorillonite and sepiolite (Mossman et al., 1982; Boys, 1990). Of the two chlorite minerals, septechlorite is the more thermally stable. The septechlorite, sepiolite and vermiculite very likely originated as direct products of settle-out, syndepositional dissolution or early diagenesis under hypersaline conditions from a precursor that was initially eolian dust settling to the bottom of a vast brine seaway. The absence of the otherwise ubiquitous septechlorite from Second Red Beds west of the zero-edge of the evaporite basin supports this concept (Figure 9, 10).


Potash Textures

Texturally, at the cm-scale, potash salt beds in the Prairie Evaporite (both carnallitite and sylvinite) lack the lateral continuity seen in primary potash textures in the Oligocene of the Mulhouse Basin (Figure 14). Prairie potash probably first formed as syndepositional secondary precipitates and alteration products at very shallow depths just beneath the sediment surface. These early prograde precipitates were then modified to varying degrees by ongoing fluid flushing in the shallow burial environment. The cyclic depositional distribution of disseminated insolubles as the clay marker beds was possibly due to a combination of source proximity, periodic enrichment during times of brine freshening and the strengthening of the winds blowing detritals out over the brine seaway. Possible intra-potash disconformities, created by dissolution of overlying potash-bearing salt beds, are indicated by an abundance of residual hematite in clay seams with some cutting subvertically into the potash bed. Except in, and near, dissolution levels and collapse features, the subsequent redistribution of insolubles, other than iron oxides, is not significant.

In general, halite-sylvite (sylvinite) rocks in the Prairie Evaporite ore zones generally show two end member textures; 1) the most common is a recrystallised polygonal mosaic texture with individual crystals ranging from millimetres to centimetres and sylvite grain boundaries outlined by concentrations of blood-red halite (Figure 14a). 2) The other end member texture is a framework of euhedral and subhedral halite cubes enclosed by anhedral crystals of sylvite (Figure 14b). This is very similar to ore textures in the Salado Formation of New Mexico interpreted as early passive precipitates in karstic voids.

Petrographically, the halite-carnallite (carnallitite) rocks display three distinct textures. Most halite-carnallite rocks contain isolated centimetre-sized cube mosaics of halite enclosed by poikilitic carnallite crystals (Figure 14c); 1) Individual halite cubes are typically clear, with occasional cloudy crystal cores that retain patches of syndepositional growth textures (Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990). 2) The second texture is coarsely crystalline halite-carnallite with equigranular, polygonal mosaic textures. In zones where halite overlies bedded anhydrite, most of the halite is clear with only the occasional crystal showing fluid inclusion banding.

Bedded halite away from the ore zones generally retains a higher proportion of primary depositional textures typical of halite precipitation in shallow ephemeral saline pans (Figure 14d; Brodylo and Spencer, 1987). Crystalline growth fabrics, mainly remnants of vertically-elongate halite chevrons, are found in 50-90% of the halite from many intervals in the Prairie Evaporite. Many of the chevrons are truncated by irregular patches of clear halite that formed as early diagenetic cements in syndepositional karst.

In contrast, the halite hosting the potash ore layers lacks well-defined primary textures but is dominated by intergrown mosaics. From the regional petrology and the lower than expected Br levels in halite in the Prairie Evaporite Formation, Schwerdtner (1964), Wardlaw and Watson (1966) and Wardlaw (1968) postulated a series of recrystallisation events forming sylvite after carnallite as a result of periodic flushing by hypersaline solutions. This origin as a secondary precipitate (via incongruent dissolution) is supported by observations of intergrowth and overgrowth textures (McIntosh and Wardlaw, 1968), collapse and dissolution features at various scales and timings (Gendzwill, 1978; Warren 2017), radiometric ages (Baadsgaard, 1987) and palaeomagnetic orientations of the diagenetic hematite linings associated with the emplacement of the potash (Koehler, 1997; Koehler et al., 1997).

Dating of clear halite crystals in void fills within the ore levels shows that some of the exceptionally coarse and pure secondary halites forming pods in the mined potash horizons likely precipitated during early burial, while other sparry halite void fills formed as late as Pliocene-Pleistocene (Baadsgard, 1987). Even today, alteration and remobilisation of the sylvite and carnallite and the local precipitation of bischofite are ongoing processes, related to the encroachment of the contemporary dissolution edge or the ongoing stoping of chimneys fed by deep artesian circulation (pers obs.).


Fluid inclusion studies support the notion of primary textures (low formation temperatures in chevron halite in the Prairie evaporite and an associated thermal separation of non-sylvite and sylvite associated halite (Figure 15; Chipley et al., 1990). Most fluid inclusions found in primary, fluid inclusion-banded halite associated with the Prairie potash salts contain sylvite daughter crystals at room temperature or nucleate them on cooling (e.g. halite at 915 and 945 m depth in the Winsal Osler well; Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990). In contrast, no sylvite daughter crystals have been observed in fluid inclusions outlining primary growth textures from chevron halites away from the potash deposits.

The data illustrated as Figure 15 clearly show that inclusion temperatures in primary halite chevrons are cooler than those in halites collected in intervals nearer the potash levels. Sylvite daughter crystal dissolution temperatures from fluid inclusions in the cloudy centres of halite crystals associated with potash salts are generally warmer (Brodlyo and Spencer, 1987; Lowenstein and Spencer, 1990). Sylvite and carnallite daughter crystal dissolution temperatures from fluid inclusions in fluid inclusion banded halite from bedded halite-carnallite are the hottest. This mineralogically-related temperature schism establishes that potash salts occur in stratigraphic intervals in the halite where syndepositional surface brines were warmer. In the 50° - 70°C temperature range there could be overlap with heliothermal brine lake waters. Even so, these warmer potash temperatures imply parent brines would likely be moving via a shallow reflux drive and are not the result of primary bottom nucleation (in contrast to primary sylvite in the Mulhouse Basin). Whether the initial Prairie reflux potash precipitate was sylvite or carnallite is open to interpretation (Lowenstein and Hardie, 1990).


Fluid evolution from mineral and isotope chemistry

Analysis of subsurface waters from various Canadian potash mines and collapse anomalies in the Prairie Evaporite suggest that, after initial potash precipitation, a series of recrystallising fluids accessed the evaporite levels at multiple times throughout the burial history of the Prairie Formation (Chipley, 1995; Koehler, 1997; Koehler et al., 1997). Likewise, the isotope systematics and K-Ar ages of sylvite in both halite and sylvite layers indicate that the Prairie Evaporite was variably recrystallised during fluid overprint events (Table 2; Figure 16). These event ages are all younger than original deposition (≈390Ma) and likely correspond to ages of various tectonic events that influenced subsurface hydrology along the western margin of North America.


Chemical compositions of inclusion fluids in the Prairie Evaporite, as determined by their thermometric properties, reveal at least two distinct waters played a role in potash formation: a Na-K-Mg-Ca-Cl brine, variably saturated with respect to sylvite and carnallite; and a Na-K-Cl brine (Horita et al., 1996). That is, contemporary inclusion water chemistry is a result in part of ongoing fluid-rock interaction. The ionic proportions in some halite samples are not the result of simple evaporation of seawater to the sylvite bittern stage (Figure 17a; Horita et al., 1996). There is a clear separation of values from chevron halites in samples from the Lanigan and Bredenbury (K-2 area) mines, which plot closer to the concentration trend seen in halite from modern seawater and values from clear or sparry halite. The latter encompass much lower K and higher Br related to fractionation tied to recrystallisation. Likewise, the influence of ongoing halite and potash salt dissolution is evident in the chemistry of shaft and mine waters with mine level waters showing elevated Mg and K values, (Figure 17b; Wittrup and Kyser, 1990; Chipley, 1995). What is more the mine waters of today show  substantial overlap with waters collected more than thirty years ago (Jensen et al., 2006)


This notion of ongoing fluid-rock interaction controlling the chemistry of mine waters is supported by dD and d18O values of inclusion fluids in both halite and sylvite, which range from -146 to 0‰ and from -17.6 to -3.0‰, respectively (Figure 18). Most of the various preserved isotope values are different from those of evaporated seawater, which should have dD and d18O values near 0‰.

Furthermore, the dD and d18O values of inclusion fluids are probably not the result of precipitation of the evaporite minerals from a brine that was a mixture of seawater and meteoric water. The low latitude position of the basin during the Middle Devonian (10-15° from the equator), the required lack of meteoric water to precipitate basinwide evaporites, and the expected dD and d18O values of any meteoric water in such a setting, make this an unlikely explanation. Rather, the dD and d18O values of inclusion fluids in the halites reflect ambient and evolving brine chemistries as the fluids in inclusions in the various growth layers were intermittently trapped during the subsurface evolution of the Prairie Formation in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. They also suggest that periodic migration of nonmarine subsurface water was a significant component of the crossflowing basinal brines throughout much of the recrystallisation history (Chipley, 1995).

Prairie carnallite-sylvite alteration over time

Ongoing alteration of carnallite to sylvite and the reverse reaction means a sylvite-carnallite bed must be capable of gaining or losing fluid at the time of alteration. That is, any reacting potash beds must be permeable at the time of the alteration. By definition, there must be fluid egress to drive incongruent alteration of carnallite to sylvite or fluid ingress to drive the alteration of sylvite to carnallite. There can also be situations in the subsurface where the volume of undersaturated fluid crossflow was sufficient to remove (dissolve) significant quantities of the more soluble evaporite salts. Many authors looking at the Prairie evaporite argue that the fluid access events during the alteration of carnallite to sylvite or the reverse, or the complete leaching of the soluble potash salts was driven by various tectonic events (Figure 16). In the early stages of burial alteration (few tens of metres from the landsurface) the same alteration processes can be driven by varying combinations of brine reflux, prograde precipitation and syndepositional karstification, all driven by changes in brine level and climate, which in turn may not be related to tectonism (Warren, 2016; Chapters 2 and 8 for details).

In the potash areas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, the notion of 10-100 km lateral continuity is a commonly stated precept for both sylvinite and carnallitite units across the extent of the Prairie Evaporite. But when the actual distribution and scale of units are mapped based on mined intercepts, there are numerous 10-100 metre-scale discontinuities (anomalies) present indicating fluid ingress or egress (Warren, 2017).


Sometimes ore beds thin and alteration degrades the ore level (Section A-A1-A2), other times these discontinuities can locally enrich sylvite ore grade (B-B1; Figure 19). Discontinuities or salt anomalies are much more widespread in the Prairie evaporite than mentioned in much of the potash literature (Figure 19). Mining for maintenance of ore grade shows that unexpectedly intersecting an anomaly in a sylvite ore zone can have a range of outcomes ranging from the inconsequential to the catastrophic, in part because there is more than one type of salt anomaly or “salt horse" (Warren, 2017).


Figure 20 summarises what are considered the three most common styles of salt anomaly in the sylvite ore beds of the Prairie Evaporite, namely 1) Washouts, 2) Leach anomalies, 3) Collapse anomalies. These ore bed disturbances and their occurrence styles are in part time-related. Washouts are typically early (eogenetic) and defined as... “salt-filled V- or U-shaped structures, which transect the normal bedded sequence and obliterate the stratigraphy” (Figure 20a; Mackintosh and McVittie, 1983, p. 60). They are typically enriched in, or filled by, insoluble materials in their lower one-third and medium-coarse-grained sparry halite in the upper two thirds. Up to several metres across, when traced laterally they typically pass into halite-cemented paleo-sinks and cavern networks (e.g. Figure 20b). Most washouts likely formed penecontemporaneous to the potash beds they transect, that is, they are preserved examples of synkarst, with infilling of the karst void by a slightly later halite cement. They indicate watertable lowering in a potash-rich saline sump. This leaching was followed soon after by a period of higher watertables and brine saturations, when halite cements occluded the washouts and palaeocaverns. Modern examples of this process typify the edges of subcropping and contemporary evaporite beds, as about the recently exposed edges of the modern Dead Sea. As such, “washouts” tend to indicate relatively early interactions of the potash interval with undersaturated waters, they may even be a part of the syndepositional remobilisation hydrology that focused, and locally enriched, potash ore levels.

In a leach anomaly zone, the stratabound sylvinite ore zone has been wholly or partially replaced by barren halite, without significantly disturbing the normal stratigraphic sequence (clay marker beds) which tend to continue across the anomaly (Figure 20b). Some loss of volume or local thinning of the stratigraphy is typical in this type of salt anomaly. Typically saucer-shaped, they have diameters ranging from a few metres up to 400m. Less often, they can be linear features that are up to 20 m wide and 1600m long. Leach zones can form penecontemporaneously due to depressions and back-reactions in the ore beds, or by later low-energy infiltration of Na-saturated, K-undersaturated brines. The latter method of formation is also likely on the margins of collapse zones, creating a hybrid situation typically classified as a leach-collapse anomaly (Mackintosh and McVittie, 1983; McIntosh and Wardlaw, 1968).

Of the three types of salt anomaly illustrated, leach zone processes are the least understood. Historically, when incongruent dissolution was the widely accepted interpretation for loss of unit thickness in the Prairie Evaporite, many leach anomalies were considered metasomatic. Much of the original metasomatic interpretation was based on decades of detailed work in the various salt mines of the German Zechstein Basin. There, in an endemic halokinetic terrane, evaporite textures were considered more akin to metamorphic rocks, and the term metasomatic alteration was commonly used when explaining leach anomalies (Bochert and Muir, 1964, Braitsch, 1971). In the past two decades, general observations of the preservation of primary chevron halite in most bedded evaporites away from the potash layers in the Prairie Evaporite have led to reduced use of notions of widespread metamorphic-like metasomatic or solid-state alteration processes in bedded evaporites. There is just too much preserved primary texture in the bedded salt units adjacent to potash beds to invoke pervasive burial metasomatism of the Prairie Evaporite.


So how do leach anomalies, as illustrated in Figure 20b, occur in nonhalokinetic settings? One possible explanation is given by the depositional textures documented in anomalies in the Navarra Potash Province (Figure 21). There, the underlying and overlying salt stratigraphy is contiguous, while the intervening sylvite passed laterally into a syndepositional anomaly or “salt horse” created by an irregular topography on the salt pan floor prior to the deposition of onlapping primary sylvinite layers (see Warren 2016, 2017 for detailed discussion)

On the other hand, in halokinetic situations (which characterises much Zechstein salt) solid-state alteration via inclusion related migration in flowing salt beds is a well-documented set of texture-altering processes (diffusion metasomatism). Most workers in such halokinetic systems would agree that there must have been an original stratiform potassium segregation present during or soon after deposition related to initial precipitation, fractional dissolution and karst-cooling precipitation. But what is controlling potassium distribution now in the Zechstein salts is a recrystallised and remobilised set of textures, which preserve little or no crystal-scale evidence of primary conditions (Warren, 2016; Chapter 6). The complex layering in such deposits may preserve a broad depositional stratigraphy, but the decimetre to metre scale mineral distributions are indications of complex interactions of folds, overfolds, and disaggregation with local flow thickening. We shall return to this discussion of Zechstein potash textures in the next section dealing with devolatisation of hydrated salts such as carnallite. in zones of local heating

Collapse zones in the Prairie Evaporite are characterized by a loss of recognizable sylvinite ore strata, which is replaced by less saline brecciated, recemented and recrystallized material, with the breccia blocks typically made of the intrasalt or roof lithologies (Figure 20c), so angular fragments of the Second Red beds and dolostones of the Dawson Bay Formation are the most conspicuous components of the collapse features in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. When ore dissolution is well developed, all the halite can dissolve, along with the potash salts, and the overlying strata collapse into the cavity (these are classic solution collapse features). Transitional leached zones typically separate the collapsed core from normal bedded potash. Such collapse structures indicate a breach of the ore layers by unsaturated waters, fed either from below or above. For example, in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin, well-developed collapse structures tend to occur over the edges and top Devonian mud mounds, while in the New Mexico potash zone the collapse zones are related to highs in the underlying Capitan reef trend (Warren, 2017). Leaching fluids may have come from below or above to form collapse structures at any time after initial deposition. When connected to a water source, these are the subsurface features that when intersected can quickly move the mining operation out of the salt into an adjacent aquifer system, a transition that led to flooding in most of the mine-lost operations listed earlier.

Identifying at the mine scale the set of processes that created a salt anomaly in a sylvite bed also has implications in terms of its likely influence on mine stability whatever decision is made on how to deal with it as part of the ongoing mine operation (Warren, 2016, 2017). Syndepositional karst fills and leach anomalies are least likely to be problematic if penetrated during mining, as the aquifer system that formed them is likely no longer active. In contrast, penetration or removal of the region around a salt-depleted collapse breccia may lead to uncontrollable water inflows and ultimately to the loss of the mine.

Unfortunately, in terms of production planning, the features of the periphery of a leach anomaly can be similar if not identical to those in the alteration halo that typically forms about the leached edge a collapse zone. The processes of sylvite recrystallisation that define the edge of collapse anomaly can lead to local enrichment in sylvite levels, making these zones surrounding the collapse core attractive extraction targets (Boys 1990, 1993). Boundaries of any alteration halo about a collapse centre are not concentric, but irregular, making the prediction of a feature’s geometry challenging, if not impossible. The safest course of action is to avoid mining salt anomalies, but longwall techniques make this difficult and so they must be identified and dealt with (see Warren 2017).


Cooking sylvite: Dykes & sills in potash salts

 

In addition to; 1) primary sylvite and 2) sylvite/carnallite alteration via incongruent transformation in burial, there is a third mode of sylvite formation related to 3) igneous heating driving devolatisation of carnallitite, which can perhaps be considered a form of incongruent melting (Warren, 2016). And so, at a local scale (measured in metres to tens of metres) in potash beds cut by igneous intrusions, there are a number of documented thermally-driven alteration styles and thermal haloes. Most are created by the intrusion of hot doleritic or basaltic dykes and sills into cooler salt masses, or the outflow of extrusive igneous flows over cooler salt beds (Knipping, 1989; Grishina et al, 1992, 1998; Gutsche, 1988; Steinmann et al., 1999; Wall et al., 2010). Hot igneous material interacts with somewhat cooler anhydrous salt masses to create narrow, but distinct, heat and mobile fluid-release envelopes, also reflected in the resulting salt textures. At times, relatively rapid magma emplacement can lead to linear breakout trends outlined by phreatomagmatic explosion craters, as imaged in portions of the North Sea (Wall et al., 2010) and the Danakhil/Dallol potash beds in Ethiopia (Salty Matters, May 1, 2015).

Based on studies of inclusion chemistry and homogenization temperatures in fluid inclusions in bedded halite near intrusives, it seems that the extent of the influence of a dolerite sill or dyke in bedded salt is marked by fluid-inclusion migration, evidenced by the disappearance of chevron structures and consequent formation of clear halite with a different set of higher-temperature inclusions. Such a migration envelope is well documented in bedded Cambrian halites intruded by end-Permian dolerite dykes in the Tunguska region of Siberia (Grishina et al., 1992).

Defining h as the thickness of the dolerite intrusion in these salt beds, and d as the distance of the halite from the edge of the intrusion, then the disappearance of chevrons occurs at greater distances above than below the intrusive sill. For d/h < 0.9 below the intrusion, CaCl2, CaCl2, KCl and nCaCl2, mMgCl2 solids occur in association with water-free and liquid-CO2 inclusions, with H2S, SCO and orthorhombic or glassy S8. For a d/h of 0.2-2 above the intrusion, H2S-bearing liquid-CO2 inclusions are typical, with various amounts of water. Thus, as a rule of thumb, an alteration halo extends up to twice the thickness of the dolerite sill above the sill and almost the thickness of the sill below (Figure 22).

In a series of autoclavation laboratory experiments, Fabricius and Rose-Hampton (1988) found that; 1) at atmospheiric pressure carnallite melts incongruently to sylvite and hydrated MgCl2 at a temperature of 167.5°C. 2) the melting/transformation temperature increase to values in excess of 180°C as the pressure increases (Figure 23).


A similar situation occurs in the dyke-intruded halite levels exposed in the mines of the Werra-Fulda district of Germany (Steinmann et al., 1999; Schofield, et al., 2014). There the Herfa-Neurode potash mine is located in the Werra-Fulda Basin in the Hessian district of central Germany (Figure 24a). The targeted ore levels consist of the carnallite-rich Kaliflöz Hessen (K1H) and Kaliflöz Thüringen (K1Th) intervals, which form part of the Zechstein 1 (Z1) bedded Werra salt succession (Warren, 2016). In the mine the K1H and K1Th units range in thickness from 2 m to 10 m, are generally subhorizontal and occur at a depth of 650–710 m below the present-day surface.


In the later Tertiary, basaltic melts intruded these Zechstein evaporites as numerous sub-vertical dykes, but only a few dykes attained the Miocene landsurface. Basaltic melt production was related to regional volcanic activity some 10 to 25 Ma. Basalts exposed in the mine walls, where it cuts non-hydrous units of halite or anhydrite, are typically subvertical dykes, rather than subhorizontal sills. The basalts are phonolitic tephrites, limburgites, basanites and olivine nephelinites. Dyke margins are usually vitrified, forming a microlitic limburgite glass along dyke edges in contact with halite (Figure 24b; Knipping, 1989). At the contact on the evaporite side of the glassy rim, there is a cm-wide carapace of high-temperature salts (mostly anhydrite and ferroan carbonates). Further out, the effect of the high-temperature envelope is denoted by transitions to clear halite, with higher temperature fluid inclusions (Knipping 1989). All of this metre-scale alteration is an anhydrous alteration halo, the halite did not melt (melting temperature of 804°C), rather than migrating, the fluid driving recrystallisation was mostly from entrained brine/gas inclusions. The dolerite/basalt interior of the basaltic dyke is likewise altered and salt soaked, with clear, largely inclusion-free halite typically filling vesicles in the basalt.

Heating of hydrated (carnallitic) salt layers, adjacent to a dyke or sill, tends to drive off the water of crystallisation (chemical or hydration thixotropy) at much lower temperatures than that at which anhydrous salts, such as halite or anhydrite, thermally melt (Figure 24c; Table 3). For example, in the Fulda region, the thermally-driven release of water of crystallisation within carnallitic beds creates thixotropic or subsurface “peperite” textures as carnallitite alters to sylvinite layers. These are layers where heated water of crystallisation escaped from the hydrated-salt lattice. Dehydration-driven loss of mechanical strength focuses zones of magma entry into particular subhorizontal horizons in the salt mass, wherever hydrated salt layers were present. In contrast, dyke and sill margins are much sharper and narrower in zones of contact with anhydrous salt intervals and the intrusive is sub-vertical to steeply dipping (Figure 24b versus 24c).

Accordingly, away from the immediate vicinity of the direct thermal aureole, heated and overpressured dehydration waters can enter carnallite halite bed, and drive the creation of extensive soft sediment deformation and peperite textures in hydrated layer (Figure 24c). Mineralogically, sylvite and coarse recrystallised halite dominate the salt fraction in the peperite intervals of the Herfa-Neurode mine. Sylvite in the altered zone is a form of dehydrated carnallite, not a primary-textured salt. Across the Fulda region, such altered zones and deformed units can extend along former carnallite layer to tens or even a hundred or more metres from the dyke feeder. Ultimately, the deformed potash bed passes back out into the unaltered bed, which retains abundant inclusion-rich halite and carnallite (Schofield et al., 2014).

That is, nearer the basalt dyke, the carnallite is largely transformed into inclusion-poor halite and sylvite, the result of incongruent flushing of warm saline fluids mobilised from the hydrated carnallite crystal lattice as it was heated by dyke emplacement. During Miocene salt alteration/thermal metamorphism in the Fulda region, NaCl-fluids were mixed with fluids and gases originating from thermally-mobilised crystallisation water in the carnallite, as it converted to sylvite. This brine/gas mixture altered the basalts during post-intrusive cooling, an event which numerical models suggest was quite rapid (Knipping, 1989): a dyke of less than 0.5 m thickness probably cooled to temperatures less than 200°C within 14 days of dyke emplacement.

The contrast in alteration extent between anhydrous and hydrous salt layers shows alteration effects are minimal wherever the emplacement temperature of the magma is below that of the anhydrous salt body as it is next to a basalt dyke. If this is the mechanism driving entry of igneous-related volatiles (gases and liquids) into a salt body, then the distribution of products (including CO2) will be highly inhomogeneous and related to the minerally of the salt unit adjacent to the intrusive. Worldwide, dykes intersecting salt beds tend to widen to become sills in two zones: 1) along evaporite units within the halite mass that contain hydrated salts, such as carnallite or gypsum (Figure 24c) and, 2) where rising magma has ponded and so created laccoliths at the upper or lower halite contact with the adjacent nonsalt strata or against a salt wall (Figure 22 vs 24). The first is a response to a pulse of released water as dyke-driven heating forces the dehydration of hydrated salt layers. The second is a response to the mechanical strength contrast at the salt-nonsalt contact.

In summary, sylvite formed from a carnallite precursor during Miocene salt alteration/thermal metamorphism in the Fulda region, NaCl-fluids were mixed with fluids originating from thermally-mobilised crystallisation water in the carnallite, as it converted to sylvite. This brine mixture altered the basalts during post-intrusive cooling, an event which numerical models suggest was quite rapid (Knipping, 1989): a dyke of less than 0.5 m thickness probably cooled to temperatures less than 200°C within 14 days of dyke emplacement.

How do we produce potash salts?

 

Over this series of three articles focused on current examples of potash production, we have seen there are two main groups of potash minerals currently utilised to make fertiliser, namely, muriate of potash (MOP) and sulphate of potash (SOP). MOP is both mined (generally from a Pre-Neogene sylvinite ore) or produced from brine pans (usually via processing of a carnallitite slurry). In contrast, large volumes of SOP are today produced from brine pans in China and the USA but with only minor production for solid-state ore targets. Historically, SOP was produced from solid-state ores in Sicily, the Ukraine, and Germany but today there are no conventional mines with SOP as the prime output in commercial operation (See Salty Matters, May 12, 2015).

The MgSO4-enriched chemistry of modern seawater makes the economic production of potash bitterns from a seawater-feed highly challenging. Today, there is no marine-fed plant anywhere in the world producing primary sylvite precipitates. However, sylvite is precipitating from a continental brine feed in salt pans on the Bonneville salt flat, Utah. There, a brine field, drawing shallow pore waters from saltflat sediments, supplies suitably low-MgSO4 inflow chemistry to the concentrator pans. Sylvite also precipitates in solar evaporator pans in Utah that are fed brine circulated through the abandoned workings of the Cane Creek potash mine (Table 1).

Large-scale production of MOP fertiliser from potash precipitates created in solar evaporation pans is taking place in perennially subaqueous saline pans of the southern Dead Sea and the Qaidam Basin. In the Dead Sea, the feed brine is pumped from the waters of the northern Dead Sea basin, while in the Qaidam sump the feed is from a brine field drawing pore brines with an appropriate mix of river and basinal brine inputs. In both cases, the resulting feed brine to the final concentrators is relatively depleted in magnesium and sulphate. These source bitterns have ionic proportions not unlike seawater in times of ancient MgSO4-depleted oceans. Carnallitite slurries, not sylvinite, are the MOP precipitates in pans in both regions. When feed chemistry of the slurry is low in halite, then the process to recover sylvite is a cold crystallisation technique. When halite impurity levels in the slurry are higher, sylvite is manufactures using a more energy intensive, and hence more expensive, hot crystallisation technique. Similar sulphate-depleted brine chemistry is used in Salar Atacama, where MOP and SOP are recovered as byproducts of the production of lithium carbonate brines.

Significant volumes of SOP are recovered from a combination of evaporation and cryogenic modification of sulfate-enriched continental brines in pans on the edge of the Great Salt Lake, Utah, and Lop Nur, China. When concentrated and processed, SOP is recovered from the processing of a complex series of Mg-K-SO4 double salts (schoenitic) in the Odgden pans fed brines from the Great Salt Lake. The Lop Nur plant draws and concentrates pore waters from a brine field drawing waters from glauberite-polyhalite-entraining saline lake sediments.

All the Quaternary saline lake factories supply less than 20% of the world's potash; the majority comes from the conventional mining of sylvinite ores. The world's largest reserves are held in Devonian evaporites of the Prairie Evaporite in the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin. Textures and mineral chemistry show that the greater volume of bedded potash salts in this region is not a primary sylvite precipitate. Rather the ore distribution, although stratiform and defined by a series of clay marker beds, actually preserves the effects of multiple modifications and alterations tied to periodic egress and ingress of basinal waters. Driving mechanisms for episodes of fluid crossflow range from syndepositional leaching and reflux through to tectonic pumping and uplift (telogenesis). Ore distribution and texturing reflect local-scale (10-100 metres) discontinuities and anomalies created by this evolving fluid chemistry. Some alteration episodes are relatively benign in terms of mineralogical modification and bed continuity. Others, generally tied to younger incidents (post early Cretaceous) of undersaturated crossflow and karstification, can have substantial effects on ore continuity and susceptibility to unwanted fluid entry. In contrast, ore textures and bed continuity in the smaller-scale sylvinite ores in the Oligocene Mulhouse Basin, France, indicate a primary ore genesis.

What makes it economic?

Across the Quaternary, we need a saline lake brine systems with the appropriate brine proportions, volumes and climate to precipitate the right association of processable potash salts. So far, the price of potash, either MOP or SOP, and the co-associated MgSO4 bitterns, precludes industrial marine-fed brine factories.

In contrast, to the markedly nonmarine locations of potash recovery from the Quaternary sources, almost all pre-Quaternary potash operations extract product from marine-fed basinwide ore hosts during times of MgSO4-depleted and MgSO4-enriched oceans (Warren, 2016; Chapter 11). This time-based dichotomy in potash ore sources with nonmarine hosts in the Quaternary deposits and marine evaporite hosted ore zones in Miocene deposits and older, reflects a simple lack of basinwide marine deposits and appropriate marine chemistry across the Neogene (Warren, 2010). As for all ancient marine evaporites, the depositional system that deposited ancient marine-fed potash deposits was one to two orders of magnitude larger and the resultant deposits were typically thicker stacks than any Quaternary potash settings. The last such “saline giant” potash system was the Solfifera series in the Sicilian basin, deposited as part of the Mediterranean “salinity crisis,” but these potential ore beds are of the less economically attractive MgSO4- enriched marine potash series.

So, what are the factors that favour the formation of, and hence exploration for, additional deposits of exploitable ancient potash? First, large MOP solid-state ore sources are all basinwide, not lacustrine deposits. Within the basinwide association, it seems that intracratonic basins host significantly larger reserves of ore, compared to systems that formed in the more tectonically-active plate-edge rift and suture association. This is a reflection of: 1) accessibility – near the shallow current edge of a salt basin, 2) a lack of a halokinetic overprint and, 3) the setup of longterm, stable, edge-dissolution brine hydrologies that typify many intracratonic basins. Known reserves of potash in the Devonian Prairie evaporite in West Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) are of the order of 50 times that of next largest known deposit, the Permian of the Upper Kama basin, and more than two orders of magnitude larger than any other of the other known exploited deposits (Table 1).

Part of this difference in the volume of recoverable reserves lies in the fact that the various Canadian potash members in the WCSB are still bedded and flat-lying. Beds have not been broken up or steepened, by any subsequent halokinesis. The only set of processes overprinting and remobilising the various potash salts in the WCSB are related to multiple styles and timings of aquifer encroachment on the potash units, and this probably took place at various times since the potash was first deposited, driven mainly by a combination of hinterland uplift and subrosion. In contrast, most of the other significant potash basins listed in Table 10 have been subjected to ongoing combinations of halokinesis and groundwater encroachments, making these beds much less laterally predictable. In their formative stages, the WCSB potash beds were located a substantial distance from the orogenic belt that drove flexural downwarp and creation of the subsealevel sag depression. Like many other intracratonic basins, the WCSB did not experience significant syndepositional compression or rift-related loading.

References

Adamo, S., 1992, The Sicilian rock salt and potash mines: Mining Magazine, v. 166, p. 277-283.

Adams, S. S., 1970, Ore controls, Carlsbad potash district, southeast New Mexico, in J. L. Rau, and L. F. Dellwig, eds., Third Symposium on Salt, v. 1: Cleveland, Ohio, Northern Ohio Geological Society, p. 246-257.

Baadsgaard, H., 1987, Rb-Sr and K-Ca isotope systematics in minerals from potassium horizons in the Prairie Evaporite Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada: Chemical Geology, v. 66, p. 1-15.

Baar, C. A., 1974, Geological problems in Saskatchewan potash mining due to peculiar conditions during deposition of Potash Beds, in A. H. Coogan, ed., Fourth Symposium on Salt, v. 1: Cleveland, Ohio, North Ohio Geological Society, p. 101-118.

Bastow, I. D., A. D. Booth, G. Corti, D. Keir, C. Magee, C. A.-L. Jackson, J. Warren, J. Wilkinson, and M. Lascialfari, 2018, The development of late-stage continental breakup: Seismic reflection and borehole evidence from the Danakil Depression, Ethiopia: Tectonics, v. 37.

Bingham, C. P., 1980, Solar production of potash from brines of the Bonneville Salt Flats, in J. W. Gwynn, ed., Great Salt Lake; a scientific, history and economic overview. , v. 116, Bulletin Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, p. 229-242.

Blanc-Valleron, M.-M., and M. Schuler, 1997, The Salt Basins of Alsace (Southern Rhine Graben), in G. Busson, and B. C. Schreiber, eds., Sedimentary Deposition in Rift and Foreland Basins in France and Spain (Paleogene and Lower Neogene): New York, Columbia University Press, p. 95–135.

Blanc-Valleron, M. M., 1991, Les formations paléogènes évaporitiques du bassin potassique de Mulhouse et des bassins plus septentrion aux d'Alsace (Document BRGM, 204), Université Louis Pasteur, Paris, 350 p.

Borchert, H., and R. O. Muir, 1964, Salt deposits-The origin, metamorphism and deformation of evaporites: London, D. Van Nostrand Co., Ltd., 338 p.

Boys, C., 1990, The geology of potash deposits at PCS Cory Mine, Saskatchewan: Master's thesis, University of Saskatchewan; Saskatoon, SK; Canada, 225 p.

Boys, C., 1993, A geological approach to potash mining problems in Saskatchewan, Canada: Exploration & Mining Geology, v. 2, p. 129-138.

Braitsch, O., 1971, Salt Deposits: Their Origin and Compositions: New York, Springer-Verlag, 297 p.

Brodylo, L. A., and R. J. Spencer, 1987, Depositional environment of the Middle Devonian Telegraph Salts, Alberta, Canada: Bulletin Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 35, p. 186-196.

Cendon, D. I., C. Ayora, J. J. Pueyo, and C. Taberner, 2003, The geochemical evolution of the Catalan potash subbasin, South Pyrenean foreland basin (Spain): Chemical Geology, v. 200, p. 339-357.

Cendon, D. I., C. Ayora, J. J. Pueyo, C. Taberner, and M. M. Blanc-Valleron, 2008, The chemical and hydrological evolution of the Mulhouse potash basin (France): Are "marine" ancient evaporites always representative of synchronous seawater chemistry?: Chemical Geology, v. 252, p. 109-124.

Cendon, D. I., C. Ayora, and J. P. Pueyo, 1998, The origin of barren bodies in the Subiza potash deposit, Navarra, Spain - Implications for sylvite formation: Journal of Sedimentary Research Section A-Sedimentary Petrology & Processes, v. 68, p. 43-52.

Cheng, H. D., Q. Y. Hai, H. Z. Ma, X. Y. Zhang, Q. L. Tang, Q. S. Fan, Y. S. Li, and W. L. Miao, 2016, Implications for the origin of secondary sylvite from a simulation of carnallite dissolution: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 165, p. 189-198.

Cheng, H. D., H. Z. Ma, Q. Y. Hai, Z. H. Zhang, L. M. Xu, and G. F. Ran, 2015, Model for the decomposition of carnallite in aqueous solution: Int. J. Miner. Process., v. 139, p. 36-42.

Chipley, D., and T. K. Kyser, 1991, Large scale fluid movement in the Western Canadian sedimentary basin as recorded by fluid inclusions in evaporites, in J. E. Christopher, and F. M. Haidl, eds., Sixth international Williston Basin symposium, v. 6, Special Publication Saskatchewan Geological Society, p. 265-269.

Chipley, D., T. K. Kyser, and T. Danyluk, 1990, Fluid flow events in the Elk Point Baain of western Canada as recorded in evaporite minerals: Summary of Investigations 1990, Saskatchewan Geological Survey; Saskatchewan Energy and Mines, Miscellaneous Report, p. 211-217.

Chipley, D. B. L., 1995, Fluid history of the Saskatchewan sub-basin of the western Canada sedimentary basin: Evidence from the geochemistry of evaporites: Doctoral thesis, University of Saskatchewan.

Chipley, D. B. L., and T. K. Kyser, 1989, Fluid inclusion evidence for the deposition and diagenesis of the Patience Lake Member of the Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation, Saskatchewan, Canada: Sedimentary Geology, v. 64, p. 287-295.

de Ruiter, P. A. C., 1979, The Gabon and Congo basins salt deposits: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 419-431.

Dong, Z., P. Lv, G. Qian, X. Xia, Y. Zhao, and G. Mu, 2012, Research progress in China's Lop Nur: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 111, p. 142-153.

Duan, Z. H., and W. X. Hu, 2001, The accumulation of potash in a continental basin: the example of the Qarhan Saline Lake, Qaidam Basin, West China: European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 13, p. 1223-1233.

Eatock, W. H., 1987, The Big Quill Lake sulphate of potash project, in C. F. Gilboy, and L. W. Vigrass, eds., Economic Minerals of Saskatchewan, Proceedings of a Symposium Held in Regina, Saskatchewan 17 & 18 November 1986, : Saskatchewan Geological Society Special Publication Number 8, p. 206–210.

El Tabakh, M., C. Utha-Aroon, and B. C. Schreiber, 1999, Sedimentology of the Cretaceous Maha Sarakham evaporites in the Khorat Plateau of northeastern Thailand: Sedimentary Geology, v. 123, p. 31-62.

Emons, H., and H. Voigt, 1981, Untersvchungen zur kalten zersetzunung von Carnallit.: Freiberg Forschungsher, v. A628, p. 69-78.

Evans, R., 1970, Genesis of sylvite- and carnallite-bearing rocks from Wallace, Nova Scotia: Third Symposium on Salt, v. 1, p. 239-245.

 

Fabricius, J., and Rose-Hansen, J., 1988, Pressure-dependent melting curve of natural carnallite, KMgCl3.6H2O, in a closed system where evaporation is prevented. IX Symposium on Fluid Inclusions, 4-6 May, 1987, Oporto, Portugal.

 

Fuzesy, A., 1982, Potash in Saskatchewan: Report, Saskatchewan Department of Mineral Resources, v. 181, 45 p.

Garrett, D. E., 1995, Potash: Deposits, processing, properties and uses: Berlin, Springer, 752 p.

Garrett, D. E., 2004, Handbook of Lithium and natural Calcium Chloride; Their deposits, processing, uses and properties Amsterdam, Elsevier Academic Press, 476 p.

Gendzwill, D. J., 1978, Winnipegosis mounds and Prairie Evaporite Formation of Saskatchewan – seismic study: Bulletin American Association Petroleum Geologists, v. 62, p. 73-86.

Grishina, S., J. Dubessy, A. Kontorovich, and J. Pironon, 1992, Inclusions in salt beds resulting from thermal metamorphism by dolerite sills (eastern Siberia, Russia): European Journal of Mineralogy, v. 4, p. 1187-1202.

Grishina, S., J. Pironon, M. Mazurov, S. Goryainov, A. Pustilnikov, G. Fonderflaas, and A. Guerci, 1998, Organic inclusions in salt - Part 3 - Oil and gas inclusions in Cambrian evaporite deposits from east Siberia - A contribution to the understanding of nitrogen generation in evaporite: Organic Geochemistry, v. 28, p. 297-310.

Gutsche, A., 1988, Mineralreaktionen und Sto€transporte an einem Kontakt Basalt-Hartsalz in der Werra-Folge des Werkes Hattorf: Unpubl. diploma thesis, thesis, Georg-August-Universita, Gottingen.

Hardie, L. A., 1984, Evaporites: Marine or non-marine?: American Journal of Science, v. 284, p. 193-240.

Hardie, L. A., 1990, The roles of rifting and hydrothermal CaCl2 brines in the origin of potash evaporites: an hypothesis: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 43-106.

Hinsken, S., K. Ustaszewski, and A. Wetze, 2007, Graben width controlling syn-rift sedimentation: the Palaeogene southern Upper Rhine Graben as an example: International Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 96, p. 979-1002.

Hite, R. J., 1961, Potash-bearing evaporite cycles in the salt anticlines of the Paradox Basin, Colorado and Utah; Article 337: U. S. Geological Survey Professional Paper. p. D323-D327.

Hite, R. J., and T. Japakasetr, 1979, Potash deposits of the Khorat Plateau, Thailand and Laos: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 448-458.

Hofmann, P., A. Y. Huc, B. Carpentier, P. Schaeffer, P. Albrecht, B. Keely, J. R. Maxwell, D. J. S. Sinninghe, L. J. W. de, and D. Leythaeuser, 1993a, Organic matter of the Mulhouse Basin, France; a synthesis: Organic Geochemistry, v. 20, p. 1105-1123.

Hofmann, P., D. Leythaeuser, and B. Carpentier, 1993b, Palaeoclimate controlled accumulation of organic matter in Oligocene evaporite sediments of the Mulhouse Basin: Organic Geochemistry, v. 20, p. 1125-1138.

Holser, W. T., 1979, Trace elements and isotopes in evaporites in R. G. Burns, ed., Marine Minerals, v. 6, Reviews in Mineralogy, p. 295-346.

Holt, N. M., J. García-Veigas, T. K. Lowenstein, P. S. Giles, and S. Williams-Stroud, 2014, The major-ion composition of Carboniferous seawater: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 134, p. 317-334.

Holter, M., 1972, Geology of the Prairie Evaporite Formation of Saskatchewan, Canada, Geology of saline deposits (Geologie des depots salins), v. 7, UNESCO Earth Sci. Ser., p. 183-189.

Holwerda, J. G., and R. W. Hutchinson, 1968, Potash-bearing evaporites in the Danakil area, Ethiopia: Economic Geology, v. 63, p. 124-150.

Hong, X. L., S. P. Xia, and S. Y. Gao, 1994, Dissolution kinetics of carnallite (in Chinese with English abstract). Chin. J. Appl. Chem., v. 11, p. 26-31.

Horita, J., A. Weinberg, N. Das, and H. Holland, 1996, Brine inclusions in halite and the origin of the Middle Devonian Prairie evaporites of western Canada: Journal of Sedimentary Research Section A-Sedimentary Petrology & Processes, v. 66, p. 956-954.

Hryniv, S. P., B. V. Dolishniy, O. V. Khmelevska, A. V. Poberezhskyy, and S. V. Vovnyuk, 2007, Evaporites of Ukraine: a review: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 285, p. 309-334.

Jensen, G. K. S., B. J. Rostron, M. J. M. Duke, and C. Holmden, 2006, Bromine and stable isotopic profiles of formation waters from potash mine-shafts, Saskatchewan, Canada: Journal of Geochemical Exploration, v. 89, p. 170-173.

Knipping, B., 1989, Basalt intrusions in evaporites: Lecture Notes in Earth Sciences (Springer-Verlag), v. 24, p. 132 pp.

Koehler, G., T. K. Kyser, R. Enkin, and E. Irving, 1997, Paleomagnetic and isotopic evidence for the diagenesis and alteration of evaporites in the Paleozoic Elk Point Basin, Saskatchewan, Canada: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 1619-1629.

Koehler, G. D., 1997, The Geochemistry and Petrogenesis of Carnallite and its Relationship to the Diagenesis of the Devonian Prairie Formation: PhD thesis, University of Saskatchewan.

Koehler, G. D., T. K. Kyser, and T. Danyluk, 1990, Stable Isotope evidence for the petrogenesis of carnallite In the Middle Devonian Prairie Evaporile Formation, Saskatchewan: Summary of Investigations 1990, Saskatchewan Geological Survey; Saskatchewan Energy and Mines, Miscellaneous Report 90-04.

Liu, C., Y. Ji, Y. Bai, F. Cheng, and X. Lu, 2007, Formation of porous crystals by coupling of dissolution and nucleation process in fractional crystallization: Fluid Phase Equilib, v. 261, p. 300-305.

Lowenstein, T., B. Kendall, and A. D. Anbar, 2014, Chapter 8.21. The Geologic History of Seawater, Treatise on Geochemistry (2nd Edition), Elsevier, p. 569-621.

Lowenstein, T. K., 1988, Origin of depositional cycles in a Permian ''saline giant''; the Salado (McNutt Zone) evaporites of New Mexico and Texas: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 100, p. 592-608.

Lowenstein, T. K., and R. J. Spencer, 1990, Syndepositional origin of potash evaporites; petrographic and fluid inclusion evidence: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 43-106.

Ma, L., T. K. Lowenstein, B. Li, P. Jiang, C. Liu, J. Zhong, J. Sheng, H. Qiu, and H. Wu, 2010, Hydrochemical characteristics and brine evolution paths of Lop Nor Basin, Xinjiang Province, Western China: Applied Geochemistry, v. 25, p. 1770-1782.

Mackintosh, A. D., and G. A. McVittie, 1983, Geological anomalies observed at the Cominco Ltd. Saskatchewan potash mine: Potash '83; Potash technology; mining, processing, maintenance, transportation, occupational health and safety, environment., p. 59-64.

Matthews, R. D., and G. C. Egleson, 1974, Origin and Implications of a Mid-Basin Potash Facies in the Salina Salt of Michigan, Fourth International Symposium on Salt, v. 1, Northern Ohio Geological Society, p. 15-34.

McIntosh, R. A., and N. C. Wardlaw, 1968, Barren halite bodies in the sylvinite mining zone at Esterhazy, Saskatchewan: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 5, p. 1221-1238.

Mossman, D. J., R. N. Delabio, and A. D. Mackintosh, 1982, Mineralogy of clay marker seams in some Saskatchewan potash mines: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 19, p. 2126-2140.

Mossop, G., and I. Shetsen, 1994, Geological Atlas of the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists and Alberta Research Council, 504 p.

Prud'homme, M., and S. T. Krukowski, 2006, Potash, in J. E. Kogel, N. C. Trivedi, J. M. Barker, and S. T. Krukowski, eds., Industrial Minerals and Rocks, SME (Soc. Mining Metallurgy and Exploration), p. 723-742.

Richter-Bernburg, G., 1986, Zechstein 1 and 2 anhydrites; facts and problems of sedimentation, in G. M. Harwood, and D. B. Smith, eds., The English Zechstein and related topics, v. 22: London, UK, Geological Society Special Publication, p. 157-163.

Rogers, M. B., and B. Pratt, 2017, Stratigraphy of the Middle Devonian Keg River and Prairie Evaporite formations, northeast Alberta, Canada: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 65, p. 5-63.

Root, K. G., 2001, Devonian Antler Fold and Thrust Belt and Foreland Basin Development in the Southern Canadian Cordillera: Implications for the Western Canada Sedimentary Basin: Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, v. 49, p. 7-36.

Rosell, L., and F. Ortí, 1981, The saline (potash) formation of the Navarra basin (Upper Eocene, Spain). Petrology: Revista Instituto Investigaciones Geologicas, v. 35, p. 71-121.

Rouchy, J.-M., 1997, Paleogene Continental Rift System of Western Europe: locations of basins, paleogeographic and structural framework, and the distribution of evaporites: In: Busson, G., Schreiber, B.C. (Eds.), Sedimentary Deposition in Rift and Foreland Basins in France and Spain (Paleogene and Lower Neogene). Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 45–94.

Schofield, N., I. Alsop, J. Warren, J. R. Underhill, R. Lehné, W. Beer, and V. Lukas, 2014, Mobilizing salt: Magma-salt interactions: Geology, v. 42, p. 599-602.

Schwerdtner, W. M., 1964, Genesis of potash rocks in Middle Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation of Saskatchewan: Bulletin American Association Petroleum Geologists, v. 48, p. 1108-1115.

Schwerdtner, W. M., 1964, Genesis of potash rocks in Middle Devonian Prairie Evaporite Formation of Saskatchewan: Bulletin American Association Petroleum Geologists, v. 48, p. 1108-1115.

Smith, D. B., 1996, Deformation in the late Permian Boulby Halite (EZ3Na) in Teesside, NE England: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 100, p. 77-87.

Smith, D. B., and A. Crosby, 1979, The regional and stratigraphical context of Zechstein 3 and 4 potash deposits in the British sector of the southern North Sea and adjoining land areas: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 397-408.

Steinmann, M., P. Stille, W. Bernotat, and B. Knipping, 1999, The corrosion of basaltic dykes in evaporites: Ar-Sr-Nd isotope and rare earth elements evidence: Chemical Geology, v. 153, p. 259-279.

Szatmari, P., R. S. Carvalho, and I. A. Simoes, 1979, A comparison of evaporite facies in the late Paleozoic Amazon and the Middle Cretaceous South Atlantic salt basins: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 432-447.

Valyashko, M. G., 1972, Playa lakes, a necessary stage in the development of a salt-bearing basin [with discussion]: Geology of saline deposits, Unesco Earth Sci. Ser., p. 41-51.

van't Hoff, J. H., 1912, Untersuchungen Uber die Bildungsurhältnisse der ozeanischen Salzablangerungen, insbesondere das Stassfurter Salzlagers: Leipzig.

Voigt, W., 2015, What we know and still not know about oceanic salts: Pure Appl. Chem., v. 87, p. 1099-1026.

Volozh, Y., C. J. Talbot, and A. Ismail-Zadeh, 2003, Salt structures and hydrocarbons in the Pricaspian basin: Bulletin American Association Petroleum Geologists, v. 87, p. 313-334.

Wall, M., J. Cartwright, R. Davies, and A. McGrandle, 2010, 3D seismic imaging of a Tertiary Dyke Swarm in the Southern North Sea, UK: Basin Research, v. 22, p. 181-194.

Wardlaw, N. C., 1968, Carnallite-sylvite relationships in the middle Devonian Prairie evaporite formation, Saskatchewan: Geological Society America Bulletin, v. 79, p. 1273-1294.

Wardlaw, N. C., 1972a, Unusual marine evaporites with salts of calcium and magnesium chloride in Cretaceous basins of Sergipe, Brazil: Economic Geology, v. 67, p. 156-168.

Wardlaw, N. C., 1972b, Syn-sedimentary folds and associated structures in Cretaceous salt deposits of Sergipe, Brazil: J. Sediment. Petrol., v. 42, p. 572-577.

Wardlaw, N. C., and G. D. Nicholls, 1972, Cretaceous Evaporites of Brazil and West Africa and their Bearing on the Theory of Continent Separation.: 24th Inter. Geol. Congr., v. 6, p. 43-55.

Wardlaw, N. C., and D. W. Watson, 1966, Middle Devonian salt formations and their bromide content, Elk Point area, Alberta: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, v. 3, p. 263-275.

Warren, J. K., 2000, Geological controls on the quality of potash, in R. M. Geertmann, ed., 8th World Salt Symposium, v. 1: Amsterdam, Elsevier, p. 173-180.

Warren, J. K., 2010, Evaporites through time: Tectonic, climatic and eustatic controls in marine and nonmarine deposits: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 98, p. 217-268.

Warren, J. K., 2011, Evaporitic source rocks: mesohaline responses to cycles of “famine or feast” in layered brines, Doug Shearman Memorial Volume, (Wiley-Blackwell) IAS Special Publication Number 43, p. 315-392.

Warren, J. K., 2016, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3): Berlin, Springer, 1854 p.

Warren, J. K., 2017, Salt usually seals, but sometimes leaks: Implications for mine and cavern stabilities in the short and long term: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 165, p. 302-341.

Williams-Stroud, S. C., 1994, Solution to the Paradox? Results of some chemical equilibrium and mass balance calculations applied to the Paradox Basin evaporite deposit: American Journal of Science, v. 294, p. 1189-1228.

Wittrup, M. B., and T. K. Kyser, 1990, The petrogenesis of brines in Devonian potash deposits of western Canada: Chemical Geology, v. 82, p. 103-128.

Woods, P. J. E., 1979, The geology of Boulby Mine: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 409-418.

Worsley, N., and A. Fuzesy, 1979, The potash-bearing members of the Devonian Prairie Evaporite of southeastern Saskatchewan, south of the mining area: Economic Geology, v. 74, p. 377-388.

Xia, S. P., X. L. Hong, and S. Y. Gao, 1993, Study on the dissolution kinetics and mechanism of carnallite and KC (in Chinese with English abstract): Journal Salt Lake Research, v. 1, p. 52-60.

Yang, C., G. Jensen, and J. Berenyi, 2009, The Stratigraphic Framework of the Potash-rich Members of the Middle Devonian Upper Prairie Evaporite Formation, Saskatchewan: Summary of Investigations 2009, Saskatchewan Geological Survey; Misc. Rep. 2009-4.1, 28 p.

Zak, I., 1997, Evolution of the Dead Sea brines, in T. M. Niemi, Z. Ben-Avraham, and J. R. Gat, eds., The Dead Sea, The Lake and Its Setting, v. 36: Oxford, Oxford University Press; Monographs on Geology and Geophysics, p. 133-144.

Zharkov, M. A., 1984, Paleozoic salt bearing formations of the world: Berlin, Springer Verlag, 427 p.

 

Brine evolution and origins of potash: primary or secondary? SOP in Quaternary saline lakes: Part 2 of 2

John Warren - Friday, November 30, 2018

 


Introduction

This, the second in this series of articles on potash brine evolution deals with production of sulphate of potash in plants that exploit saline hydrologies hosted in Quaternary saline sumps. There are two settings where significant volumes of sulphate of potash salts are economically produced at the current time; the Ogden salt pans on the northeast shore of the Great Salt Lake in Utah and Lop Nur in China. Although potassium sulphate salts precipitate if modern seawater is evaporated to the bittern stage, as yet there is no operational SOP plant utilising seawater. This is due to concurrent elevated levels of magnesium and chlorine in the bittern, a combination that favours the precipitation of carnallite concurrently with the precipitation of double sulphate salts, such as kainite (Figure 1). Until now, this makes the processing of the multi-mineralogic precipitate for a pure SOP product too expensive when utilising a marine brine feed.

 

Potash in Great Salt Lake, USA (SOP evolution with backreactions)

Today sulphate of potash fertiliser is produced via a combination of solar evaporation and brine processing, using current waters of the Great Salt Lake, Utah, as the brine feed into the Ogden salt pans, which are located at the northeastern end of the Great Salt Lake depression in Utah (Figure 2a). A simpler anthropogenic muriate of potash (MOP) brine evolution occurs in the nearby Wendover salt pans on the Bonneville salt flats. There, MOP precipitates as sylvinite in concentrator pans (after halite). The Bonneville region has a bittern hydrochemistry not unlike like the evolved Na-Cl brines of Salar de Atacama, as documented in the previous article, but it is a brinefield feed without the elevated levels of lithium seen in the Andean playa (Figure 3b).

Great Salt Lake brine contains abundant sulphate with levels sufficiently above calcium that sulphate continues to concentrate after most of the Ca has been used up in the precipitation of both aragonite and gypsum. Thus, as the brines in the anthropogenic pans at Ogden approach the bittern (post halite) stage, a series of sulphate double salts precipitate (Figure 4), along with carnallite and sylvite.


Great Salt Lake brines

The ionic proportions in the primary brine feed that is the endorheic Great Salt Lake water depends on a combination of; 1) the inflow volumes from three major rivers draining the ranges to the east, 2) groundwater inflow, 3) basin evaporation, and 4) precipitation (rainfall/snowfall) directly on the lake (Jones et al., 2009). Major solute inputs can be attributed to calcium bicarbonate-type river waters mixing with sodium chloride-type springs, which are in part hydrothermal and part peripheral recycling agents for NaCl held in the lake sediments. Spencer et al. (1985a) noted that prior to 1930, the lake concentration inversely tracked lake volume, which reflected climatic variation in the drainage. However, since that time, salt precipitation, primarily halite and mirabilite, and dissolution have periodically modified lake brine chemistry and led to density stratification and the formation of brine pockets of different composition.

Complicating these processes is repeated fractional crystallisation and re-solution (backreaction) of lake mineral precipitates. The construction of a railway causeway has restricted circulation, nearly isolating the northern from the southern part of the lake, which receives over 95% of the inflow. Given that Great Salt Lake waters are dominated by Na and Cl, this has led to halite precipitation in the north (Figures 2a, 3a; Gwynn, 2002). Widespread halite precipitation also occurred before 1959, especially in the southern area of the lake, associated with the most severe droughts (Jones et al., 2009; Spencer et al., 1985a). Spencer et al. (1985a) also described the presence of a sublacustrine ridge, which probably separated the lake into two basins at very low lake stands in the Quaternary. Fluctuating conditions emphasise brine differentiation, mixing, and fractional precipitation of salts as significant factors in solute evolution, especially as sinks for CaCO3, Mg, and K in the lake waters and sediments. The evolution of these brine/rock system depends on the concentration gradient and types of suspended and bottom clays, especially in relatively shallow systems.


Brine evolution across the Ogden pans

Figure 3a plots the known hydrochemistry of the inflow waters to the Great Salt Lake and their subsequent concentration. Evolving lake waters are always Na-Cl dominant, with sulphate in excess of magnesium in excess of potassium, throughout. Any post-halite evaporite minerals from this set of chemical proportions will contain post-halite potash bittern salts with elevated proportions of sulphate and magnesium and so will likely produce SOP rather than MOP associations. Contrast these hydrochemical proportions with the inflow and evolution chemistry in the pore brines of the Bonneville salt flat (Figure 3b) the Dead Sea and normal marine waters. Across all examples, sodium and chlorine are dominant and so halite will be the predominant salt deposited after aragonite and gypsum (Figure 4). Specifically, there are changes in sulphate levels with solar concentration (Figure 3b). In brines recovered from feeder wells in the Bonneville saltflat, unlike the nearby bajada well waters, the Bonneville salt flat brines show potassium in excess of sulphate and magnesium. In such a hydrochemical system, sylvite, as well as carnallite, are likely potassium bitterns in post-halite pans. The Wendover brine pans on the Bonneville saltflat produce MOP, not SOP, along with a MgCl2 brine, and have done so for more than 50 years (Bingham, 1980; Warren, 2016).


The mineral series in the Ogden pans

Figure 5 illustrates a laboratory-based construction of the idealised evolution of a Great Salt Lake feed brine as it passes through the various concentration pans. Figure 5 is a portion of the theoretical 25°C sulphate-potassium-magnesium phase diagram for the Great Salt Lake brine system and shows precipitates that are in equilibrium with brine at a particular concentration. Figures 4 and 5 represent typical brine concentration paths at summertime temperatures (Butts, 2002). Importantly, these figures do not describe the entire brine concentration story and local variations; mineralogical complexities in the predicted brine stream are related to thermal stratification, retention times and pond leakage. Effects on the chemistry of the brine due to the specific day-by-day and season-by-season variations of concentration and temperature, which arise in any solar ponding operation, require onsite monitoring and rectification. Such ongoing monitoring is of fundamental import when a pilot plant is constructed to test the reality of a future brine plant and its likely products.

 

Figure 6 illustrates the idealised phase evolution of pan brines at Ogden in terms of a K2SO4 phase diagram (no NaCl or KCl co-precipitates are shown; Felton et al., 2010). Great Salt Lake brine is pumped into the first set of solar ponds where evaporation initially proceeds along the line shown as Evap 1 until halite reaches saturation and is precipitated. Liquors discharged from the halite ponds are transferred to the potash precipitation ponds where solar evaporation continues as line Evap 2 on the phase diagram and potassium begins to reach saturation after about 75% of the water is removed. Potassium, sodium levels rise with further evaporation and schoenite precipitates in the schoenite crystalliser. After some schoenite precipitation occurs, the liquor continues to evaporate along the Evap 3 line to the point that schoenite, sylvite, and additional halite precipitate. Evaporation continues as shown by line Evap 3 to the point that kainite, sylvite and halite become saturated and precipitate. From this plot, the importance of the relative levels of extraction/precipitation of sulphate double salts versus chloride double salts is evident, as the evaporation plot point moves right with increasing chloride concentrations. That is, plot point follows the arrows from left to right as concentration of chloride (dominant ion in all pans) increases and moves the plot position right.


Production of SOP in the Great Salt Lake

To recover sulphate of potash commercially from pan bitterns fed from the waters of Great Salt Lake, the double salts kainite and schoenite are first precipitated and recovered in post-halite solar ponds (Figures 6, 7). The first salt to saturate and crystallise in the concentrator pans is halite. This is successively followed by epsomite, schoenite, kainite, carnallite, and finally bischofite. To produce a desirable SOP product requires ongoing in-pan monitoring and an on-site industrial plant whereby kainite is converted to schoenite. The complete salt evolution and processing plant outcome in the Ogden facility is multiproduct and can produce halite, salt cake and sulphate of potash and a MgCl2 brine product. Historically, sodium sulphate was recovered from the Great Salt Lake brines as a byproduct of the halite and potash production process, but ongoing low prices mean Na2SO4 has not been economically harvested for the last decade or so.

The complete production and processing procedure is as follows (Figure 7; Butts, 2002, 2007; Felton et al., 2010): 1) Brine is pumped from the Great Salt Lake into solar evaporation ponds where sodium chloride precipitates in the summer. 2) When winter weather cools the residual (post-halite) brine in the pans to -1 to -4°C, sodium sulphate crystals precipitate as mirabilite in a relatively pure state. Mirabilite crystals can be picked up by large earth-moving machinery and stored outdoors each winter until further processing takes place. 3) The harvested mirabilite can be added to hot water, and anhydrous sodium sulphate precipitated by the addition of sodium chloride to the heated mix to reduce sodium sulphate solubility through the common ion effect. The final salt cake product is 99.5% pure Na2SO4. 4) To produce SOP, Great Salt Lake brines are allowed to evaporate in a set of halite ponds, until approaching saturation with potassium salts. The residual brine is then transferred to a mixing pond, where it mixes with a second brine (from higher up the evaporation series, that contains a higher molar ratio of magnesium to potassium. 5) This adjusted brine is then allowed to evaporate to precipitate sodium chloride once more, until it is again saturated with respect to potassium salts. 6) The saturated brine is then transferred to another pond, is further evaporated and precipitates kainite (Figures 5, 6). Kainite precipitation continues until carnallite begins to form, at which time the brine is moved to another pond and is allowed to evaporate further to precipitate carnallite. 6) Some of the kainite-depleted brine is recycled to the downstream mixing pond to maintain the required molar ratio of magnesium to calcium in this earlier mixing pond (step 4). 7) Once carnallite has precipitated, the residual brine is transferred to deep storage and subjected to winter cooling to precipitate additional carnallite as it is a prograde salt. 8) Cryogenically precipitated carnallite can be processed to precipitate additional kainite by mixing it with a kainite-saturated brine. 9) MgCl2-rich end-brines in the post-carnallite bittern pans are then further processed to produce either MgCl2 flakes or a 32% MgCl2 brine. These end-bitterns are then used as a feedstock to make magnesium metal, bischofite flakes, dust suppressants, freeze preventers, fertiliser sprays, and used to refresh flush in ion exchange resins.

Some complexities in the observed mineral precipitation series in the Ogden Pans

Under natural solar pond conditions in the Ogden Pans, the brine temperature fluctuates with the air temperature across day-night and seasonal temperature cycles, and there is a lag time for temperature response in waters any brine pan, especially if the pan is heliothermic. Atmosphere-driven fluctuations in temperature results in changes in ion saturations, which can drive selective precipitation or dissolution of salts in the brine body. Air temperature in the Ogden pans may be 35°C during the day and 15°C at night. Brine at point A in figure 5 may favour the formation of kainite during the daytime and schoenite at night. The result of the diurnal temperature oscillation is a mixture of both salts in a single pond from the same brine. In terms of extracted product, this complicates ore processing as a single pan will contain both minerals, produced at the same curing stage, at the same time, yet one double salt entrains KCl, the other K2SO4, so additional processing is necessary to purify the product stream (Butts, 2002).

The sulphate ion in the pan waters is particularity temperature sensitive, and salts containing it in GSL pans tend to precipitate at cooler temperatures. Surficial cooling during the summer nights can cause prograde salts to precipitate, but the next day's heat generally provides sufficient activation energy to cause total dissolution of those salts precipitated just a few hours before (Butts, 2002). It is not unusual to find a 0.5 cm layer of hexahydrite (MgSO4.6H2O) at the bottom of a solar pond in the morning, but redissolved by late afternoon.

Under controlled laboratory conditions, brine collected from the hypersaline north arm of the Great Salt Lake will not crystallise mirabilite  until the brine temperature reaches 2°C or lower. Yet, in the anthropogenic solar ponds, mirabilite has been observed to crystallise at brine temperatures above 7°C. During the winter, as the surface temperature of the GSL pan brine at night becomes very cold (2°C or lower), especially on clear nights, and mirabilite rafts will form on and just below the brine surface and subsequently sink into the somewhat warmer brine at the floor of the pond. Because there is insufficient activation energy in this brine to completely redissolve the mirabilite, it remains on the pan floor, until warmer day/night temperatures are attained. However, it is also possible for salts precipitated by cooling to be later covered by salts precipitated by evaporation, which effectively prevents dissolution of those more temperature-sensitive salts that would otherwise redissolve (Butts, 2002).

There are also longer terms seasonal influences on mineralogy. Some salts deposited in June, July, and August (summer) will convert to other salts, with a possible total change in chemistry, when they are exposed to colder winter temperatures and rainfall. Kainite, for example, may convert to sylvite and epsomite and become a hardened mass on the pond floor; or if it is in contact with a sulphate-rich brine, it can convert to schoenite. Conversely, mirabilite will precipitate in the winter but redissolve during the hot summer months.

The depth of a solar pond also controls the size of the crystals produced. For example, if halite (NaCl) is precipitated in a GSL pond that is either less than 8 cm or more than 30cm deep, it will have a smaller crystal size than when precipitated in a pond between 8 and 30 cm deep. Smaller crystals of halite are undesirable in a de-icing product since a premium price is paid for larger crystals.

In terms of residence time, some salts require more time than others to crystallise in a pan. Brine that is not given sufficient time for crystallisation before it is moved into another pond, which contains brine at a different concentration, will produce a different suite of salts. For example, if a brine supersaturated in ions that will produce kainite, epsomite, and halite (reaction I), is transferred to another pond, the resulting brine mixture can favour carnallite (reaction 2), while kainite salts are eliminated.

Reaction 1: 9.75H2O + Na+ + 2Cl- + 2Mg2+ + K+ + 2SO42+ —> MgSO4.KCl +2.75H2O + MgSO4.7H2O + NaCl

Reaction 2: 12H2O + Na+ + 4Cl- + 2Mg2+ + K+ + 2SO42+ —> MgCl2.6H2O +MgSO4.6H2O + NaCl

Reaction 1 retains more magnesium as MgCl2 in the brine; reaction 2 retains more sulphate. In reaction 2, it is also interesting to note the effect of waters-of-hydration on crystallization; forcing out salts with high waters of crystallization results in higher rates of crystallization. The hydrated salts remove waters from the brine and further concentrate the brine in much the same way as does evaporation.

Pond leakage and brine capture (entrainment) in and below the pan floor are additional influences on mineralogy, regardless of brine depth or ponding area. As mentioned earlier, to precipitate bischofite and allow for MgCl2 manufacture, around ninety-eight percent of the water from present North Arm brine feed must evaporate. If pond leakage causes the level of the ponding area to drop too quickly, it becomes near impossible to reach saturation for bischofite (due to brine reflux). Control of pond leakage in the planning and construction phases is essential to assure that the precipitated salts contain the optimal quantity of the desired minerals for successful pond operation.

The opposite of leakage is brine retention in a precipitated layer; it can also alter brine chemistry and recovery economics. Brine entrained (or trapped) in the voids between salt crystals in the pond floor is effectively removed from salt production and so affects the chemistry of salts that will be precipitated as concentration proceeds and can also drive unwanted backreactions. The time required to evaporate nearly ninety percent of the water from the present north arm Great Salt Lake brine in the Ogden solar pond complex, under natural steady state conditions, is approximately eighteen months.

Summary of SOP production procedures in Great Salt Lake

Sulphate of potash cannot be obtained from the waters of the Great Salt Lake by simple solar evaporation (Behrens, 2002). As the lake water is evaporated, first halite precipitates in a relatively pure form and is harvested. By the time evaporative concentration has proceeded to the point that saturation in a potash-entraining salt occurs, most of the NaCl has precipitated. It does, however, continue to precipitate and becomes the primary contaminant in the potassium-bearing salt beds in the higher-end pans.

Brine phase chemistry from the point of potassium saturation in the evaporation series is complicated, and an array of potassium double salts are possible, depending on brine concentration, temperature and other factors. Among the variety of potash minerals precipitated in the potash harvester pans, the majority are double salts that contain atoms of both potassium and magnesium in the same molecule, They are dominated by kainite, schoenite, and carnallite. All are highly hydrated; that is, they contain high levels of water of crystallisation that must be removed during processing. SOP purification also involves removal of the considerable quantities of sodium chloride that are co-precipitated, after this the salts must be chemically converted into potassium sulphate.

Controlling the exact mineralogy of the precipitated salts and their composition mixtures is not possible in the pans, which are subject to the vagaries of climate and associated temperature variations. Many of the complex double salts precipitating in the pans are stable only under fixed physiochemical conditions, so that transitions of composition may take place in the ponds and even in the stockpile and early processing plant steps.

While weathering, draining, temperature and other factors can be controlled to a degree, it is essential that the Great Salt Lake plant be able to handle and effectively accommodate a widely variable feed mix (Behrens 2002). To do this, the plant operator has developed a basic process comprising a counter-current leach procedure for converting the potassium-bearing minerals through known mineral transition stages to a final potassium sulfate product (Figure 7). This set of processing steps is sensitive to sodium chloride content, so a supplemental flotation circuit is used to handle those harvested salts high in halite. It aims to remove the halite (in solution) and upgrade the feed stream to the point where it can be handled by the basic plant process.

Solids harvested from the potash ponds with elevated halite levels are treated with anionic flotation to remove remaining halite (Felton et al., 2010). To convert kainite into schoenite, it is necessary to mix the upgraded flotation product with a prepared brine. The conversion of schoenite to SOP at the Great Salt Lake plant requires that new MOP is added, over the amount produced from the lake brines. This additional MOP is purchased from the open market. The schoenite solids are mixed with potash in a draft tube baffle reactor to produce SOP and byproduct magnesium chloride.

The potassium sulfate processing stream defining the basic treatment process in the Great Salt Lake plant is summarised as Figure 7, whereby once obtaining the appropriate chemistry the SOP product is ultimately filtered, dried, sized and stored. Final SOP output may then be compacted, graded, and provided with additives as desired, then distributed in bulk or bagged, by rail or truck.


Lop Nur, Tarim Basin, China (SOP operation)

Sulphate of potash (SOP) via brine processing (solution mining) of lake sediments and subsequent solar concentration of brines is currently underway in the fault-bound Luobei Hollow region of the Lop Nur playa, in the southeastern part of Xinjiang Province, Western China (Liu et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2018). The recoverable sulphate of potash resource is estimated to be 36 million tonnes from lake brine (Dong et al., 2012). Lop Nur lies in the eastern part of the Taklimakan Desert (Figure 8a), China’s largest and driest desert, and is in the drainage sump of the basin, some 780 meters above sea level in a BSk climate belt. The Lop Nur depression first formed in the early Quaternary, due to the extensional collapse of the eastern Tarim Platform and is surrounded and typically in fault contact with the Kuruktagh (to the north), Bei Shan (to east) and Altun (to the south) mountains (Figure 8b).

The resulting Lop Nur (Lop Nor) sump is a large groundwater discharge playa that is the terminal point of China’s largest endorheic drainage system, the Tarim Basin, which occupies an area of more than 530,000 km2 (Ma et al., 2010). The Lop Nur sump is the hydrographic base level to local and regional groundwater and surface water flow systems, and thus collectively captures all river and subsurface flow originating in the surrounding mountainous regions. The area has been subject to ongoing Quaternary climate and water supply oscillations, which over the last few hundred years has driven concentric strandzone contractions on the playa surface, to form what is sometimes called the “Great Ear Lake" of the Lop Nur sump (Liu et al., 2016a).

Longer term widespread climate oscillations (thousands of years) drove precipitation of saline glauberite-polyhalite deposits, alternating with more humid lacustrine mudstones especially in fault defined grabens with the sump. For example, Liu et al. (2016b) conducted high-resolution multi-proxy analyses using materials from a well-dated pit section (YKD0301) in the centre of Lop Nur and south of the Luobei depression. They showed that Lop Nur experienced a progression through a brackish lake, saline lake, slightly brackish lake, saline lake, brackish lake, and playa in response to climatic changes over the past 9,000 years.

Presently, the Lop Nur playa lacks perennial long-term surface inflow and so is characterised by desiccated saline mudflats and polygonal salt crusts. The upward capillary flux from the shallow groundwater helps to maintain a high rate of evaporation in the depression and drives the formation of a metre-thick ephemeral halite crust that covers much of the depression (Liu et al., 2016a).

Historically, before construction of extensive irrigation systems in the upstream portion of the various riverine feeds to the depression and the diversion of water into the Tarim-Kongqi-Qargan canal, brackish floodwaters periodically accumulated in the Lop Nur depression. After the diversion of inflows, terminal desiccation led to the formation of the concentric shrinkage shorelines, that today outline the “Great Ear Lake” region of the Tarim Basin (Figure 8b; Huntington, 1907; Chao et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2016a).

The current climate is cool and extremely arid (Koeppen BSk); average annual rainfall is less than 20 mm and the average potential evaporation rates ≈3500 mm/yr (Ma et al., 2008, 2010). The mean annual air temperature is 11.6°C; higher temperatures occur during July (>40°C), and the lower temperatures occur during January (<20°C). Primary wind direction is northeast. The Lop Nor Basin experiences severe and frequent sandstorms; the region is well known for its wind-eroded features, including many layered yardangs along the northern, western and eastern margins of the Lop Nur salt plain (Lin et al., 2018).


Salinity and chemical composition of modern groundwater brine varies little in the ‘‘Great Ear” area and appears not to have changed significantly over the last decade (Ma et al., 2010). Dominant river inflows to the Lop Nor Basin are Na-Mg-Ca-SO4-Cl-HCO3 waters (Figure 9). In contrast, the sump region is characterised by highly concentrated groundwater brines (≈350 mg/l) that are rich in Na and Cl, poor in Ca and HCO3+CO3, and contain considerable amounts of Mg, SO4 and K, with pH ranging from 6.6 to 7.2 (Figure 9). When concentrated, the Luobei/Lop Nur pore brines is saturated with respect to halite, glauberite, thenardite, polyhalite and bloedite (Ma et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2018).

Groundwater brines, pooled in the northern sub-depression, mostly in the Luobei depression, are pumped into a series of pans to the immediate south, where sulphate of potash is produced via a set of solar concentrator pans. Brines in the Luobei depression and adjacent Xingqing and Tenglong platforms are similar in chemistry and salinity to the Great Ear Lake area but with a concentrated saline reserve due to the presence of a series of buried glauberite-rich beds (Figure 9; Hu and Wang, 2001; Ma et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2018).

K-rich mother brines in the Luobei hollow also contain significant MgSO4 levels and fill open phreatic pores in a widespread subsurface glauberite bed, with a potassium content of 1.4% (Liu et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2018). Feed brines are pumped from these evaporitic sediment hosts in the Luobei sump into a large field of concentrator pans to ultimately produce sulphate of potash (Figure 8a).

Brine chemical models, using current inflow water and groundwater brine chemistries and assuming open-system hydrology, show good agreement between theoretically predicted and observed minerals in upper parts of the Lop Nor Basin succession (Ma et al., 2010). However, such shallow sediment modelling does not explain the massive amounts of glauberite (Na2SO4.CaSO4) and polyhalite (K2SO4MgSO4.2CaSO4.2H2O) recovered in a 230 m deep core (ZK1200B well) from the Lop Nor Basin (Figure 9a).


Hydrochemical simulations assuming a closed system at depth and allowing brine reactions with previously formed minerals imply that widespread glauberite in the basin formed via back reactions between brine, gypsum and anhydrite and that polyhalite formed via a diagenetic reaction between brine and glauberite. Diagenetic textures related to recrystallisation and secondary replacement are seen in the ZK1200B core; they include gypsum-cored glauberite crystals and gypsum replacing glauberite. Such textures indicate significant mineral-brine interaction and backreaction during crystallisation of glauberite and polyhalite (Liu et al., 2008). Much of the glauberite dissolves to create characteristic mouldic porosity throughout the glauberite reservoir intervals (Figure 10, 11b)


Mineral assemblages predicted from the evaporation of Tarim river water match closely with natural assemblages and abundances and, in combination with a model that allows widespread backreactions, can explain the extensive glauberite deposits in the Lop Nor basin (Ma et al., 2008, 2010). It seems that the Tarim river inflows, not fault-controlled upwelling hydrothermal brines, were the dominant ion source throughout the lake history. The layered distribution of minerals in the more deeply cored sediments documents the evolving history of inflow water response to wet and dry periods in the Lop Nor basin. The occurrence of abundant glauberite and gypsum below 40 m depth, and the absence of halite, polyhalite and bloedite in the same sediment suggests that the brine underwent incomplete concentration in the wetter periods 10b).

In contrast, the increasing abundance of halite, polyhalite and bloedite in the top 40 m of core from the ZK1200B well indicate relatively dry periods (Figure 10a), where halite precipitated at lower evaporative concentrations (log Concentration factor = 3.15), while polyhalite and bloedite precipitated at higher evaporative concentrations (log = 3.31 and 3.48 respectively). Following deposition of the more saline minerals, the lake system once again became more humid in the later Holocene, until the anthropogenically-induced changes in the hydrology over the last few decades, driven by upstream water damming and extraction for agriculture (Ma et al., 2008). These changes have returned the sump hydrology to the more saline character that it had earlier in the Pleistocene.

The Lop Nur potash recovery plant/factory and pan system, located adjacent to the LuoBei depression (Figures 8, 11a), utilises a brine-well source aquifer where the potash brine is reservoired in intercrystalline and vuggy porosity in a thick stacked series of porous glauberite beds/aquifers.

Currently, 200 boreholes have been drilled in the Lop Nor brine field area showing the Late-Middle Pleistocene to Late Pleistocene strata are distributed as massive, continuous, thick layers of glauberite with well-developed intercrystal and mouldic porosity, forming storage space for potassium-rich brine (Figure 11b; Sun et al., 2018). However, buried faults and different rates of creation of fault-bound accommodation space, means there are differences in the brine storage capacity among the three brinefield extraction areas; termed the Luobei depression, the Xingqing platform and the Tenglong platform areas (Figures 9a, 11a).

In total, there are seven glauberitic brine beds defined by drill holes in the Luobei depression, including a phreatic aquifer, W1L, and six artesian aquifers, W2L, W3L, W4L, W5L, W6L, and W7 (Figure 10b; Sun et al., 2018). At present, only W1L, W2L, W3L, and W4L glauberite seams are used as brine sources. There are two artesian brine aquifers, W2X and W3X, exposed by drill holes in the Xinqing platform and there are three beds in the Tenglong extraction area, including a phreatic aquifer, W1T, and two artesian aquifers, W2T and W3T (Figure 10b).

W1L is a phreatic aquifer with layered distribution across the whole Luobei depression, with an average thickness of 17.54 m, water table depths of 1.7 to 2.3 m, porosities of 6.98% to 38.45%, and specific yields of 4.57% to 25.89%. Water yield is the highest in the central and northeast of the depression, with unit brine overflows of more than 5000 cubic meters per day per meter of water table depth (m3/dm). In the rest of the aquifer, the unit brine overflows range from 1000 to 5000 m3/dm (Sun et al., 2018). The W2L artesian aquifer is confined, nearly horizontal with a stratified distribution, and has an average thickness of 10.18 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 20 to 40 m, porosities of 4.34% to 37.8%, and specific yields of 1.08% to 21.04%. The W3L artesian aquifer is confined, with stratified distribution and an average thickness of 8.50 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 40 to 70 m, porosities of 2.85% to 19.97%, and specific yields of 1.10% to 13.37%. The W3L aquifer is also confined with stratified distribution, with an average thickness of 7.28 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 70 to 100 m, porosities of 5.22% to 24.72%, and specific yields of 1.03% to 9.91%. The lithologies of the four brine storage layers are dominated by glauberite, and occasional lacustrine sedimentary clastic rocks, such as gypsum (Figure 10a).

The Xinqing platform consists of two confined potassium-bearing brine aquifers (Figure 10b). Confined brines have layered or stratified distributions. The average thicknesses of the aquifers are 4.38 to 7.52 m. Due to the F1 fault, there is no phreatic aquifer in the Xinqing platform, but this does not affect the continuity of the brine storage layer between the extraction areas. The W2X aquifer is confined, stratified, and distributed in the eastern part of this ore district with a north-south length of 77.78 km, east-west width of 16.82 km, and total area of 1100 km2. Unit brine overflows are 2.25 to 541.51 m3/dm, water table depths are 10 to 20 m, porosities are 3.89% to 40.69%, and specific yields are 2.01% to 21.15%. The W3X aquifer is also confined and stratified, with a north-south length of 76.10 km, east-west width of 18.81 km, and total area of 1444 km2. Unit brine overflows are 1.67 to 293.99 m3/d m, water table depths are 11.3 to 38 m, porosities are 4.16% to 26.43%, and specific yields are 2.11% to 14.19%23.

The Tenglong platform consists of a phreatic aquifer and two confined aquifers. W1T is a phreatic, stratified aquifer and is the main ore body, and is bound by the F3 fault (Figure 10b). It is distributed across the northern part of the Tenglong extraction area, with a north-south length of about 33 km, east-west width of about 20 km, and total area of 610 km2. Water table depths are 3.26 to 4.6 m, porosities are 2.03% to 38.81%, and specific yields are 22.48% to 1.22%. On the other side of the F3 fault, in the southern part of the mining area, is the W2T confined aquifer (Figure 10b). Water table depths are 16.91 to 22 m, porosities are 3.58% to 37.64%, and specific yields are 1.35% to 18.69%. W3T is also a confined aquifer, with a stratified orebody distributed in the southern part of the mining area, with a north-south length of about 29 km, east-west width of about 21 km, and total area of 546 km2. Water table depths are 17.13 to 47 m, porosities are 2.69% to 38.71%, and specific yields are 1.26% to 17.64%.

Lop Nur is an unusual potash source

The glauberite-hosted brinefield in the Luobei depression and the adjacent platforms makes the Lop Nur SOP system unique in that it is the world's first large-scale example of brine commercialisation for potash recovery in a Quaternary continental playa aquifer system with a non-MOP brinefield target. Elsewhere, such as in the Dead Sea and the Qarhan sump, Salar de Atacama and the Bonneville salt flats, the brines derived from Quaternary lacustrine beds and water bodies are concentrated via solar evaporation in semi-arid desert scenarios. Potash plants utilising these Quaternary evaporite-hosted lacustrine brine systems do not target potassium sulphate, but process either carnallitite or sylvinite into a commercial MOP product

 Glauberite is found in a range of other continental Quaternary evaporite deposits around the world but, as yet,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       outside of Lop Nur is not economically exploited to produce sulphate of potash. For example, glauberite is a significant component in Quaternary cryogenic beds in Karabogazgol on the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea, in Quaternary evaporite beds in Laguna del Rey in Mexico, in saline lacustrine beds in the Miocene of Spain and Turkey, and in pedogenic beds in hyperarid nitrate-rich soils of the Atacama Desert of South America (Warren, 2016; Chapter 12).

In most cases, the deposits are commercially exploited as a source of sodium sulphate (salt cake). In a saline Quaternary lake in Canada, SOP is produced by processing saline lake waters. This takes place in Quill Lake, where small volumes of SOP are produced via mixing a sylvite feed (trucked into the site) with a cryogenic NaSO4 lake brine.

The Lop Nur deposit is mined by the SDIC Xinjiang Luobupo Hoevellite Co. Ltd, and the main product is potassium sulfate, with a current annual production capacity of 1.3 million tons. Pan construction began in 2000, and the plant moved in full -cale operation in 2004 when it produced ≈50,000 tons. The parent company, State Development and Investment Corporation (SDIC), is China’s largest state-owned investment holding company. The company estimates a potash reserve ≈ 12.2 billion tons in the sump. This makes Lop Nur deposit the largest SOP facility in the world, and it is now a significant supplier of high premium fertiliser to the Chinese domestic market.

Implications

A study of a few of the Quaternary pans worldwide manufacturing economic levels of potash via solar evaporation shows tha,t independent of whether SOP or MOP salts are the main product, all retain abundant evidence that salt precipitates continue to evolve as the temperature and the encasing brine chemistry change. As we shall see in many ancient examples discussed in the next article, ongoing postdepositional mineralogical alteration dominates the textural and mineralogical story in most ancient potash deposits.

As we saw in the previous article, which focused on MOP in solar concentrator plants with brine feeds from Quaternary saline lakes, SOP production from brine feeds in Quaternary saline lakes is also related strongly to cooler desert climates (Figure 12). The Koeppen climate at Lop Nur is cool arid desert (BWk), while the Great Salt Lake straddles cool arid steppe desert and a temperate climate zone, with hot dry summer zones (BSk and Csa)


Outside of these two examples, there are a number of other Quaternary potash mineral occurrences with the potential for SOP production, if a suitable brine processing stream can be devised (Warren, 2010, 2016). These sites include intermontane depressions in the high Andes in what is a high altitude polar tundra setting (Koeppen ET), none of which are commercial (Figure 12b).

Similarly, there a number of non-commercial potash (SOP) mineral and brine occurrences in various hot arid desert regions in Australia, northern Africa and the Middle East (Koeppen BWh). Today, SOP in Salar de Atacama is currently produced as a byproduct of lithium carbonate production, along with MOP, as discussed in the previous article in this series.

As for MOP, climatically, commercial potash brine SOP systems are hosted in Quaternary-age lacustrine sediments are located in cooler endorheic intermontane depressions (BWk, BSk). The association with somewhat cooler desert and less arid cool steppe climates underlines the need for greater volumes of brine to reside in the landscape in order to facilitate the production of significant volumes of potash bittern.

Put simply, in the case of both MOP and SOP production in Quaternary settings, hot arid continental deserts simply do not have enough flowable water to produce economic volumes of a chemically-suitable mother brine. That is, currently economic Quaternary MOP and SOP operations produce by pumping nonmarine pore or saline lake brines into a set of concentrator pans. Mother waters reside in hypersaline perennial lakes in steep-sided valleys or in pores in salt-entraining aquifers with dissolving salt compositions supplying  a suitable ionic proportions in the mother brine. In terms of annual volume of product sold into the world market, Quaternary brine systems supply less than 15% The remainder comes from the mining of a variety of ancient solid-state potash sources. In the third and final article in this series, we shall discuss how and why the chemistry and hydrogeology of these ancient potash sources is mostly marine-fed and somewhat different from the continental hydrologies addressed so far.

References

Behrens, P., 2002, Industrial processing of Great Salt lake Brines by Great Salt Lake Minerals and Chemical Corporation, in D. T. Gywnne, ed., Great Salt Lake: A scientific, historical and economic overview, Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Bulletin 116, p. 223-228.

Bingham, C. P., 1980, Solar production of potash from brines of the Bonneville Salt Flats, in J. W. Gwynn, ed., Great Salt Lake; a scientific, history and economic overview. , v. 116, Bulletin Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, p. 229-242.

Butts, D., 2002, Chemistry of Great Salt Lake Brines in Solar Ponds, in D. T. Gywnne, ed., Great Salt Lake: A scientific, historical and economic overview, Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Bulletin 116, p. 170-174.

Butts, D., 2007, Chemicals from Brines, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 784-803.

Chao, L., P. Zicheng, Y. Dong, L. Weiguo, Z. Zhaofeng, H. Jianfeng, and C. Chenlin, 2009, A lacustrine record from Lop Nur, Xinjiang, China: Implications for paleoclimate change during Late Pleistocene: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 38-45.

Dong, Z., P. Lv, G. Qian, X. Xia, Y. Zhao, and G. Mu, 2012, Research progress in China's Lop Nur: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 111, p. 142-153.

Felton, D., J. Waters, R. Moritz, D., and T. A. Lane, 2010, Producing Sulfate of Potash from Polyhalite with Cost Estimates, Gustavson Associates, p. 19.

Hu, G., and N.-a. Wang, 2001, The sand wedge and mirabilite of the last ice age and their paleoclimatic significance in Hexi Corridor: Chinese Geographical Science, v. 11, p. 80-86.

Huntington, E., 1907, Lop-Nor. A Chinese Lake. Part 1. The Unexplored Salt Desert of Lop: Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, v. 39, p. 65-77.

Jones, B., D. Naftz, R. Spencer, and C. Oviatt, 2009, Geochemical Evolution of Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA: Aquatic Geochemistry, v. 15, p. 95-121.

Lin, Y., L. Xu, and G. Mu, 2018, Differential erosion and the formation of layered yardangs in the Loulan region (Lop Nur), eastern Tarim Basin: Aeolian Research, v. 30, p. 41-47.

Liu, C., W. Mili, J. Pengcheng, L. I. Shude, and C. Yongzhi, 2006, Features and Formation Mechanism of Faults and Potash-forming Effect in the Lop Nur Salt Lake, Xinjiang, China: Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, v. 80, p. 936-943.

Liu, C.-A., H. Gong, Y. Shao, Z. Yang, L. Liu, and Y. Geng, 2016a, Recognition of salt crust types by means of PolSAR to reflect the fluctuation processes of an ancient lake in Lop Nur: Remote Sensing of Environment, v. 175, p. 148-157.

Liu, C. L., M. L. Wang, P. C. Jiao, W. D. Fan, Y. Z. Chen, Z. C. Yang, and J. G. Wang, 2008, Sedimentary characteristics and origin of polyhalite in Lop Nur Salt Lake,Xinjiang: Mineral Deposits.

Liu, C. L., J. F. Zhang, P. C. Jiao, and S. Mischke, 2016b, The Holocene history of Lop Nur and its palaeoclimate implications: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 148, p. 163-175.

Ma, C., F. Wang, Q. Cao, X. Xia, S. Li, and X. Li, 2008, Climate and environment reconstruction during the Medieval Warm Period in Lop Nur of Xinjiang, China: Chinese Science Bulletin, v. 53, p. 3016-3027.

Ma, L., T. K. Lowenstein, B. Li, P. Jiang, C. Liu, J. Zhong, J. Sheng, H. Qiu, and H. Wu, 2010, Hydrochemical characteristics and brine evolution paths of Lop Nor Basin, Xinjiang Province, Western China: Applied Geochemistry, v. 25, p. 1770-1782.

Spencer, R. J., H. P. Eugster, and B. F. Jones, 1985b, Geochemistry of Great Salt Lake, Utah II: Pleistocene-Holocene evolution: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 49, p. 739-747.

Spencer, R. J., H. P. Eugster, B. F. Jones, and S. L. Rettig, 1985a, Geochemistry of Great Salt Lake, Utah I: Hydrochemistry since 1850: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 49, p. 727-737.

Sun, M.-g., and L.-c. Ma, 2018, Potassium-rich brine deposit in Lop Nor basin, Xinjiang, China: Scientific Reports, v. 8, p. 7676.

Warren, J. K., 2010, Evaporites through time: Tectonic, climatic and eustatic controls in marine and nonmarine deposits: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 98, p. 217-268.

Warren, J. K., 2016, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3): Berlin, Springer, 1854 p.

 

Stable isotopes in evaporite systems: Part II - 13C (Carbon)

John Warren - Thursday, May 31, 2018

 

Introduction

13C interpretation in most ancient basins focuses on carbonate sediment first deposited/precipitated in the marine realm. Accordingly we shall first look here at the significance of variations in 13C over time in marine carbonates and then move our focus into the hypersaline portions of modern and ancient salty geosystems. In doing so we shall utilize broad assumptions of homogeneity as to the initial distribution of 13C (and 18O) in the marine realm, but these are perhaps oversimplifications and associated limitations need to be recognized (Swart, 2015)

In the next article we shall look at the utility of crossplots of carbon and oxygen isotopes. Stable oxygen isotope values (d18O) crossplotted with respect to carbon isotope values (d13C) from, the same sample creates one of the most widely applied proxies used to infer palaeo-environmental conditions (depositional and diagenetic) in Holocene and ancient carbonate sediments. This is in large part due to kinetic fractionations that occur during evaporation (Leng and Marshall, 2004). It has long been known that as any liquid evaporates, the residual fluid becomes enriched in the less abundant heavy isotope(s) (see Horton et al., 2016 for detailed discussion).

Interpreting 13C

Over the Phanerozoic the standard paradigm for interpreting variations in variations in 13C values from modern and ancient marine carbonate is based on an integration of our understanding of the carbon cycle with the following arguments. Most of the carbon in Earth’s near-surface systems is stored in sedimentary rocks with only about 0.1% in living organisms and the atmosphere-hydrosphere (Figure 1). Oxidized carbon occurs primarily as marine carbonates and reduced carbon as organic matter in sediments. In the carbon cycle, CO2 from the oceans and atmosphere is transferred into sediments as carbonate carbon (Ccarb) or organic carbon (Corg), the former of which monitors the composition of the oceans (Figure 1). The cycle is completed by uplift and weathering of sedimentary rocks and by volcanism, both of which return CO2 to the atmosphere.


There are two stable carbon isotopes, carbon 12 (6 protons and 6 neutrons) and carbon 13 (6 protons and 7 neutrons). Photosynthetic organisms incorporate disproportionately more CO2 containing the lighter carbon 12 than the heavier carbon 13 (the lighter molecules move faster and therefore diffuse more easily into cells where photosynthesis takes place). During periods of high biological productivity, more light carbon 12 is locked up in living organisms and in resulting organic matter that is being buried and preserved in contemporary sediments. Consequently, due the metabolic (mostly photosynthetic) activities of a wide variety of plants, bacteria and archaea, the atmosphere and oceans and their sediments become depleted in carbon 12 and enriched in carbon 13 (Figure 2)


It is assumed that the carbon isotopic ratio in calcareous shells of marine organisms is in equilibrium with that of seawater. So as more carbon 12 is held in biomass during times of high primary productivity, and increased burial of organic carbon, calcareous (CaCO3) skeletal materials become enriched in carbon 13. In contrast during periods of low biological productivity and decreased burial of organic carbon, for example following mass extinctions, marine calcareous skeletal materials become enriched in carbon 12.

Hence plotting variations in carbon isotopes in marine carbonates and organic matter over time offers a way to trace the growth of the crustal reservoir of reduced carbon (Des Marais, 1997). That is, the relative abundance of carbon isotopes is controlled chiefly by: 1) equilibrium isotopic effects among inorganic carbon species, 2) fractionation associated with the biochemistry of organic matter, and 3) the relative rates of burial of carbonate and organic carbon in sediments (Condie 2016).

Because organic matter preferentially incorporates 12C over 13C, there should be an increase in the 13C/12C ratio (as measured by δ13C) in buried carbon with time, and indeed this is what is observed (Des Marais, 1997; Worsley & Nance, 1989). δ13Corg increases from values < -40‰ in the Archaean to modern values of -20 to -30‰. On the other hand, seawater carbon as tracked with δ13Ccarb remains roughly constant with time, with δ13Ccarb averaging about 0%.

Variation in fluxes over time within the carbon cycle can be monitored by an isotopic mass balance (Des Marais, 1997), whereby;

δin = fcarbδ13Ccarb + forgδ13Corg

δin represents the isotopic composition of carbon entering the global surface environment comprised of the atmosphere, hydrosphere, and biosphere. The right side of the equation represents the weighted-average isotopic composition of carbonate (δ13Ccarb) and organic (δ13Corg) carbon buried in sediments, and fcarb and forg are the fractions of carbon buried in each form (fcarb = 1 - forg). For timescales longer than 100 Myr, δin = -5‰, the average value for crustal and mantle carbon (Holser et al., 1988). Thus, where values of sedimentary δ13Ccarb and δ13Corg can be measured, it may be possible to determine forg for ancient carbon cycles. Higher values of δ13Ccarb indicate either a higher value of forg or a greater negativity of average δ13Corg.


During the Phanerozoic, there are several peaks in δ13Ccarb, the largest at about 110, 280, 300, 400, and 530 Ma (Figure 3). These peaks are widely interpreted to reflect an increase in burial rate of organic carbon (Des Marais et al., 1992; Frakes et al., 1992). This is because organic matter selectively enriched in 12C depletes seawater in this isotope, raising the δ13C values of seawater. In the late Paleozoic (300-250 Ma), the maxima in δ13Ccarb correspond to the rise and spread of vascular land plants, which provided a new source of organic debris for burial (Condie 2106, Berner, 1987, 20 01). Also conducive to preservation of organic remains at this time were the vast lowlands on Pangea, which appear to have been sites of widespread swamps where bacterial decay of organic matter is minimized. The drop in δ13Ccarb at the end of the Permian is not understood. Perhaps, large amounts of photosynthetic O2 generated by Carboniferous forests led to extensive forest fires that destroyed large numbers of land plants in the Late Permian (Condie, 2016). However, the reasons for the oscillations in δ13Ccarb are not yet unequivocally resolved and, as in all sciences, the tenet "...perceived correlation does not necessarily equate to causation"must always be at the forefront in the scientific mindset.


Across the Precambrian and the Phanerozoic, the initiation of glaciation on a global scale, as in the Cryogenian ‘Snowball Earth’, has been interpreted to be dependent on parameters like the latitudinal extent of continents and oceanic circulations (Figure 4; Condie, 2016). The main drive for an onset of global glaciation is believed to be the lowering of atmospheric CO2. It likely also requires a continental landmass to be covering one of the earth's polar positions. More recently, cooling related to an increase in the earth's albedo due to widespread evaporites (saline giants) has been added to the list of possible drivers to the onset of glaciation.

Climate modelling studies imply that CO2 concentrations as low as 100–150 ppm are required to initiate global glaciation (e.g. Liu et al., 2013; Feulner and Kienert, 2014). One potential cause of lowered CO2 is drawdown of CO2 during intense silicate weathering in equatorial regions (Hoffman and Schrag, 2002; Goddéris et al., 2003). Photosynthesis provides another mechanism for CO2 drawdown, via conversion of CO2 to O2 and rapid burial of organic carbon, which is reflected in a positive δ13C excursion for carbonates (Pierrehumbert et al., 2011). Additionally, long term cloud cover (Feulner et al., 2015), fluctuations in atmospheric-ocean heat transport, the earth's albedo, or solar luminosity (Pierrehumbert et al. (2011) are also proposed as potential causes of the onset of glaciation (ice-house mode climate).

In a recent paper, Schmid 2017 focused on the cause of the Bitter Springs carbon isotope anomaly, she argues the cause of the pre-glacial, globally recognised, carbon and oxygen isotope variations in carbonate sediments tied to the Bitter Springs anomaly is a response to widespread fractional evaporation of dissolved CO2. This carbon isotope anomaly ties to a well defined correlation with the distribution of Neoproterozoic evaporite basins. She also shows volcanism occurred during the onset of the Bitter Springs Stage (811–788 Ma) and associated widespread evaporite distribution across Australia.


Schmid (op. cit.) argues that the albedo effect began with of the widespread deposition of Rodinian supercontinent evaporites in very shallow marine to epicontinental sedimentary successions beginning ≈810 Ma, increased siliciclastic redbed weathering. This and continuing evaporite deposition and exposure between ≈780 and 720 Ma drove a worldscale increase in Earth's albedo. Such highly reflective salt deposits defined a saline giant across an area that today covers one-third of the Australia continent. Thus, this and other penecontemporaneous saline giants over the Rodinian supercontinent played a potentially significant role in the onset of atmospheric cooling via a significant increase in albedo (Figure 5). These salt beds occur in periods that typify the onset of local (750 Ma) and then global glaciation (720 Ma).


Schmid (2017) goes on to note that the degree of evaporation in the Bitter Springs group sediments is related to the δ13C signature in variably concentrated waters (Figure 6). That is the Tonian Bitter Springs Group (≈830–750 Ma), within the Amadeus Basin in central Australia consists of thick halite and sulphate evaporite accumulations and associated carbonates. The deposition of halite occurred in shallow marine, lagoon (salina) environment (Gillen Formation), and developed into sulphate-dominated supratidal sabkha during sea level regression (Johnnys Creek Formation). The overall regression was interrupted by a transgressive phase lasting at least 20 Ma and leading to deposition of basin-wide stromatolitic dolostone (Loves Creek Formation). The salinity and high evaporation is reflected in positive δ13C in the intercalated carbonates (+4 to +6‰ VPDB) of the evaporitic units, while the shallow marine stromatolitic incursion of the Loves Creek Formation (−2‰ δ13C) show typical marine carbonate isotopic values (Figure 7).

This salinity controlled isotopic separation supports the observations of Stiller et al. (1985) who noted extreme enrichment of 13C in the dissolved inorganic carbon pool in evaporating brines up with δ13C values of up to + 16.5‰ under natural abiotic, oxic conditions in Dead Sea evaporation ponds (Figure 7). The systematic increase in 13C values in highly evaporated waters from the various bittern ponds of the Dead Sea Saltworks is thought to result from a nonequilibrium gas-transfer isotope fractionation. The process of ongoing evaporation leads to CO2 loss within the evaporative brine as less and less gas can held in solution (see Warren 2016, Chapter 9). CO2 exchange in a concentrating surface brine occurs directly between the water column and air, resulting in direct CO2 loss through evaporation. In a sabkha environment. CO2 is released from the hypersaline groundwater through sediments before being released to air as evaporites may form intrasediment precipitates. Overall, atmospheric CO2 uptake in hypersaline settings fed by shallow marine water is diminished compared to the normal marine settings.


Precipitated carbonates modern salinas and sabkhas are mainly aragonite, and formed in association with such evaporative brine, are consistently13C enriched, as seen in nearby Solar Lake and Sabkha Gavish (Figure 2; Stiller et al., 1985; Schidlowski et al., 1984). In a similar fashion, Palaeoproterozoic interbedded shallow marine carbonates, redbeds and evaporites have values up to δ13C + 17.2‰ (Melezhik et al., 1999). Permian and Triassic (Schmid et al., 2006a) redbeds and evaporite sequences also have 13C-rich carbonates (up to +7‰) and enrichment is partly attributed to evaporation and associated CO2 loss (Beauchamp et al., 1987). In modern oceans, atmospheric CO2 is consumed by biological activity and carbonate production originates from mainly marine organisms, leading to near atmospheric to organic negative δ13C signatures in the precipitated sediment(Andersson, 2013).

If increasing salinity leads to unfavourable conditions for photosynthesising organisms to survive (Lazar and Erez, 1992), carbonate through to bittern precipitation becomes increasingly abiotic and evaporation driven, especially at the upper end of the evaporation series. The loss of Ca during evaporation of a brine, via aragonite and calcium sulphate precipitation, leads to an increase in Mg/Ca ratio and an increase in residual brine density. This can result in primary dolomite precipitation or widespread reflux dolomitisation (Schmid et al., 2006, Warren 2000, 2016.

In summary, the typical δ13C signature in normal marine carbonate sediment across much of geological time centres around 0 ‰ and ranges between a few parts per mille on either side of the zero line reflecting precipitation by calcifying and photosynthesising organisms (e.g. algae), while abiotic, evaporation induced carbonates tend to have δ13C values above +1‰. More positive δ13C values (+4 to +6‰) tend to typify dominantly abiotic carbonates (and local methanogenic carbonates with even more positive values) and support the notion of evaporation-driven 13C-enrichement in times of widespread evaporitic epeiric and basinwide carbonates. In the Precambrian, widespread marine stromatolitic units such as, algal Loves Creek Formation reflects δ13C values for biogenic carbonate precipitation under shallow marine, non-hypersaline conditions. The change from a shallow hypersaline lagoon towards evaporitic mudflats and salterns suggests an increase in aridity and continentality/hydrographic isolation, with associated more positive δ13C values.

Implications for some types of 13C anomaly

The Bitter Springs Group chemostratigraphy has been correlated globally and the negative excursion was named previously after this unit (Bitter Springs Stage anomaly). However, the mechanism of evaporation-driven fractionation of δ13C is different from the commonly proposed inorganic-organic carbon fractionation, and challenges the views on interpreting global chemostratigraphic anomalies or excursion and their cause. Evaporite basins covered vast regions worldwide prior to the Sturtian glaciation, e.g. the Australian evaporites would have covered a third of the continent. The light surface of evaporites and associated carbonates would have had a high albedo and effectively cause less surface heat absorption. This subsequently would have triggered temperature decrease on a continental and possibly global scale. The Schmid paper hypothesises that the deposition of evaporites worldwide would have contributed to global cooling starting ≈100 Ma prior to Snowball Earth and would have played an important role in the onset of global glaciation.

References

Andersson, A.J., 2013. The oceanic CaCO3 cycle. In: T. Holland (Editor), Treatise on Geochemistry, 2nd ed. Elsevier, pp. 519-542.

Beauchamp, B., Oldershaw, A.E. and Krouse, H.R., 1987. Upper Carboniferous to Upper Permian 13C-enriched primary carbonates in the Sverdrup Basin, Canadian Arctic: comparisons to coeval western North American ocean margins. Chem. Geol. , 65: 391-413.

Berner, R.A., 1987. Models for carbon and sulfur cycles and atmospheric oxygen; application to Paleozoic geologic history. American Journal of Science, 287: 177-196.

Berner, R.A., 2001. Modeling atmospheric O2 over Phanerozoic time. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 65: 685-694.

Condie, K.C., 2016. Earth as an Evolving Planetary System (3rd edition). Elsevier, 350 pp.

Des Marais, D.J., 1997. Isotopic evolution of the biogeochemical carbon cycle during the Proterozoic Eon. Organic Geochemistry, 27(5): 185-193.

Des Marais, D.J., Strauss, H., Summons, R.E. and Hayes, J.M., 1992. Carbon isotope evidence for the stepwise oxidation of the Proterozoic environment. Nature, 359: 605-609.

Feulner, G., Hallmann, C. and Kienert, H., 2015. Snowball cooling after algal rise. Nat. Geosci. , 8: 659-662.

Feulner, G. and Kienert, H., 2014. Climate simulations of Neoproterozoic snowball Earth events: similar critical carbon dioxide levels for the Sturtian and Marinoan glaciations. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 404: 200-205.

Frakes, L.A., Francis, J.E. and Syktus, J.L., 1992. Climate modes of the Phanerozoic. Cambridge University Press, New York, 274 pp.

Goddéris, Y., Donnadieu, Y., Nédélec, A., Dupré, B., Dessert, C., Grard, A., Ramstein, G. and François, L.M., 2003. The Sturtian ‘snowball’ glaciation: fire and ice. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. , 211: 1-12.

Hoffman, P.F. and Schrag, D.P., 2002. The snowball Earth hypothesis: testing the limits of global change. Terra Nova, 14: 129-155.

Holser, W.T., Schidlowski, M., Mackenzie, F.T. and Maynard, J.B., 1988. Geochemical cycles of carbon and sulfur. In: C.B. Gregor, R.M. Garrels, F.T. Mackenzie and J.B. Maynard (Editors), Chemical cycles in the evolution of the earth. John Wiley, New York, pp. 105–173.

Horton, T.W., Defliese, W.F., Tripati, A.K. and Oze, C., 2016. Evaporation induced 18O and 13C enrichment in lake systems: A global perspective on hydrologic balance effects. Quaternary Science Reviews, 131: 365-379.

Lazar, B. and Erez, J., 1992. Carbon geochemistry of marine-derived brines: I. 13C depletions due to intense photosynthesis. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 56: 335-345.

Leng, M.J. and Marshall, J.D., 2004. Paleoclimate interpretation of stable isotope data from lake sediment archives. Quaternary Science Reviews, 23(811-831).

Liu, Y., Peltier, W.R., Yang, J. and Vettoretti, G., 2013. The initiation of Neoproterozoic ‘‘snowball” climates in CCSM3: the influence of paleocontinental configuration. Climate Past, 9: 2555-2577.

Melezhik, V.A., Fallick, A.E., Medvedev, P.V. and Makarikhin, V.V., 1999. Extreme 13Ccarb enrichment in ca. 2.0 Ga magnesite-stromatolite-dolomite-‘red beds’ association in a global context: a case for the world-wide signal enhanced by a local environment. Earth Sci. Rev., 48: 71-120.

Pierrehumbert, R.T., Abott, D.S., Voigt, A. and Koll, D., 2011. Climate of the neoproterozoic. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 39: 417-460.

Schidlowski, M., Matzigkeit, U. and Krumbein, W.E., 1984. Superheavy organic carbon from hypersaline microbial mats; Assimilatory Pathway and Geochemical Implications. Naturwissenschaften, 71(6): 303-308.

Schmid, S., 2017. Neoproterozoic evaporites and their role in carbon isotope chemostratigraphy (Amadeus Basin, Australia). Precambrian Research, 290: 16-31.

Schmid, S., Worden, R.H. and Fisher, Q., 2006. Carbon isotope stratigraphy using carbonate cements in the Triassic Sherwood Sandstone Group: Corrib Field, west of Ireland. Chem. Geol., 225: 137-155.

Stiller, M., Rounick, J.S. and Shasha, S., 1985. Extreme carbon-isotope enrichments in evaporating brines. Nature, 316: 434.

Swart, P.K., 2015. The geochemistry of carbonate diagenesis: The past, present and future. Sedimentology, 62(5): 1233-1304.

Warren, J.K., 2000. Dolomite: Occurrence, evolution and economically important associations. Earth Science Reviews, 52(1-3): 1-81.

Warren, J.K., 2016. Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3). Springer, Berlin, 1854 pp.

Worsley, T.R. and Nance, R.D., 1989. Carbon redox and climate control through Earth history: A speculative reconstruction. Paleogeography, Paleoclimatology, Paleoecology, 75: 259-282.

 

Stable isotopes in evaporite systems: Part I: Sulphur

John Warren - Monday, April 30, 2018

 

Introduction

The sulphur isotopic composition of sulphate dissolved in modern seawater (SW), and the relationship with the associated modern and ancient sulphate precipitates, has been studied for more than five decades. An understanding of the controlling factors is fundamental in any interpretation of the origin of modern and ancient sedimentary calcium sulphates.

So, we shall look at the significance of sulphur isotopes, first by reviwing what is known in terms of the isotopic evolution of marine sulphate salts across the evaporation series from gypsum to the bitterns, and then across a time perspective via the evolution of oceanic sulphate and sulphide signatures from the Archean to the present.


Sulphur isotopes across the bittern series

The accepted d34S value of modern seawater-derived calcium sulphate (gypsum) is + 20.0 ±0.2‰ (Sasaki, 1972; Zak et al., 1980 and references therein). This is a average value, based on numerous analyses across the range ( +19.3 to +21.4‰). Notably, Rees et al. (1978) obtained a mean of +20.99 ± 0.09‰, using the SF6 method, which has a better reproducibility than the conventional S02 method. Mediterranean seawater gave a d34S value of +20.5‰ (Nielsen, 1978).

Measured values in natural gypsum from seawater show initial precipitates have a d34S value slightly higher than that of its source brine (Figure 1). The highest isotope differential for gypsum naturally precipitated from seawater, as recorded in the literature, is +4.2‰ (Laguna Madre, Texas, U.S.A.; Thode, 1964). Most reported d34Sgypsum-sw differentials lie in range from 0 to + 2.4‰ (Ault and Kulp, 1959; Thode et al., 1961; Thode and Monster, 1965; Holser and Kaplan, 1966).

Prior to Raab and Spirto (Figure 1; 1991), laboratory experiment data on d34Sgypsum-solution are scarce, especially for solutions mimicking initial precipitation of gypsum from natural seawater and passing into halite saturation. Harrison (1956) measured a d34Sgypsum-solution value of ~ + 2‰ for gypsum precipitated from an artificial solution, that was saturated with respect to gypsum. Thode and Monster (1965) calculated a K-value [ (32S/34S)solution/ (32S/34S)gypsum] of 1.00165 from a measured a d34Sgypsum-solution value of + 1.65‰ for a CaSO4.2H2O -saturated solution, evaporated under reduced pressure and allowed to age and equilibrate for 24 months at room temperature. An experiment using natural seawater was carried out by Holser and Kaplan (1966), who sampled the products of evaporating seawater in a tank with continuous refilling (green circles in Figure 1). The results show “only a small difference between brine and gypsum precipitated” (Holser and Kaplan, 1966, p.97), resulting in a mean value of d34Sgypsum-seawater = +1.7‰ (+19.4 to +21.1‰). Harrison (1956) calculated from experimental vibrational frequencies for S04 in solution and in crystalline CaSO4.2H2O, a constant K = 1.001 for the reaction:

(Ca34S04.2H2O + 32SO4)SOLID = (Ca32S04.2H2O + 34SO4)SOLUTION

which means a 1‰ increase of d34S in the solid fraction. Nielsen (1978, p. 16-B-20), using Rayleigh-type fractionation curves indicates that, “...the gypsum/anhydrite of the sulphate facies should be slightly enriched in 34S with respect to the unaffected seawater sulphate”

In the geological record the evaporites of the later Mg- and K-Mg- sulphate bittern facies are depleted in 34S relative to the earlier, basal Ca-sulphates, as rseen in the geological record. Nielsen and Ricke (1964, p.582) give a mean value of +2‰ for the depletion in 34S in later bittern evaporite sulphates relative to the basal Ca-sulphates in the Upper Permian Zechstein Series (Hattorf and Reyershausen, Germany) whereas Holser and Kaplan (1966, pp. 116 and 117) give a value of -1.0±0.8‰ (their d34Spotash-magnesia facies sulphates - d34Sgypsum/anhydrite facies) for the Zechstein Basin (Germany) and -0.8±0.5‰ for the Upper Permian Delaware Basin (U.S.A.) evaporites (green circles in Figure 1).

Theoretical calculations of the behaviour of the sulphur isotopic fractionation during the late evaporation stages were made by Holser and Kaplan (1966, pp. 116 and 117, fig. 4) and by Nielsen (1978, p. 16-B-20, fig. 16-B-12) applying the Rayleigh distillation equation and using the same fractionation factor calculated from the initial gypsum (1.00165). Their curves are thus in a continuous line with those calculated for the Ca-sulphates. These show an increasing degree of depletion in 34S in the sulphates precipitated in the course of the progressive evaporation in a closed basin, relative to the first Ca-sulphate precipitated, up to the end of the carnallite facies. They explain it by the continuous depletion in 34S in the brines. Thus their calculated d34Scrystal-initial gypsum at the end of the halite facies is ~ -0.6‰, at the end of the Mg-sulphate facies -1.0‰, and at the beginning of the carnallite facies -3.8‰, and relative to the original seawater (their 34SC) the differences are +1.0, +0.4 and -2.2‰, respectively. Nielsen (1978) also plotted an extrapolated fractionation curve for the residual brines in a closed reservoir, indicating that the brine is constantly depleted by 1.65‰ relative to the associated precipitate.

Prior to the laboratory work of Raab and Spiro (1991), no experimental data pertaining to the isotopic behaviour of sulphate sulphur in the late evaporative stages of seawater was available in the literature. Raab and Spiro evaporated seawater, stepwise and isothermally at 23.5°C, for 73 days, up to a degree of evaporation of 138x by H2O weight. At various stages of evaporation the precipitate was totally removed from the brine and the brine was allowed to evaporate further. The sulfur isotopic compositions of the precipitates and related brines showed the following characteristics (Figure 1) where the initial d34S of the original seawater is +20‰. The d34S of both precipitates and associated brines decrease gradually across the gypsum field nd aup to the end of the halite field, where d34Sprecipitate = + 19.09‰ and d34Sbrine = + 18.40‰. The precipitates are always enriched in 34S relative to the associated brines in these fields, but the enrichment becomes smaller towards the end of the halite field. A crossover, where the d34S value of the brines becomes higher than those of the precipitates, occurs at the beginning of the Mg-sulfate field. The d34Sprecipitate increases from + 19.09‰ at the end of the halite field through +19.35‰ in the Mg-sulfate field to + 19.85‰ in the K-Mg-sulfate field, whereas the d34Sbrine increased from +18.40‰, through +20.91‰ to +20.94‰, respectively.

This evolution implies different values of fractionation factors (a) for the minerals precipitated in the late halite, Mg-sulphate and K-Mg-sulphate fields, other than that for gypsum (1.00165). The value of aprecipitate-residual brine would then be very slightly >1 in the late halite field and >1 in the two later fields.

The experimental pattern of evolution of the d34S-values of the precipitates from their experiment is in good agreement with data for natural anhydrites interbedded in halites, where d34S-values are lower relative to basal gypsum (and secondary anhydrite), and of primary minerals of the Mg- and K-Mg-sulfate facies, reported in evaporitic sequences, such as those of the Delaware (U.S.A.) and of the Zechstein (Germany) basins and so can be used to better interpret a marine origin of the sulphate bitterns.


Ancient oceanic sulphate

The element sulphur is an important constituent of the Earth’s exogenic cycle. During the sulphur cycle, 34S is fractionated from 32S, with the largest fractionation occurring during bacterial reduction of marine sulphate to sulphide. Isotopic fractionation is expressed as d34S, in a manner similar to that used for carbon isotopes and the longterm carbon curves related to the sulphur isotope curve across deep time (see next article). Sedimentary sulphates (mostly measured on anhydrite, but also baryte) typically are used to record the isotopic composition of sulphur in seawater (Figure 2). Mantle d34S is near 0‰, and bacterial reduction of sulphate to sulphides (mostly as pyrite) strongly prefers 32S, thus reducing d34S in organic sulphides to negative values (≈ -18‰), so leaving oxidized sulphur species with approximately equivalent positive values (+17‰; Figure 3).


Historically, the sulphur cycle has been interpreted as being largely controlled by the biosphere and in particular by sulphate-reducing bacteria that inhabit shallow marine waters (Strauss, 1997). Typically, sulphur occurs in its oxidized form as dissolved sulphate in seawater or as evaporitic sulphate and in its reduced form as sedimentary pyrite. The isotopic compositions of both redox states are sensitive indicators for changes of the geological, marine geochemical or biological environments in the past (Figure 2). The isotope record of marine sedimentary sulphate through time has been used successfully to determine global variations of the composition of seawater sulphate.

The isotopic composition of sedimentary (biogenic) pyrite reflects geochemical conditions during its formation via bacterial sulphate reduction. Sedimentary pyrite is, thus, an important record of evolutionary (microbial) processes of life on Earth. Both time records (anhydrite and pyrite) have been combined in an isotope mass balance calculation, and changes in burial rates of oxidized vs. reduced sulphur can be determined (Strauss, 1997). This, in turn, yields important information for the overall exogenic cycle (i.e. the earth's oxygen budget as discussed in the next article).

And so, values preserved in ancient marine sulphate evaporites are part of the broader world sulphur cycle across deep time that includes movements in and out of marine sulphides (dominantly pyrite) and marine baryte precipitates (Figure 2). Values based on evaporitic CaSO4 are consistent with the ranges seen in modern gypsum (Figure 3). A plot of ancient marine CaSO4 evaporites shows the oxxidised sulphur curve for seawater has varied across time from +30‰ in the Cambrian, to around +10‰ in the Permian and that it increased irregularly in the Mesozoic to its present value of +20‰ (Figure 4). Oxygen values show much less variability and will be discussed in more detail in the next article in this series. Time-consistent variations are reflected in all major marine sulphate evaporite deposits and were most likely controlled by major input or removal of sulphides from the oceanic reservoirs during changes driven by longterm variations in tectonic activity and weathering rates.

Historically, simple removal of oceanic sulphate via an increase in the volume of megasulphate deposition in a saline giant was not thought to be accompanied by dramatic isotopic effects. Rather, variations within the global sulphur cycle were thought to be controlled by a redox balance with stored sulphides and organics in more reducing environments, which are also linked to the carbon cycle and the atmospheric oxygen budget.

In this scenario the oxidative part of the global sulphur cycle is largely governed by continental weathering (especially of marine black shale), riverine transport and evaporite deposition, while the reduced part of the sulphur cycle is controlled by levels of fixation of reduced sulphur-bearing compounds in the sediment column, mostly as pyrite via bacterial sulphate reduction (Figure 2.). The latter process preferentially removes isotopically light sulphur from seawater and so increases the d34S value in the ocean, and any consequent precipitate.

However, more recent work question aspects of this older sulphur cycle/pyrite/organics model. As just discussed, variations in d34Ssulphate across the Phanerozoic are traditionally interpreted to reflect changes in the total amount of sulphur buried as pyrite in ocean sediments — a parameter referred to as fpyr and defined as (Hurtgen, 2012);

fpyr = [(pyrite Sburial)/(pyrite Sburial + evaporite S burial)].

However, Wortmann and Paytan (2012) conclude that the 5‰ negative d34Ssulphate shift in ~120-million- year-old rocks was caused by massive seawater sulphate removal, which accompanied large-scale evaporite deposition during the opening of the South Atlantic Ocean (Figure 4). In their model, the negative d34Ssulphate shift is driven by lower pyrite burial rates that result from substantially reduced marine sulphate levels in the world ocean, tied to megasulphate precipitation. The authors attribute a 5‰ positive d34Ssulphate shift in the world’s oceans about 50 million years ago to an abrupt increase in marine sulphate concentrations as a result of large-scale dissolution of freshly exposed evaporites; they argue that the higher sulphate concentrations in the ocean in turn led to more pyrite burial.


Likewise, Halevy et al. (2012 ) studied past sulphur fluxes to and from the ocean, but over a longer time-frame (the Phanerozoic). They quantified sulphate evaporite burial rates through time, then scaled these rates to obtain a global estimate of variation in sulphur flux. Their results indicate that sulphate burial rates were higher than previously estimated, but also greatly variable. When Halevy et al. (2012) integrated these improved evaporite burial fluxes with seawater sulphate concentration estimates and sulphur isotope constraints, their calculations implied that Phanerozoic fpyr values (fpyr = fraction of sulphur removed from the oceans as pyrite) were ~100% higher on average than previously recognized. These surprisingly high and constant pyrite burial outputs must have been balanced by equally high and constant inputs of sulphate to the ocean via sulphide oxidation (weathering). These relatively high and constant rates of pyrite weathering and burial over the Phanerozoic, as identified by Halevy et al. (2012, suggest that the consumption and production of oxygen via these processes played a larger role in regulating Phanerozoic atmospheric oxygen levels than previously recognized, perhaps by as much as 50%.

Both studies recognize the importance of episodic evaporite burial on the sulphur cycle, while Wortmann and Paytan (2012) clearly show that large-scale deposition and dissolution of sulphate evaporites over relatively short geologic time scales can have an enormous impact on marine sulphate concentrations, pyrite burial rates, and the carbon cycle and so probably play a more important role than previously recognised in regulating the chemistry of the ocean atmosphere system.

The 18O content in seawater sulphate fluctuates less than sulphur values over geologic time (see next article for detailed discussion). The isotopic composition of sulphate minerals varied only slightly from the Neoproterozoic to the Palaeozoic decreasing from +17 to +14‰ (Figure 4). Values then rose during the Devonian to reach +17‰ during the Early Carboniferous (Mississippian). Values then fell to =+10‰ during the Permian, mimicked by a similar decline in sulphur values in the Late Permian to Early Triassic. Since the rise to +15‰ in the Early Triassic, values of marine sulphate minerals have remained close to +14‰ (add 3.5‰ to mineral determined value to give ambient seawater value). Overall, oxygen values show little correlation with marine sulphate variation and are perhaps are more controlled by sulphide weathering reactions.

What is also significant is that, given the now well established sulphur isotope age curve, a comparison of a measured d34S value from an anhydrite or gypsum of known geological age to the curve allows an interpretation of a possible marine origin to the salt. A value which differs from the marine signature does not necessarily mean a nonmarine origin, but, at the least, it does mean diagenetic reworking or, more likely, a groundwater-induced recycling of sulphate ions into a nonmarine saline lake (Pierre, 1988). Such oxygen and sulphur isotopic crossplots have been used to establish the continental (nonmarine) origin of the Eocene gypsum of the Paris Basin and the upper Miocene gypsum of the Granada basin, with sulphate derived from weathering of uplifted Mesozoic marine evaporites (Fontes and Letolle, 1976; Rouchy and Pierre, 1979; Pierre, 1982).

Sulphur is largely resistant to isotopic fractionation during burial alteration and transformation of gypsum to anhydrite (Figure 5; Worden et al., 1997). For example, primary marine stratigraphic sulphur isotope variation is preserved in anhydrites of the Permian Khuff Formation, despite subsequent dehydration to anhydrite during burial (≈1,000m) and initial precipitation as gypsum from Permian and Triassic seawater. Gypsum dehydration to anhydrite did not involve significant isotopic fractionation or diagenetic redistribution of material in the subsurface. At depths greater than 4300 m, the same sulphur isotope variation across the Permian-Triassic boundary is still present in elemental sulphur and H2S, both products of the reaction of anhydrite with hydrocarbons via thermochemical sulphate reduction (Figure 5). Clearly, thermochemical sulphate reduction did not lead to sulphur isotope fractionation. Worden et al. also argues that significant mass transfer has not occurred in the system, at least in the vicinity of the Permian-Triassic boundary, even though elemental sulphur and H2S are both fluid phases at depths greater than 4300 m. Primary differences in sulphur isotopes have been preserved in the rocks and fluids, despite two major diagenetic overprints that converted the sulphur in the original gypsum into elemental sulphur and H2S by 4300 m burial and the potentially mobile nature of some of the reaction products. That is, all reactions occurred must have occurred in situ; there was no significant sulphur isotope fractionation, and only negligible sulphur was added, subtracted, or moved internally within the system.


The resistance to fractionation of sulphur isotopes in subsurface pore waters can also be utilised to determine the origin of saline thermal pore waters. In a study of sulphur isotopic compositions of waters in saline thermal springs, Risacher et al. (2011) came to the interesting conclusion that dissolution of continental sedimentary gypsum from the Tertiary-age Salt Cordillera was the dominant supplier of sulphate (Figure 6). The sulphate in the springs was not supplied by the reworking of volcanic sulphur in this active volcanic terrain. d34S values from 3 to 11‰ in continental gypsum and this also encompasses the range of d34S in pedogenic gypsum (5 to 8‰) and in most surface waters (3.4 to 7.4‰) including salt lakes (Rech et al., 2003). Frutos and Cisternas (2003) found isotope ratios ranging from 1.5 to 10.8‰ in five native sulphur samples. Figure 6 presents the sulphur isotope ratio of dissolved sulphate in thermal waters sampled by Risacher et al. (2011) and references therein. The d34S of sulphate in northern thermal springs is within the range of salt lakes waters and continental gypsum. In an earlier paper Risacher et al. (2003) showed that salar brines leak through bottom sediments and are recycled in the hydrologic system. Deep circulating thermal waters are dissolving continental gypsum in sedimentary layers below the volcanics associated with the present day salars. The exception to this observation is the sulphur in Tatio springs where Cortecci et al. (2005) proposed a deep-seated source for the sulphate, related to magma degassing (Figure 6).


References

Cortecci, G., Boschetti, T., Mussi, M., Herrera Lameli, C., Mucchino, C. and Barbieri, M., 2005. New chemical and original isotopic data on waters from El Tatio geothermal field, northern Chile. Geochemical Journal 39: 547-571.

Fontes, J.C. and Letolle, R., 1976. 18O and 34S in the upper Bartonian gypsum deposits of the Paris Basin. Chemical Geology, 18(4): 285-295.

Frutos, J. and Cisternas, M., 2003. Isotopic Differentiation in Volcanic-Epithermal Surface Sulfur Deposits of Northern Chile: d34S < 0‰ in “Fertile” Systems (Au-Ag-Cu Ore Deposits below), versus d34S ≥ 0‰ for “Barren” Systems. Short Papers - IV South American Symposium on Isotope Geology (Salvador, Brazil, 2003): 733-735.

Halevy, I., Peters, S.E. and Fischer, W.W., 2012. Sulfate Burial Constraints on the Phanerozoic Sulfur Cycle. Science, 337(6092): 331-334.

Holser, W.T. and Kaplan, I.R., 1966. Isotope geochemistry of sedimentary sulfates. Chemical Geology: 93-135.

Hurtgen, M.T., 2012. The Marine Sulfur Cycle, Revisited. Science, 337(6092): 305-306.

Nielsen, H., 1978. Sulfur isotopes in nature. In: K.H. Wedepohl (Editor), Handbook of Geochemistry Section 16B, pp. B1 - B40.

Nielsen, H. and Ricke, W., 1964. Schwefel-lsotopenverhältnissen von Evaporiten aus Deutschland; Ein Beitrag zur Kenntnis von d34S im Meerwasscr-Sulfat. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Act, 28: 577-591.

Pierre, C., 1982. Teneurs en isotopes stables (18O, 2H, 13C, 34S) et conditions de genese des evaporites marines; application a quelques milieux actuels et au Messinien de la Mediterranee. Doctoral Thesis, Orsay, Paris-Sud.

Raab, M. and Spiro, B., 1991. Sulfur isotopic variations during seawater evaporation with fractional crystallization. Chemical Geology: Isotope Geoscience section, 86(4): 323-333.

Rech, J.A., Quade, J. and Hart, W.S., 2003. Isotopic evidence for the source of Ca and S in soil gypsum, anhydrite and calcite in the Atacama Desert, Chile. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 67(4): 575-586.

Rees, C.E., Jenkins, W.J. and Monster, J., 1978. The sulfur isotopic composition of ocean water sulphate. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, 43: 377-381.

Risacher, F., Fritz, B. and Hauser, A., 2011. Origin of components in Chilean thermal waters. Journal of South American Earth Sciences, 31(1): 153-170.

Rouchy, J.M. and Pierre, C., 1979. Donnees sedimentologiques et isotopiques sur les gypses des series evaporitiques messiniennes d'Espagne meridionale et de Chypre. Rev. Geogr. Phys. Geol. Dyn., 21(4): 267-280.

Sasaki, A., 1971. Variation in sulfur isotope composition of oceanic sulfate. 14th Int. Geol. Congr. Sect. 1: 342-345.

Strauss, H., 1997. The isotopic composition of sedimentary sulfur through time. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology, 132: 97-118.

Thode, H.D., 1964. Stable isotopes a key to our understanding of natural processes. Bulletin Canadian Petroleum Geologists, 12: 246-261.

Thode, H.G. and Monster, J., 1965. Sulfur-Isotope Geochemistry of Petroleum, Evaporites, and Ancient Seas, Fluids in Subsurface Environments. AAPG Memoir 4, pp. 367-377.

Worden, R.H., Smalley, P.C. and Fallick, A.E., 1997. Sulfur cycle in buried evaporites. Geology, 25(7): 643-646.

Wortmann, U.G. and Paytan, A., 2012. Rapid Variability of Seawater Chemistry Over the Past 130 Million Years. Science, 337(6092): 334-336.

Zak, I., Sakai, H. and Kaplan, R., 1980. Factors controlling the 18O/16O and 34S/32S isotopic ratios of ocean sulfates and interstitial sulfates from modern deep sea sediments. In: E.D. Goldberg, Y. Horibe and K. Saruhaki (Editors), Isotope Marine Chemistry. Geochem. Res. Assoc, Tokyo, pp. 339-373.


 


Recent Posts


Tags

carbon cycle basinwide evaporite halophile McArthur River Pb-Zn Red Sea namakier Lop Nur Stebnik Potash sulfate MgSO4 enriched methane Lamellibrachia luymesi CO2: albedo Ingebright Lake deep meteoric potash Ripon Realmonte potash mummifiction halite-hosted cave Kalush Potash alkaline lake nuclear waste storage dihedral angle Bathymodiolus childressi endosymbiosis lithium brine Boulby Mine Warrawoona Group Mega-monsoon dissolution collapse doline Clayton Valley playa: Pilbara anthropogenic potash potash ore price bischofite salt seal Dead Sea caves Lop Nor MOP kainitite bedded potash stevensite methanotrophic symbionts Belle Plain Member dark salt phreatomagmatic explosion CaCl2 brine sinjarite seal capacity Dead Sea saltworks Lomagundi Event Lake Magadi Deep seafloor hypersaline anoxic lake water on Mars Hell Kettle Atlantis II Deep 13C enrichment Sulphate of potash SedEx freefight lake wireline log interpretation salt periphery saline clay sinkhole astrakanite meta-evaporite Karabogazgol evaporite-metal association DHAL Neoproterozoic Oxygenation Event Deep Hadley cell: marine brine Ure Terrace Hyperarid Mulhouse Basin capillary zone methanogenesis potash H2S gas in salt Weeks Island salt mine phreatic explosion vanished evaporite zeolite hydrohalite Gamma log gas outburst gem cryogenic salt Schoenite snake-skin chert climate control on salt African rift valley lakes Crescent potash potash ore 18O cauliflower chert trona Kara bogaz gol High Magadi beds lithium battery crocodile skin chert sulfur seawater evolution sodium silicate anomalous salt zones Magdalen's Road salt leakage, dihedral angle, halite, halokinesis, salt flow, antarcticite doline Mesoproterozoic RHOB halotolerant Salar de Atacama salt mine mass die-back Neutron Log epsomite 18O enrichment extrasalt Pangaea Paleoproterozoic Oxygenation Event vestimentiferan siboglinids intersalt Koppen climate mirabilite halite York (Whitehall) Mine base metal nitrogen well logs in evaporites knistersalz lithium carbonate geohazard collapse doline Density log gypsum dune jadarite Zaragoza flowing salt chert Koeppen Climate 13C salt trade Danakhil Depression, Afar Patience Lake member Platform evaporite Sumo intrasalt Proterozoic Stebnyk potash sulphate evaporite karst Thiotrphic symbionts vadose zone blowout Belle Isle salt mine ancient climate waste storage in salt cavity well blowout North Pole Messinian venice evaporite Great Salt Lake evaporite-hydrocarbon association Quaternary climate lot's wife lunette black salt water in modern-day Mars magadiite authigenic silica salt karst nacholite perchlorate eolian transport MVT deposit Calyptogena ponderosa salt suture recurring slope lines (RSL) organic matter causes of glaciation hectorite Prairie Evaporite allo-suture Badenian brine evolution hydrothermal potash natural geohazard anthropogenically enhanced salt dissolution hydrological indicator CO2 auto-suture Dead Sea karst collapse SOP halokinetic Seepiophila jonesi DHAB sulphur rockburst circum-Atlantic Salt Basins salt ablation breccia stable isotope Ethiopia source rock subsidence basin Phaneozoic climate sepiolite lazurite silica solubility mine stability solar concentrator pans brine pan evaporite dissolution Jefferson Island salt mine Precambrian evaporites Zabuye Lake solikamsk 2 K2O from Gamma Log salt tectonics sedimentary copper hydrothermal karst Evaporite-source rock association GR log Muriate of potash Dallol saltpan well log interpretation HYC Pb-Zn Neoproterozoic tachyhydrite palygorskite Lake Peigneur NPHI log gassy salt brine lake edge Catalayud oil gusher Musley potash supercontinent Five Island salt dome trend carnallitite silicified anhydrite nodules lapis lazuli hydrogen Corocoro copper carbon oxygen isotope cross plots Turkmenistan MgSO4 depleted NaSO4 salts deep seafloor hypersaline anoxic basin Archean

Archive