Salty Matters

The Blog is written by me, John Warren. Once every three or four weeks or so I will post an article or two on an evaporite topic that has piqued my interest. On the Saltwork Publications webpage (under "the Works") there is a growing library of pdfs and epubs based on these blogs. These articles on the website have much higher resolution extractable graphics in than in the blog. There is also a link to this set of pdfs and epubs on the home page (www.saltworkconsultants.com).

Brine evolution and origins of potash: primary or secondary? SOP in Quaternary saline lakes: Part 2 of 2

John Warren - Friday, November 30, 2018

 


Introduction

This, the second in this series of articles on potash brine evolution deals with production of sulphate of potash in plants that exploit saline hydrologies hosted in Quaternary saline sumps. There are two settings where significant volumes of sulphate of potash salts are economically produced at the current time; the Ogden salt pans on the northeast shore of the Great Salt Lake in Utah and Lop Nur in China. Although potassium sulphate salts precipitate if modern seawater is evaporated to the bittern stage, as yet there is no operational SOP plant utilising seawater. This is due to concurrent elevated levels of magnesium and chlorine in the bittern, a combination that favours the precipitation of carnallite concurrently with the precipitation of double sulphate salts, such as kainite (Figure 1). Until now, this makes the processing of the multi-mineralogic precipitate for a pure SOP product too expensive when utilising a marine brine feed.

 

Potash in Great Salt Lake, USA (SOP evolution with backreactions)

Today sulphate of potash fertiliser is produced via a combination of solar evaporation and brine processing, using current waters of the Great Salt Lake, Utah, as the brine feed into the Ogden salt pans, which are located at the northeastern end of the Great Salt Lake depression in Utah (Figure 2a). A simpler anthropogenic muriate of potash (MOP) brine evolution occurs in the nearby Wendover salt pans on the Bonneville salt flats. There, MOP precipitates as sylvinite in concentrator pans (after halite). The Bonneville region has a bittern hydrochemistry not unlike like the evolved Na-Cl brines of Salar de Atacama, as documented in the previous article, but it is a brinefield feed without the elevated levels of lithium seen in the Andean playa (Figure 3b).

Great Salt Lake brine contains abundant sulphate with levels sufficiently above calcium that sulphate continues to concentrate after most of the Ca has been used up in the precipitation of both aragonite and gypsum. Thus, as the brines in the anthropogenic pans at Ogden approach the bittern (post halite) stage, a series of sulphate double salts precipitate (Figure 4), along with carnallite and sylvite.


Great Salt Lake brines

The ionic proportions in the primary brine feed that is the endorheic Great Salt Lake water depends on a combination of; 1) the inflow volumes from three major rivers draining the ranges to the east, 2) groundwater inflow, 3) basin evaporation, and 4) precipitation (rainfall/snowfall) directly on the lake (Jones et al., 2009). Major solute inputs can be attributed to calcium bicarbonate-type river waters mixing with sodium chloride-type springs, which are in part hydrothermal and part peripheral recycling agents for NaCl held in the lake sediments. Spencer et al. (1985a) noted that prior to 1930, the lake concentration inversely tracked lake volume, which reflected climatic variation in the drainage. However, since that time, salt precipitation, primarily halite and mirabilite, and dissolution have periodically modified lake brine chemistry and led to density stratification and the formation of brine pockets of different composition.

Complicating these processes is repeated fractional crystallisation and re-solution (backreaction) of lake mineral precipitates. The construction of a railway causeway has restricted circulation, nearly isolating the northern from the southern part of the lake, which receives over 95% of the inflow. Given that Great Salt Lake waters are dominated by Na and Cl, this has led to halite precipitation in the north (Figures 2a, 3a; Gwynn, 2002). Widespread halite precipitation also occurred before 1959, especially in the southern area of the lake, associated with the most severe droughts (Jones et al., 2009; Spencer et al., 1985a). Spencer et al. (1985a) also described the presence of a sublacustrine ridge, which probably separated the lake into two basins at very low lake stands in the Quaternary. Fluctuating conditions emphasise brine differentiation, mixing, and fractional precipitation of salts as significant factors in solute evolution, especially as sinks for CaCO3, Mg, and K in the lake waters and sediments. The evolution of these brine/rock system depends on the concentration gradient and types of suspended and bottom clays, especially in relatively shallow systems.


Brine evolution across the Ogden pans

Figure 3a plots the known hydrochemistry of the inflow waters to the Great Salt Lake and their subsequent concentration. Evolving lake waters are always Na-Cl dominant, with sulphate in excess of magnesium in excess of potassium, throughout. Any post-halite evaporite minerals from this set of chemical proportions will contain post-halite potash bittern salts with elevated proportions of sulphate and magnesium and so will likely produce SOP rather than MOP associations. Contrast these hydrochemical proportions with the inflow and evolution chemistry in the pore brines of the Bonneville salt flat (Figure 3b) the Dead Sea and normal marine waters. Across all examples, sodium and chlorine are dominant and so halite will be the predominant salt deposited after aragonite and gypsum (Figure 4). Specifically, there are changes in sulphate levels with solar concentration (Figure 3b). In brines recovered from feeder wells in the Bonneville saltflat, unlike the nearby bajada well waters, the Bonneville salt flat brines show potassium in excess of sulphate and magnesium. In such a hydrochemical system, sylvite, as well as carnallite, are likely potassium bitterns in post-halite pans. The Wendover brine pans on the Bonneville saltflat produce MOP, not SOP, along with a MgCl2 brine, and have done so for more than 50 years (Bingham, 1980; Warren, 2016).


The mineral series in the Ogden pans

Figure 5 illustrates a laboratory-based construction of the idealised evolution of a Great Salt Lake feed brine as it passes through the various concentration pans. Figure 5 is a portion of the theoretical 25°C sulphate-potassium-magnesium phase diagram for the Great Salt Lake brine system and shows precipitates that are in equilibrium with brine at a particular concentration. Figures 4 and 5 represent typical brine concentration paths at summertime temperatures (Butts, 2002). Importantly, these figures do not describe the entire brine concentration story and local variations; mineralogical complexities in the predicted brine stream are related to thermal stratification, retention times and pond leakage. Effects on the chemistry of the brine due to the specific day-by-day and season-by-season variations of concentration and temperature, which arise in any solar ponding operation, require onsite monitoring and rectification. Such ongoing monitoring is of fundamental import when a pilot plant is constructed to test the reality of a future brine plant and its likely products.

 

Figure 6 illustrates the idealised phase evolution of pan brines at Ogden in terms of a K2SO4 phase diagram (no NaCl or KCl co-precipitates are shown; Felton et al., 2010). Great Salt Lake brine is pumped into the first set of solar ponds where evaporation initially proceeds along the line shown as Evap 1 until halite reaches saturation and is precipitated. Liquors discharged from the halite ponds are transferred to the potash precipitation ponds where solar evaporation continues as line Evap 2 on the phase diagram and potassium begins to reach saturation after about 75% of the water is removed. Potassium, sodium levels rise with further evaporation and schoenite precipitates in the schoenite crystalliser. After some schoenite precipitation occurs, the liquor continues to evaporate along the Evap 3 line to the point that schoenite, sylvite, and additional halite precipitate. Evaporation continues as shown by line Evap 3 to the point that kainite, sylvite and halite become saturated and precipitate. From this plot, the importance of the relative levels of extraction/precipitation of sulphate double salts versus chloride double salts is evident, as the evaporation plot point moves right with increasing chloride concentrations. That is, plot point follows the arrows from left to right as concentration of chloride (dominant ion in all pans) increases and moves the plot position right.


Production of SOP in the Great Salt Lake

To recover sulphate of potash commercially from pan bitterns fed from the waters of Great Salt Lake, the double salts kainite and schoenite are first precipitated and recovered in post-halite solar ponds (Figures 6, 7). The first salt to saturate and crystallise in the concentrator pans is halite. This is successively followed by epsomite, schoenite, kainite, carnallite, and finally bischofite. To produce a desirable SOP product requires ongoing in-pan monitoring and an on-site industrial plant whereby kainite is converted to schoenite. The complete salt evolution and processing plant outcome in the Ogden facility is multiproduct and can produce halite, salt cake and sulphate of potash and a MgCl2 brine product. Historically, sodium sulphate was recovered from the Great Salt Lake brines as a byproduct of the halite and potash production process, but ongoing low prices mean Na2SO4 has not been economically harvested for the last decade or so.

The complete production and processing procedure is as follows (Figure 7; Butts, 2002, 2007; Felton et al., 2010): 1) Brine is pumped from the Great Salt Lake into solar evaporation ponds where sodium chloride precipitates in the summer. 2) When winter weather cools the residual (post-halite) brine in the pans to -1 to -4°C, sodium sulphate crystals precipitate as mirabilite in a relatively pure state. Mirabilite crystals can be picked up by large earth-moving machinery and stored outdoors each winter until further processing takes place. 3) The harvested mirabilite can be added to hot water, and anhydrous sodium sulphate precipitated by the addition of sodium chloride to the heated mix to reduce sodium sulphate solubility through the common ion effect. The final salt cake product is 99.5% pure Na2SO4. 4) To produce SOP, Great Salt Lake brines are allowed to evaporate in a set of halite ponds, until approaching saturation with potassium salts. The residual brine is then transferred to a mixing pond, where it mixes with a second brine (from higher up the evaporation series, that contains a higher molar ratio of magnesium to potassium. 5) This adjusted brine is then allowed to evaporate to precipitate sodium chloride once more, until it is again saturated with respect to potassium salts. 6) The saturated brine is then transferred to another pond, is further evaporated and precipitates kainite (Figures 5, 6). Kainite precipitation continues until carnallite begins to form, at which time the brine is moved to another pond and is allowed to evaporate further to precipitate carnallite. 6) Some of the kainite-depleted brine is recycled to the downstream mixing pond to maintain the required molar ratio of magnesium to calcium in this earlier mixing pond (step 4). 7) Once carnallite has precipitated, the residual brine is transferred to deep storage and subjected to winter cooling to precipitate additional carnallite as it is a prograde salt. 8) Cryogenically precipitated carnallite can be processed to precipitate additional kainite by mixing it with a kainite-saturated brine. 9) MgCl2-rich end-brines in the post-carnallite bittern pans are then further processed to produce either MgCl2 flakes or a 32% MgCl2 brine. These end-bitterns are then used as a feedstock to make magnesium metal, bischofite flakes, dust suppressants, freeze preventers, fertiliser sprays, and used to refresh flush in ion exchange resins.

Some complexities in the observed mineral precipitation series in the Ogden Pans

Under natural solar pond conditions in the Ogden Pans, the brine temperature fluctuates with the air temperature across day-night and seasonal temperature cycles, and there is a lag time for temperature response in waters any brine pan, especially if the pan is heliothermic. Atmosphere-driven fluctuations in temperature results in changes in ion saturations, which can drive selective precipitation or dissolution of salts in the brine body. Air temperature in the Ogden pans may be 35°C during the day and 15°C at night. Brine at point A in figure 5 may favour the formation of kainite during the daytime and schoenite at night. The result of the diurnal temperature oscillation is a mixture of both salts in a single pond from the same brine. In terms of extracted product, this complicates ore processing as a single pan will contain both minerals, produced at the same curing stage, at the same time, yet one double salt entrains KCl, the other K2SO4, so additional processing is necessary to purify the product stream (Butts, 2002).

The sulphate ion in the pan waters is particularity temperature sensitive, and salts containing it in GSL pans tend to precipitate at cooler temperatures. Surficial cooling during the summer nights can cause prograde salts to precipitate, but the next day's heat generally provides sufficient activation energy to cause total dissolution of those salts precipitated just a few hours before (Butts, 2002). It is not unusual to find a 0.5 cm layer of hexahydrite (MgSO4.6H2O) at the bottom of a solar pond in the morning, but redissolved by late afternoon.

Under controlled laboratory conditions, brine collected from the hypersaline north arm of the Great Salt Lake will not crystallise mirabilite  until the brine temperature reaches 2°C or lower. Yet, in the anthropogenic solar ponds, mirabilite has been observed to crystallise at brine temperatures above 7°C. During the winter, as the surface temperature of the GSL pan brine at night becomes very cold (2°C or lower), especially on clear nights, and mirabilite rafts will form on and just below the brine surface and subsequently sink into the somewhat warmer brine at the floor of the pond. Because there is insufficient activation energy in this brine to completely redissolve the mirabilite, it remains on the pan floor, until warmer day/night temperatures are attained. However, it is also possible for salts precipitated by cooling to be later covered by salts precipitated by evaporation, which effectively prevents dissolution of those more temperature-sensitive salts that would otherwise redissolve (Butts, 2002).

There are also longer terms seasonal influences on mineralogy. Some salts deposited in June, July, and August (summer) will convert to other salts, with a possible total change in chemistry, when they are exposed to colder winter temperatures and rainfall. Kainite, for example, may convert to sylvite and epsomite and become a hardened mass on the pond floor; or if it is in contact with a sulphate-rich brine, it can convert to schoenite. Conversely, mirabilite will precipitate in the winter but redissolve during the hot summer months.

The depth of a solar pond also controls the size of the crystals produced. For example, if halite (NaCl) is precipitated in a GSL pond that is either less than 8 cm or more than 30cm deep, it will have a smaller crystal size than when precipitated in a pond between 8 and 30 cm deep. Smaller crystals of halite are undesirable in a de-icing product since a premium price is paid for larger crystals.

In terms of residence time, some salts require more time than others to crystallise in a pan. Brine that is not given sufficient time for crystallisation before it is moved into another pond, which contains brine at a different concentration, will produce a different suite of salts. For example, if a brine supersaturated in ions that will produce kainite, epsomite, and halite (reaction I), is transferred to another pond, the resulting brine mixture can favour carnallite (reaction 2), while kainite salts are eliminated.

Reaction 1: 9.75H2O + Na+ + 2Cl- + 2Mg2+ + K+ + 2SO42+ —> MgSO4.KCl +2.75H2O + MgSO4.7H2O + NaCl

Reaction 2: 12H2O + Na+ + 4Cl- + 2Mg2+ + K+ + 2SO42+ —> MgCl2.6H2O +MgSO4.6H2O + NaCl

Reaction 1 retains more magnesium as MgCl2 in the brine; reaction 2 retains more sulphate. In reaction 2, it is also interesting to note the effect of waters-of-hydration on crystallization; forcing out salts with high waters of crystallization results in higher rates of crystallization. The hydrated salts remove waters from the brine and further concentrate the brine in much the same way as does evaporation.

Pond leakage and brine capture (entrainment) in and below the pan floor are additional influences on mineralogy, regardless of brine depth or ponding area. As mentioned earlier, to precipitate bischofite and allow for MgCl2 manufacture, around ninety-eight percent of the water from present North Arm brine feed must evaporate. If pond leakage causes the level of the ponding area to drop too quickly, it becomes near impossible to reach saturation for bischofite (due to brine reflux). Control of pond leakage in the planning and construction phases is essential to assure that the precipitated salts contain the optimal quantity of the desired minerals for successful pond operation.

The opposite of leakage is brine retention in a precipitated layer; it can also alter brine chemistry and recovery economics. Brine entrained (or trapped) in the voids between salt crystals in the pond floor is effectively removed from salt production and so affects the chemistry of salts that will be precipitated as concentration proceeds and can also drive unwanted backreactions. The time required to evaporate nearly ninety percent of the water from the present north arm Great Salt Lake brine in the Ogden solar pond complex, under natural steady state conditions, is approximately eighteen months.

Summary of SOP production procedures in Great Salt Lake

Sulphate of potash cannot be obtained from the waters of the Great Salt Lake by simple solar evaporation (Behrens, 2002). As the lake water is evaporated, first halite precipitates in a relatively pure form and is harvested. By the time evaporative concentration has proceeded to the point that saturation in a potash-entraining salt occurs, most of the NaCl has precipitated. It does, however, continue to precipitate and becomes the primary contaminant in the potassium-bearing salt beds in the higher-end pans.

Brine phase chemistry from the point of potassium saturation in the evaporation series is complicated, and an array of potassium double salts are possible, depending on brine concentration, temperature and other factors. Among the variety of potash minerals precipitated in the potash harvester pans, the majority are double salts that contain atoms of both potassium and magnesium in the same molecule, They are dominated by kainite, schoenite, and carnallite. All are highly hydrated; that is, they contain high levels of water of crystallisation that must be removed during processing. SOP purification also involves removal of the considerable quantities of sodium chloride that are co-precipitated, after this the salts must be chemically converted into potassium sulphate.

Controlling the exact mineralogy of the precipitated salts and their composition mixtures is not possible in the pans, which are subject to the vagaries of climate and associated temperature variations. Many of the complex double salts precipitating in the pans are stable only under fixed physiochemical conditions, so that transitions of composition may take place in the ponds and even in the stockpile and early processing plant steps.

While weathering, draining, temperature and other factors can be controlled to a degree, it is essential that the Great Salt Lake plant be able to handle and effectively accommodate a widely variable feed mix (Behrens 2002). To do this, the plant operator has developed a basic process comprising a counter-current leach procedure for converting the potassium-bearing minerals through known mineral transition stages to a final potassium sulfate product (Figure 7). This set of processing steps is sensitive to sodium chloride content, so a supplemental flotation circuit is used to handle those harvested salts high in halite. It aims to remove the halite (in solution) and upgrade the feed stream to the point where it can be handled by the basic plant process.

Solids harvested from the potash ponds with elevated halite levels are treated with anionic flotation to remove remaining halite (Felton et al., 2010). To convert kainite into schoenite, it is necessary to mix the upgraded flotation product with a prepared brine. The conversion of schoenite to SOP at the Great Salt Lake plant requires that new MOP is added, over the amount produced from the lake brines. This additional MOP is purchased from the open market. The schoenite solids are mixed with potash in a draft tube baffle reactor to produce SOP and byproduct magnesium chloride.

The potassium sulfate processing stream defining the basic treatment process in the Great Salt Lake plant is summarised as Figure 7, whereby once obtaining the appropriate chemistry the SOP product is ultimately filtered, dried, sized and stored. Final SOP output may then be compacted, graded, and provided with additives as desired, then distributed in bulk or bagged, by rail or truck.


Lop Nur, Tarim Basin, China (SOP operation)

Sulphate of potash (SOP) via brine processing (solution mining) of lake sediments and subsequent solar concentration of brines is currently underway in the fault-bound Luobei Hollow region of the Lop Nur playa, in the southeastern part of Xinjiang Province, Western China (Liu et al., 2006; Sun et al., 2018). The recoverable sulphate of potash resource is estimated to be 36 million tonnes from lake brine (Dong et al., 2012). Lop Nur lies in the eastern part of the Taklimakan Desert (Figure 8a), China’s largest and driest desert, and is in the drainage sump of the basin, some 780 meters above sea level in a BSk climate belt. The Lop Nur depression first formed in the early Quaternary, due to the extensional collapse of the eastern Tarim Platform and is surrounded and typically in fault contact with the Kuruktagh (to the north), Bei Shan (to east) and Altun (to the south) mountains (Figure 8b).

The resulting Lop Nur (Lop Nor) sump is a large groundwater discharge playa that is the terminal point of China’s largest endorheic drainage system, the Tarim Basin, which occupies an area of more than 530,000 km2 (Ma et al., 2010). The Lop Nur sump is the hydrographic base level to local and regional groundwater and surface water flow systems, and thus collectively captures all river and subsurface flow originating in the surrounding mountainous regions. The area has been subject to ongoing Quaternary climate and water supply oscillations, which over the last few hundred years has driven concentric strandzone contractions on the playa surface, to form what is sometimes called the “Great Ear Lake" of the Lop Nur sump (Liu et al., 2016a).

Longer term widespread climate oscillations (thousands of years) drove precipitation of saline glauberite-polyhalite deposits, alternating with more humid lacustrine mudstones especially in fault defined grabens with the sump. For example, Liu et al. (2016b) conducted high-resolution multi-proxy analyses using materials from a well-dated pit section (YKD0301) in the centre of Lop Nur and south of the Luobei depression. They showed that Lop Nur experienced a progression through a brackish lake, saline lake, slightly brackish lake, saline lake, brackish lake, and playa in response to climatic changes over the past 9,000 years.

Presently, the Lop Nur playa lacks perennial long-term surface inflow and so is characterised by desiccated saline mudflats and polygonal salt crusts. The upward capillary flux from the shallow groundwater helps to maintain a high rate of evaporation in the depression and drives the formation of a metre-thick ephemeral halite crust that covers much of the depression (Liu et al., 2016a).

Historically, before construction of extensive irrigation systems in the upstream portion of the various riverine feeds to the depression and the diversion of water into the Tarim-Kongqi-Qargan canal, brackish floodwaters periodically accumulated in the Lop Nur depression. After the diversion of inflows, terminal desiccation led to the formation of the concentric shrinkage shorelines, that today outline the “Great Ear Lake” region of the Tarim Basin (Figure 8b; Huntington, 1907; Chao et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2016a).

The current climate is cool and extremely arid (Koeppen BSk); average annual rainfall is less than 20 mm and the average potential evaporation rates ≈3500 mm/yr (Ma et al., 2008, 2010). The mean annual air temperature is 11.6°C; higher temperatures occur during July (>40°C), and the lower temperatures occur during January (<20°C). Primary wind direction is northeast. The Lop Nor Basin experiences severe and frequent sandstorms; the region is well known for its wind-eroded features, including many layered yardangs along the northern, western and eastern margins of the Lop Nur salt plain (Lin et al., 2018).


Salinity and chemical composition of modern groundwater brine varies little in the ‘‘Great Ear” area and appears not to have changed significantly over the last decade (Ma et al., 2010). Dominant river inflows to the Lop Nor Basin are Na-Mg-Ca-SO4-Cl-HCO3 waters (Figure 9). In contrast, the sump region is characterised by highly concentrated groundwater brines (≈350 mg/l) that are rich in Na and Cl, poor in Ca and HCO3+CO3, and contain considerable amounts of Mg, SO4 and K, with pH ranging from 6.6 to 7.2 (Figure 9). When concentrated, the Luobei/Lop Nur pore brines is saturated with respect to halite, glauberite, thenardite, polyhalite and bloedite (Ma et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2018).

Groundwater brines, pooled in the northern sub-depression, mostly in the Luobei depression, are pumped into a series of pans to the immediate south, where sulphate of potash is produced via a set of solar concentrator pans. Brines in the Luobei depression and adjacent Xingqing and Tenglong platforms are similar in chemistry and salinity to the Great Ear Lake area but with a concentrated saline reserve due to the presence of a series of buried glauberite-rich beds (Figure 9; Hu and Wang, 2001; Ma et al., 2010; Sun et al., 2018).

K-rich mother brines in the Luobei hollow also contain significant MgSO4 levels and fill open phreatic pores in a widespread subsurface glauberite bed, with a potassium content of 1.4% (Liu et al., 2008; Sun et al., 2018). Feed brines are pumped from these evaporitic sediment hosts in the Luobei sump into a large field of concentrator pans to ultimately produce sulphate of potash (Figure 8a).

Brine chemical models, using current inflow water and groundwater brine chemistries and assuming open-system hydrology, show good agreement between theoretically predicted and observed minerals in upper parts of the Lop Nor Basin succession (Ma et al., 2010). However, such shallow sediment modelling does not explain the massive amounts of glauberite (Na2SO4.CaSO4) and polyhalite (K2SO4MgSO4.2CaSO4.2H2O) recovered in a 230 m deep core (ZK1200B well) from the Lop Nor Basin (Figure 9a).


Hydrochemical simulations assuming a closed system at depth and allowing brine reactions with previously formed minerals imply that widespread glauberite in the basin formed via back reactions between brine, gypsum and anhydrite and that polyhalite formed via a diagenetic reaction between brine and glauberite. Diagenetic textures related to recrystallisation and secondary replacement are seen in the ZK1200B core; they include gypsum-cored glauberite crystals and gypsum replacing glauberite. Such textures indicate significant mineral-brine interaction and backreaction during crystallisation of glauberite and polyhalite (Liu et al., 2008). Much of the glauberite dissolves to create characteristic mouldic porosity throughout the glauberite reservoir intervals (Figure 10, 11b)


Mineral assemblages predicted from the evaporation of Tarim river water match closely with natural assemblages and abundances and, in combination with a model that allows widespread backreactions, can explain the extensive glauberite deposits in the Lop Nor basin (Ma et al., 2008, 2010). It seems that the Tarim river inflows, not fault-controlled upwelling hydrothermal brines, were the dominant ion source throughout the lake history. The layered distribution of minerals in the more deeply cored sediments documents the evolving history of inflow water response to wet and dry periods in the Lop Nor basin. The occurrence of abundant glauberite and gypsum below 40 m depth, and the absence of halite, polyhalite and bloedite in the same sediment suggests that the brine underwent incomplete concentration in the wetter periods 10b).

In contrast, the increasing abundance of halite, polyhalite and bloedite in the top 40 m of core from the ZK1200B well indicate relatively dry periods (Figure 10a), where halite precipitated at lower evaporative concentrations (log Concentration factor = 3.15), while polyhalite and bloedite precipitated at higher evaporative concentrations (log = 3.31 and 3.48 respectively). Following deposition of the more saline minerals, the lake system once again became more humid in the later Holocene, until the anthropogenically-induced changes in the hydrology over the last few decades, driven by upstream water damming and extraction for agriculture (Ma et al., 2008). These changes have returned the sump hydrology to the more saline character that it had earlier in the Pleistocene.

The Lop Nur potash recovery plant/factory and pan system, located adjacent to the LuoBei depression (Figures 8, 11a), utilises a brine-well source aquifer where the potash brine is reservoired in intercrystalline and vuggy porosity in a thick stacked series of porous glauberite beds/aquifers.

Currently, 200 boreholes have been drilled in the Lop Nor brine field area showing the Late-Middle Pleistocene to Late Pleistocene strata are distributed as massive, continuous, thick layers of glauberite with well-developed intercrystal and mouldic porosity, forming storage space for potassium-rich brine (Figure 11b; Sun et al., 2018). However, buried faults and different rates of creation of fault-bound accommodation space, means there are differences in the brine storage capacity among the three brinefield extraction areas; termed the Luobei depression, the Xingqing platform and the Tenglong platform areas (Figures 9a, 11a).

In total, there are seven glauberitic brine beds defined by drill holes in the Luobei depression, including a phreatic aquifer, W1L, and six artesian aquifers, W2L, W3L, W4L, W5L, W6L, and W7 (Figure 10b; Sun et al., 2018). At present, only W1L, W2L, W3L, and W4L glauberite seams are used as brine sources. There are two artesian brine aquifers, W2X and W3X, exposed by drill holes in the Xinqing platform and there are three beds in the Tenglong extraction area, including a phreatic aquifer, W1T, and two artesian aquifers, W2T and W3T (Figure 10b).

W1L is a phreatic aquifer with layered distribution across the whole Luobei depression, with an average thickness of 17.54 m, water table depths of 1.7 to 2.3 m, porosities of 6.98% to 38.45%, and specific yields of 4.57% to 25.89%. Water yield is the highest in the central and northeast of the depression, with unit brine overflows of more than 5000 cubic meters per day per meter of water table depth (m3/dm). In the rest of the aquifer, the unit brine overflows range from 1000 to 5000 m3/dm (Sun et al., 2018). The W2L artesian aquifer is confined, nearly horizontal with a stratified distribution, and has an average thickness of 10.18 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 20 to 40 m, porosities of 4.34% to 37.8%, and specific yields of 1.08% to 21.04%. The W3L artesian aquifer is confined, with stratified distribution and an average thickness of 8.50 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 40 to 70 m, porosities of 2.85% to 19.97%, and specific yields of 1.10% to 13.37%. The W3L aquifer is also confined with stratified distribution, with an average thickness of 7.28 m, unit brine overflows of 10 to 100 m3/dm, water table depths of 70 to 100 m, porosities of 5.22% to 24.72%, and specific yields of 1.03% to 9.91%. The lithologies of the four brine storage layers are dominated by glauberite, and occasional lacustrine sedimentary clastic rocks, such as gypsum (Figure 10a).

The Xinqing platform consists of two confined potassium-bearing brine aquifers (Figure 10b). Confined brines have layered or stratified distributions. The average thicknesses of the aquifers are 4.38 to 7.52 m. Due to the F1 fault, there is no phreatic aquifer in the Xinqing platform, but this does not affect the continuity of the brine storage layer between the extraction areas. The W2X aquifer is confined, stratified, and distributed in the eastern part of this ore district with a north-south length of 77.78 km, east-west width of 16.82 km, and total area of 1100 km2. Unit brine overflows are 2.25 to 541.51 m3/dm, water table depths are 10 to 20 m, porosities are 3.89% to 40.69%, and specific yields are 2.01% to 21.15%. The W3X aquifer is also confined and stratified, with a north-south length of 76.10 km, east-west width of 18.81 km, and total area of 1444 km2. Unit brine overflows are 1.67 to 293.99 m3/d m, water table depths are 11.3 to 38 m, porosities are 4.16% to 26.43%, and specific yields are 2.11% to 14.19%23.

The Tenglong platform consists of a phreatic aquifer and two confined aquifers. W1T is a phreatic, stratified aquifer and is the main ore body, and is bound by the F3 fault (Figure 10b). It is distributed across the northern part of the Tenglong extraction area, with a north-south length of about 33 km, east-west width of about 20 km, and total area of 610 km2. Water table depths are 3.26 to 4.6 m, porosities are 2.03% to 38.81%, and specific yields are 22.48% to 1.22%. On the other side of the F3 fault, in the southern part of the mining area, is the W2T confined aquifer (Figure 10b). Water table depths are 16.91 to 22 m, porosities are 3.58% to 37.64%, and specific yields are 1.35% to 18.69%. W3T is also a confined aquifer, with a stratified orebody distributed in the southern part of the mining area, with a north-south length of about 29 km, east-west width of about 21 km, and total area of 546 km2. Water table depths are 17.13 to 47 m, porosities are 2.69% to 38.71%, and specific yields are 1.26% to 17.64%.

Lop Nur is an unusual potash source

The glauberite-hosted brinefield in the Luobei depression and the adjacent platforms makes the Lop Nur SOP system unique in that it is the world's first large-scale example of brine commercialisation for potash recovery in a Quaternary continental playa aquifer system with a non-MOP brinefield target. Elsewhere, such as in the Dead Sea and the Qarhan sump, Salar de Atacama and the Bonneville salt flats, the brines derived from Quaternary lacustrine beds and water bodies are concentrated via solar evaporation in semi-arid desert scenarios. Potash plants utilising these Quaternary evaporite-hosted lacustrine brine systems do not target potassium sulphate, but process either carnallitite or sylvinite into a commercial MOP product

 Glauberite is found in a range of other continental Quaternary evaporite deposits around the world but, as yet,                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       outside of Lop Nur is not economically exploited to produce sulphate of potash. For example, glauberite is a significant component in Quaternary cryogenic beds in Karabogazgol on the eastern shore of the Caspian Sea, in Quaternary evaporite beds in Laguna del Rey in Mexico, in saline lacustrine beds in the Miocene of Spain and Turkey, and in pedogenic beds in hyperarid nitrate-rich soils of the Atacama Desert of South America (Warren, 2016; Chapter 12).

In most cases, the deposits are commercially exploited as a source of sodium sulphate (salt cake). In a saline Quaternary lake in Canada, SOP is produced by processing saline lake waters. This takes place in Quill Lake, where small volumes of SOP are produced via mixing a sylvite feed (trucked into the site) with a cryogenic NaSO4 lake brine.

The Lop Nur deposit is mined by the SDIC Xinjiang Luobupo Hoevellite Co. Ltd, and the main product is potassium sulfate, with a current annual production capacity of 1.3 million tons. Pan construction began in 2000, and the plant moved in full -cale operation in 2004 when it produced ≈50,000 tons. The parent company, State Development and Investment Corporation (SDIC), is China’s largest state-owned investment holding company. The company estimates a potash reserve ≈ 12.2 billion tons in the sump. This makes Lop Nur deposit the largest SOP facility in the world, and it is now a significant supplier of high premium fertiliser to the Chinese domestic market.

Implications

A study of a few of the Quaternary pans worldwide manufacturing economic levels of potash via solar evaporation shows tha,t independent of whether SOP or MOP salts are the main product, all retain abundant evidence that salt precipitates continue to evolve as the temperature and the encasing brine chemistry change. As we shall see in many ancient examples discussed in the next article, ongoing postdepositional mineralogical alteration dominates the textural and mineralogical story in most ancient potash deposits.

As we saw in the previous article, which focused on MOP in solar concentrator plants with brine feeds from Quaternary saline lakes, SOP production from brine feeds in Quaternary saline lakes is also related strongly to cooler desert climates (Figure 12). The Koeppen climate at Lop Nur is cool arid desert (BWk), while the Great Salt Lake straddles cool arid steppe desert and a temperate climate zone, with hot dry summer zones (BSk and Csa)


Outside of these two examples, there are a number of other Quaternary potash mineral occurrences with the potential for SOP production, if a suitable brine processing stream can be devised (Warren, 2010, 2016). These sites include intermontane depressions in the high Andes in what is a high altitude polar tundra setting (Koeppen ET), none of which are commercial (Figure 12b).

Similarly, there a number of non-commercial potash (SOP) mineral and brine occurrences in various hot arid desert regions in Australia, northern Africa and the Middle East (Koeppen BWh). Today, SOP in Salar de Atacama is currently produced as a byproduct of lithium carbonate production, along with MOP, as discussed in the previous article in this series.

As for MOP, climatically, commercial potash brine SOP systems are hosted in Quaternary-age lacustrine sediments are located in cooler endorheic intermontane depressions (BWk, BSk). The association with somewhat cooler desert and less arid cool steppe climates underlines the need for greater volumes of brine to reside in the landscape in order to facilitate the production of significant volumes of potash bittern.

Put simply, in the case of both MOP and SOP production in Quaternary settings, hot arid continental deserts simply do not have enough flowable water to produce economic volumes of a chemically-suitable mother brine. That is, currently economic Quaternary MOP and SOP operations produce by pumping nonmarine pore or saline lake brines into a set of concentrator pans. Mother waters reside in hypersaline perennial lakes in steep-sided valleys or in pores in salt-entraining aquifers with dissolving salt compositions supplying  a suitable ionic proportions in the mother brine. In terms of annual volume of product sold into the world market, Quaternary brine systems supply less than 15% The remainder comes from the mining of a variety of ancient solid-state potash sources. In the third and final article in this series, we shall discuss how and why the chemistry and hydrogeology of these ancient potash sources is mostly marine-fed and somewhat different from the continental hydrologies addressed so far.

References

Behrens, P., 2002, Industrial processing of Great Salt lake Brines by Great Salt Lake Minerals and Chemical Corporation, in D. T. Gywnne, ed., Great Salt Lake: A scientific, historical and economic overview, Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Bulletin 116, p. 223-228.

Bingham, C. P., 1980, Solar production of potash from brines of the Bonneville Salt Flats, in J. W. Gwynn, ed., Great Salt Lake; a scientific, history and economic overview. , v. 116, Bulletin Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, p. 229-242.

Butts, D., 2002, Chemistry of Great Salt Lake Brines in Solar Ponds, in D. T. Gywnne, ed., Great Salt Lake: A scientific, historical and economic overview, Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, Bulletin 116, p. 170-174.

Butts, D., 2007, Chemicals from Brines, Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., p. 784-803.

Chao, L., P. Zicheng, Y. Dong, L. Weiguo, Z. Zhaofeng, H. Jianfeng, and C. Chenlin, 2009, A lacustrine record from Lop Nur, Xinjiang, China: Implications for paleoclimate change during Late Pleistocene: Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, v. 34, p. 38-45.

Dong, Z., P. Lv, G. Qian, X. Xia, Y. Zhao, and G. Mu, 2012, Research progress in China's Lop Nur: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 111, p. 142-153.

Felton, D., J. Waters, R. Moritz, D., and T. A. Lane, 2010, Producing Sulfate of Potash from Polyhalite with Cost Estimates, Gustavson Associates, p. 19.

Hu, G., and N.-a. Wang, 2001, The sand wedge and mirabilite of the last ice age and their paleoclimatic significance in Hexi Corridor: Chinese Geographical Science, v. 11, p. 80-86.

Huntington, E., 1907, Lop-Nor. A Chinese Lake. Part 1. The Unexplored Salt Desert of Lop: Bulletin of the American Geographical Society, v. 39, p. 65-77.

Jones, B., D. Naftz, R. Spencer, and C. Oviatt, 2009, Geochemical Evolution of Great Salt Lake, Utah, USA: Aquatic Geochemistry, v. 15, p. 95-121.

Lin, Y., L. Xu, and G. Mu, 2018, Differential erosion and the formation of layered yardangs in the Loulan region (Lop Nur), eastern Tarim Basin: Aeolian Research, v. 30, p. 41-47.

Liu, C., W. Mili, J. Pengcheng, L. I. Shude, and C. Yongzhi, 2006, Features and Formation Mechanism of Faults and Potash-forming Effect in the Lop Nur Salt Lake, Xinjiang, China: Acta Geologica Sinica - English Edition, v. 80, p. 936-943.

Liu, C.-A., H. Gong, Y. Shao, Z. Yang, L. Liu, and Y. Geng, 2016a, Recognition of salt crust types by means of PolSAR to reflect the fluctuation processes of an ancient lake in Lop Nur: Remote Sensing of Environment, v. 175, p. 148-157.

Liu, C. L., M. L. Wang, P. C. Jiao, W. D. Fan, Y. Z. Chen, Z. C. Yang, and J. G. Wang, 2008, Sedimentary characteristics and origin of polyhalite in Lop Nur Salt Lake,Xinjiang: Mineral Deposits.

Liu, C. L., J. F. Zhang, P. C. Jiao, and S. Mischke, 2016b, The Holocene history of Lop Nur and its palaeoclimate implications: Quaternary Science Reviews, v. 148, p. 163-175.

Ma, C., F. Wang, Q. Cao, X. Xia, S. Li, and X. Li, 2008, Climate and environment reconstruction during the Medieval Warm Period in Lop Nur of Xinjiang, China: Chinese Science Bulletin, v. 53, p. 3016-3027.

Ma, L., T. K. Lowenstein, B. Li, P. Jiang, C. Liu, J. Zhong, J. Sheng, H. Qiu, and H. Wu, 2010, Hydrochemical characteristics and brine evolution paths of Lop Nor Basin, Xinjiang Province, Western China: Applied Geochemistry, v. 25, p. 1770-1782.

Spencer, R. J., H. P. Eugster, and B. F. Jones, 1985b, Geochemistry of Great Salt Lake, Utah II: Pleistocene-Holocene evolution: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 49, p. 739-747.

Spencer, R. J., H. P. Eugster, B. F. Jones, and S. L. Rettig, 1985a, Geochemistry of Great Salt Lake, Utah I: Hydrochemistry since 1850: Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, v. 49, p. 727-737.

Sun, M.-g., and L.-c. Ma, 2018, Potassium-rich brine deposit in Lop Nor basin, Xinjiang, China: Scientific Reports, v. 8, p. 7676.

Warren, J. K., 2010, Evaporites through time: Tectonic, climatic and eustatic controls in marine and nonmarine deposits: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 98, p. 217-268.

Warren, J. K., 2016, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3): Berlin, Springer, 1854 p.

 

Danakil potash: K2SO4 across the Neogene: Implications for Danakhil potash, Part 4 of 4

John Warren - Tuesday, May 12, 2015

How to deal with K2SO4

In this the fourth blog focusing on Danakhil potash, we look at the potash geology of formerly mined Neogene deposits in Sicily and the Ukraine, then compare them and relevant processing techniques used to exploit their K2SO4 ore feeds. This information is then used to help guide a discussion of processing implications for potash extraction in the Danakhil, where kainite is the dominant widespread potash salt. As seen in the previous three blogs there are other potash mineral styles present in the Danakhil, which constitute more restricted ore fairways than the widespread bedded kainaite, these other potash styles (deep meteoiric -blog 2 of 4 and hydrothermal - blog 3 of 4), could be processed to extract MOP, but these other potash styles are also tied to high levels of MgCl2, which must be dealt with in the brine processing stream. The most effective development combination is to understand the three occurence styles , define appropriate specific brine processing strams and then combine the products in an single processing plant and then produce sulphate of potash (SOP), rather the Muriate of Potash (MOP), as SOP has a 30% price premium in current potash markets.

Kainite dominated the bedded potash ore feed in former mines in the Late Miocene (Messinian) sequence in Sicily and the Middle Miocene (Badenian) sequence in the Carpathian foredeep], Ukraine. Kainite also occurs in a number of potash deposits in the Permian of Germany and Russia. In Germany a combination of mined sylvite and kieserite is used to manufacture sulphate of potash (SOP). Interestingly, Neogene and the Permian are times when world ocean waters were enriched in MgSO4 (Lowenstein et al., 2001, 2003). In contrast, much of the Phanerozoic was typified by an ocean where MgSO4 levels were less. It is from such marine brine feeds that most of the world’s larger Phaneorzoic (SOP) potash ore deposits were precipitated (Warren, 2015). SOP is also produced from Quaternary Lake brines in China and Canada (see cryogenic salt blog; 24 Feb. 2015).

SOP in Messinian evaporites, Sicily

A number of potash mines on the island extracted kainitite from the late Miocene Solofifera Series of Sicily (Figure 1). The last of these mines closed in the mid-1990s, but portions of some are maintained and are still accessible (eg Realmonte mine). The halite-hosted potash deposits are isolated ore bodies within two generally parallel troughs, 115 km long and 5- 10 km wide, within the Caltanissetta Basin (Figure 1). They are separated by a thrust-related high 11-25 km wide and capped by the limestones of the “Calcare di Base”. Kainite is the dominant potash mineral in the mined deposits. Across the basin, ore levels constitute six layers of variable thickness, with a grade of 10%-16% K2O (pure kainite contains 18.9% K20), with very little insoluble content (0.4%-2.0%).

At the time the potash was deposited there was considerable tectonic activity in the area (Roveri et al. 2008, Manzi et al., 2011). Host sediments were deposited in piggy-back basins some 5.5 Ma atop a series of regional thrusts, so the ore layers have dips in the mines ranging up to 60° (Figure 2). Little if any of the limestone associated with the deposits was converted to dolomite, nor was the thick Messinian gypsum (upper and lower units), encasing the halite /kainitite units, converted to anhydrite, it remains as gypsum with well preserved depositional textures. However, the elevated salinities, and perhaps temperatures, required for kainite precipitation means anhydrite micronodules, observed in some ore levels, may be primary or syndepositional. A lack of carnallite, along with isotopic data, indicates that when the deposits were formed by the evaporation of the seawater, salinities did not usually proceed far past the kainite crystallization point (in contrast to Ethiopia where carnallite salinities typify the later stages of kainitite deposition)..

 

The largest Sicilian ore body was at Pasquasia, to the west of Calanisseta, covering a 24 km2 area at depths of 300-800 m (Figure 1). There were five ore beds at Pasquasia, all with highly undulating synclinal and anticlinal forms. The Number 2 bed was the thickest, averaging perhaps a 30-m thickness of 10.5% to 13.5% K2O ore. The Pasquasia Mine was last operational from 1952 to 1992.

 

Ore geology remains somewhat more accessible at the former Realmonte mine, near the town of Agrigento. There, four main depositional units (A to D from base to top) typify the evaporite geology. As at Pasquasia, kainitite was the targeted ore within a Messinian evaporite section that has total thickness of 400-600 m. As defined by Decima and Wezel, 1971, 1973; Decima, 1988, Lugli, 1999, the Realmonte mine section is made up of 4 units (Figure 2a):

- Unit A (up to 50 m thick): composed of evenly laminated grey halite with white anhydrite nodules and laminae that pass upward to grey massive halite beds.

- Unit B (total thickness ≈100 m): this potash entraining interval is dominated by massive even layers of grey halite, interbedded with light grey thin kainite laminae and minor grey centimetre-scale polyhalite spherules and laminae, along with anhydrite laminae; the upper part of the unit contains at least six light grey kainite layers up to 18 m-thick that were the targeted ore sequence. Unlike the Danakil, carnallite does not typify the upper part of this marine potash section. The targeted beds are in the low-angle dip portion of a thrust-folded remnant in a structural basin (Figures 2b, 3).

- Unit C (70-80 m thick): is made up of white halite layers 10-20 cm thick, separated by irregular dark grey mud laminae and minor light grey polyhalite and anhydrite laminae (Figure 3).

- Unit D (60 m thick): is composed of a grey anhydritic mudstone (15-20 m thick), passing up into an anhydrite laminite sequence, followed by grey halite millimetre to centimetre layers intercalated with white anhydrite laminae.


According to Lugli, 1999, units A and B are made up of cumulates of well-sorted halite plate crystals, up to a few millimeters in size. Kainite typically forms discrete laminae and sutured crystal mosaic beds, ranging from a thickness of few mm to a maximum of 2 m, intercalated and embedded within unit B (Garcia-Veigas et al., 1995). It may also occur as small isometric crystals scattered within halite mosaics. Kainite textures are dominated by packed equant-granular mosaics, which show possible pressure-dissolution features at some grain boundaries. The associated halite layers are dominantly cumulates, which show no evidence of bottom overgrowth chevrons, implying evaporite precipitation was a “rain from heaven” pelagic style that took place in a stratified permanently subaqueous brine water body, possibly with a significant water depth to the bottom of the permanent lower water mass.

Only the uppermost part of potash bearing portion of unit B shows a progressive appearance of large halite rafts along with localized dissolution pits filled by mud, suggesting an upward shallowing of the basin at that time. In many parts of the Realmonte mine spectacular vertical fissures cut through the topmost part of unit B at the boundary with unit C, suggesting desiccation and subaerial exposure at this level (Lugli et al., 1999).

The overlying unit C is composed of cumulates of halite skeletal hoppers that evolve into halite chevrons illustrating bottom growth after foundering of the initial halite rafts. Halite layers in unit C show numerous dissolution pits filled by mud and irregular truncation of the upper crystal terminations, implying precipitation from a nonstratified, relatively shallow water body. Palaeo-temperatures of the brine that precipitated these halite crystals are highly variable from 22 to 32°C (Lugli and Lowenstein, 1997) and suggest a shallow hydrologically unstable body of water, unlike units A and B.

The bromine content of halite increases from the base of unit A to the horizons containing kainite (layer B) where it obtains values of up to 150 ppm. Upwards, the bromine content decreases once more to where at the top of Unit C it drops below 13 ppm, likely indicating a marked dilution of the mother brine. The dilution is likely a consequence of recycling (dissolution and reprecipitation) of previously deposited halite either by meteoric-continental waters (based on Br content; Decima 1978), or by seawater (based on the high sulphate concentration and significant potassium and magnesium content of fluid inclusions; Garcia-Veigas et al., 1995).

As in the Danakhil succession, evaporite precipitation at Realmonte began as halite-CaSO4 interlayered succession at the bottom of a stratified perennial water body, which shallowed and increased in concentration until reaching potash kainite saturation. In Sicily, this was followed by a period of exposure and desiccation indicated by the presence of giant megapolygonal structures. Finally, seawater flooded the salt pan again, dissolving and truncating part of the previous halite layers, which was then redeposited under shallow-water conditions at the bottom of a nonstratified (holomitic) water body (Lugli et al., 1997, 1999).

Unlike Ethiopia, the Neogene kainite deposits of Sicily were deposited in a thrust “piggy-back” basin setting and not in a rift sump (Figure 2b). Mineralogically similar, very thick, rift-related, now halokinetic, halite deposits of Midddle Miocene age occur under the Red Sea’s coastal plain between Jizan, Saudi Arabia (where they outcrop) to Safaga, Egypt, with limited potash is found in some Red Sea locations at depths suitable for solution mining (Notholt 1983; Garrett, 1995). Potash-enriched marine end-liquor brines characterise Red Sea geothermal springs, implying a more sizeable potash mass may be (or once have been) present in this region. Hite and Wassef (1983) argue gamma ray peaks in two drill hole logs in this area suggest the presence of sylvite, carnallite and possibly langbeinite at depth.

K2SO4 salts in Miocene of Ukraine

Miocene salt deposits occur in the western Ukraine within two structural terranes: 1) Carpathian Foredeep (rock and potash salt) and (II) Transcarpathian trough (rock salt) (Figure 4a). These salt-bearing deposits differ in the thickness and lithology depending on the regional tectonic location (Czapowski et al., 2009). In the Ukrainian part of Carpathian Foredeep, three main tectonic zones were distinguished (Figure 4b): (I) outer zone (Bilche-Volytsya Unit), in which the Miocene molasse deposits overlie discordantly the Mesozoic platform basement at the depth of 10-200 m, and in the foredeep they subsided under the overthrust of the Sambir zone and are at depths of 1.2-2.2 km (Bukowski and Czapowski, 2009); Hryniv et al., 2007); (II) central zone (Sambir Unit), in which the Miocene deposits were overthrust some 8-12 km onto the external part of the Foredeep deposits of the external zone occur at depths of 1.0-2.2 km; (III) internal zone (Boryslav-Pokuttya Unit), where Miocene deposits were overthrust atop the Sambir Nappe zone across a distance of some 25 km (Hryniv et al., 2007).


The Carpathian Foredeep formed during the Early Miocene, located north of emerging the Outer (Flysch) Carpathians. This basin was filled with Miocene siliciclastic deposits (clays, claystones, sandstones and conglomerates) with a maximum thickness of 3 km in Poland and up to 5 km in Ukraine (Oszczypko, 2006). Two main evaporite bearing formations characterise the saline portions of the succession and were precipitated when the hydrographic connection to the Miocene ocean was severely reduced or lost (Figures 4, 5): A) Vorotyshcha Beds, dated as Late Eggenburgian and Ottnangian, some 1.1-2.3 km thick and composed of clays with sandstones, with exploitable rocksalt and potash salt interbeds. This suite is further subdivided into two subsuites: a) A lower unit, some 100-900 m thick with rock salt beds and, b) An upper unit, some 0.7-1.0 km thick, with significant potash beds, now deformed (Hryniv et al., 2007).The Stebnyk potash mine is located in this lower subset in the Boryslav-Pokuttya Nappe region, close to the Carpathian overthrust); B) Tyras Beds of Badenian age reach thicknesses of 300-800 m in the Sambir and Bilche-Volytysa units and are dominated by salt breccias and contain both rock and potash salts. Thicknesses in the Bilche-Volytsya Unit range from 20-70 m and are made up of a combination of claystones, sandstones, carbonates, sulphates and rock salts with little or no potash.


Hence, potash salts of the Carpathian Foredeep are related either to the Vorotyshcha Beds located in the Boryslav–Pokuttya zone, or to the Tyras Beds (Badenian) in the Sambir zone (Figure 5). These associations range across different ages, but have many similar features, such as large number of potash lenses in the section, mostly in folded-thrust setting, and owing to their likely Neogene-marine mother brine contain many sulphate salts, along with a high clay content. Accordingly, the main potash ore salts are kainite, langbeinite and kainite–langbeinite mixtures. Hryniv et al. (2007) note more than 20 salt minerals in the Miocene potash levels and in their weathering products. Bromine contents in halites of the Carpathian Foredeep for deposits without potash salts range from 10 to 100 ppm (on average 56 ppm); in halite from salt breccias with potash salts range from 30 to 230 ppm (average 120 ppm); and in halite from potash beds ranges from 70 to 300 ppm (average 170 ppm). In the ore minerals from the main potash deposits, bromine content ranges are: a) in kainite 800–2300 ppm; b) in sylvite 1410–2660 ppm; and c) in carnallite 1520–2450 ppm. This is consistent with kainite being a somewhat less saline precipitate than carnallite/sylvite (Figure 6).


The brines of Vorotyshcha and Tyras salt-forming basins (based on data from brine inclusions in an investigation of sedimentary halite, listed by Hyrniv et al. (2007), are consistent with mother brines of the Na–K–Mg–Cl–SO4 (MgSO4-rich) chemical type (consistent with a Neogene marine source). Inclusion analysis indicates the temperature of halite formation in the Miocene basin brines in Forecarpathian region was around 25°C. During the potash (Kainite) stages it is likely these solutions became perennially stratified and heliothermal so that the bottom brines could be heated to 40-60°C, more than double the temperature of the brine surface layer (see Warren, 2015 for a discussion of the physical chemistry and the various brine stratification styles). During later burial and catagenesis the temperatures preserved in recrystallised halites are as high as 70°C with a clear regional tectonic distribution (Hryniv et al. (2007).

Maximum potash salt production was achieved under Soviet supervision in the 1960s, when the Stebnyk and Kalush mines delivered 150 x 106 tonnes of K2O and the “New” Stebnyk salt-works some 250 x 106 tonnes as K2SO4 per year.


Stebnyk potash (Figure 7a)

The potash salt deposit in the Stebnyk ore field occurs within the Miocene (Eggenburgian) Vorotyshcha Beds (Figures 4, 5). Salt-bearing deposits in the Stebnyk area were traditionally attributed to two main rock complexes (Lower and Upper Vorotyshcha Beds) separated by terrigenous (sandstones and conglomerates) Zahirsk Beds (Petryczenko et al., 1994). More recent work indicates that the Zahirsk Beds belonged to a olistostrome horizon (a submarine slump, interrupting evaporite deposition) and there are no valid arguments for subdividing the Vorotyshcha Beds into two subunits (Hryniv et al., 2007).

There are multiple salt-bearing series in the Stebnyk deposit (Figure 4b) and their total thickness ranges up to 2,000 m in responses to intensive fold thickening and overthrusting of the Carpathians foredeep. Intervals with more fluid salt mineralogies were compressed and squeezed into the centers of synclinal folds, to form a number of elongate lens-shape ore bodies (Figure 4b). These bodies are often several hundreds meters wide and in mineable zones occur at the depth of 80-650 m, typically at 100-360 m.

The lower part of the Vorotyshcha Suite (Beds) in the Stebnyk Mine area is composed of a salt-bearing breccia, with sylvinite or carnallitite interclayers typically in its upper parts, as well as numerous blocks of folded marly clays (Bukowski and Czapowski, 2009). Above this is the potash-bearing ore series , some 10-125 m thick and, composed of beds of kainite, langbeinite and lagbeinite-kainite with local sylvinite and kieserite (Hryniv et al., 2007). The potash interval is overlain by a rock salt complex some 60 m thick (Koriń, 1994).

The Stebnyk plant is now abandoned and in disrepair. In 1983 there was a major environmental disaster (explosion) at a nearby chemical plant (in the ammonia manufacture section), which was supplied chemical feedstock by the mine. No lives were lost, but damage at the plant, tied to the explosion, released some 4.6 million cubic metres of thick brine from an earthen storage dam into the nearby Dniester River. At the time this river was probably the least environmentally damaged by industrial operations under Soviet administration. The spill disrupted water supplies to millions of people along the river, killed hundreds of tons of fish, destroyed river vegetation and deposited a million tons of mineral salts on the bottom of a 30-mile-long reservoir on the Dniester. Stebnik is located in the Ukrainian province of Lvov. Staff members at the United States Embassy at the time seized on the name to dub the incident ‘’Lvov Canal,’’ after the Love Canal contamination in the United States.

Kalush potash salt geology (Figure 7b)

Thickness of Miocene (Badenian) deposits near the Kalush Mine is around 1 km (Figures 4a). Two local salt units (beds) are distinguished within the Tyras Beds: the Kalush and Holyn suites, which constitute the nucleus of Miocene deposits of Sambir Unit (Figure 5). Beds have been overthrust and folded onto the Mesozoic and Middle to Upper Miocene molasse sediments of the outer (Bilche-Volytsya) tectonic unit (Figure 4b). The Kalush Beds are 50-170 m thick, mostly clays, with sandstone and mudstone intercalations,. In contrast the Holyn beds are more saline and dominated by clayey rock salts (30-60% of clay), salty clays and claystones (Koriń, 1994). Repeated interbeds and concentrations of potash salts up to several meters thick within the Holyn beds define a number of separate potash salt fields in the Kalush area (Figures 4b, 5). Such salt seams are dominated by several MgSO4-enriched mineralogies: kainite, langbeinite-kainite, langbeinite, sylvinite and less much uncommon carnallite and polyhalite. These polymineralogic sulphate ore mineral assemblages are co-associated with anhydrite, kieserite and various carbonates. The potash ore fields typically occur in tectonic troughs within larger synclines, usually at depths of 100-150 m, to a maximum of 800 m.

Conventional processing streams for manufacture of SOP and MOP

To date the main natural sulphate salts that have been successfully processed to manufacture sulphate of potash (SOP) are;

  • Kainite (KCl.MgSO4.3H2O) (as in Sicily - potash mines are no longer active)
  • Kieserite (MgSO4.H2O) (as in Zechstein, Germany - some potash mines active)
  • Langbeinite (K2SO4.2MgSO4) (as in Carlsbad, New Mexico - active potash mine)
  • Polymineralic sulphate ores (as in the Stebnyk and Kalush ores, Ukraine - these potash mines are no longer active)
  • All the processing approaches deal with a mixed sulphate salt or complex sulphate brine feed and involve conversion to form an intermediate doublesalt product, usually schoenite (or leonite at elevated temperatures) or glaserite. This intermediate is then water-leached to obtain SOP.

    For example, with a kainite feed, the process involves the following reactions:

    2KCl.MgSO4.3H2O --> K2SO4.MgSO4.6H2O + MgCl2

    followed by water-leaching of the schoenite intermediate

    K2SO4.MgSO4.6H2O --> K2SO4 + MgSO4 + 6H2O


    In Sicily in the 1960s and 70s, the Italian miners utilized such a solid kainitite ore feed, from conventional underground mining and leaching approaches. The various Italian mines were heavily government subsidized and in terms of a free-standing operation most were never truly profitable. The main kainitite processing technique used in Sicily, is similar in many ways to that used to create SOP from winter-precipitated cryogenic salt slurries in pans that were purpose-constructed in the North Arm area of in Great Salt Lake, Utah (Table 1; see Warren, 2015 for details on Great Salt Lake operations). The Italian extraction method required crushing and flotation to create a fine-sized kainite ore feed with less than 5% NaCl. This product was then leached at temperatures greater than 90°C with an epsomite brine and converted into a langbeinite slurry, a portion which was then reacted with a schoenite brine to precipitate potassium chloride and epsomite solids, which were then separated from each other and from the epsomite brine. A portion of the potassium chloride was then reacted with magnesium sulphate in the presence of a sulphate brine to create schoenite and a schoenite brine. This schoenite brine was recycled and the remaining potassium chloride reacted with the schoenite in the presence of water, to obtain potassium sulphate and a sulphate brine.

    The processing stream in the Ukraine was similar for the various Carpathian ore feeds, which “out-of-mine-face” typically contained around 9% potassium and 15% clay and so were a less pure input to the processing stream, compared to the typical mine face product in Sicily. Like Sicily, schoenite was the main intermediate salt. Ore was leached with a hot synthetic kainite solution in a dissolution chamber. The langbeinite, polyhalite and halite remained undissolved in the chamber. Salts and clay were then moved into a Dorr-Oliver settler where the clays were allowed to settle and were then moved to a washer and discarded. The remaining solution was crystallized at the proper cation and anion proportions to produce crystalline schoenite. To avoid precipitation of potassium chloride and sodium chloride, a saturated solution of potassium and magnesium sulfate was added to the Dorr-Oliver settler. The resulting slurry of schoenite was filtered and crystals were leached with water to produce K2SO4 crystals, which were centrifuged and recycled and a liquor of potassium and magnesium sulfates obtained. The liquid phase from the filter was recycled and added to the schoenite liquor from obtaoned by vacuum crystallization. Part of the schoenite liquor was evaporated to produce crystalline sodium sulfate, while the magnesium chloride liquid end product was discarded. The slurry from the evaporation unit was recycled as “synthetic kainite.” This process stream permitted the use of the relatively low quality Carpathian ore and produced several commercially valuable products including potassium sulfate, potassium-magnesium sulfate, potassium chloride, sodium sulfate and magnesium chloride liquors. Being a Soviet era production site, the economics of the processing was not necessarily the main consideration. Rather, it was the agricultural utility of the product that was paramount to the Soviet state.

    Can Danakhil potash be economically mined?

    For any potash deposit (MOP or SOP) there are three approaches that are used today to economically extract ore (Warren 2015): 1) Conventional underground mining. 2) Processing of lake brines 3) Solution mining and surface processing of brines. Historically, method 1 and 2 have been successfully conducted in the Danakhil Depression, although method 1) was terminated in the Dallol area by a mine flood.

    Conventional mining

    To achieve a successful conventional underground MOP potash mine any where in the world, ideally requires (Warren, 2015): 1) A low dipping, laterally continuous and consistently predictable quality ore target, not subject to substantial changes in bed dip or continuity. 2) An ore grade of 14% K2O or higher, and bed thickness of more than 1.2 m. 3) Around 8-m of impervious salt in the mine back or roof, although some potash mines, such as the Boulby mine in the UK are working with < 2 meters of salt in the back (but there the extraction is automated and the access roads approach the target ore zone from below). 4) An initial access shaft that is vertical and typically dug using ground freezing techniques to prevent unwanted water entry during excavation. 5) A typical ore depth in the range 500-1100 metres. Shallower mines are subject to unpredictable water entry/flooding and catastrophic roof collapse, as in the Cis-Urals region (see Solikamsk blog). Mines deeper than 1000-1100 metres are at the limit of conventional mining and the salt surround is subject to substantial creep and possible explosive pressure release outbursts (as in some potash mines in the former East Germany). 6) At-surface and in-mine conditions not subject to damage by earthquakes, water floods or volcanism.

    During the feasibilty phase of the Parsons Mining Project it became evident that the halite material overlying the Sylvinite Member was porous and that there was no adequate hydrologic protection layer above the Sylvinite Member. In my mind, this is further evidence of the hydrologic access needed to convert carnallite to sylvite along the bajada front (see previous blog). In any event the absence of a hydrologic protection layer above the Sylvinite Member means that conventional underground mining is not feasible for this type of potash. In addition, given the tectonic instability of the Danakhil Depression it is likely that no underground conventional mine is feasible in the hydrologically, seismically and hydrothermally active setting, which is the Danakhil depression, even if planning to exploit the deeper widespread kainitite beds (>350-450m)

    Some explorers in the Danakhil depression, especially on the Eritrean side are proposing to use surface or open-pit mining (quarrying) approaches to reach and extract/processing shallow ore salts. For this approach to be successful requires the shallow potash targets to be above regional groundwater level. Depths to the different ore targets on the Ethiopian side of the depression range between 45m and 600m and almost all lie below the regional water. Also, to access the mineralised material a large volume of variably water-saturated overburden would need to be removed. Even if areas with ore levels above the water table do exist on the Ethiopian side, the whole of the Danakhil sump is subject to periodic runoff and sheetflooding, sourced in the western highlands. Open pit areas would be regularly flooded during the lifetime of the pit, resulting in a need for extensive dewatering. For these reasons, and the possibility of earthquake damage, open pit mining is likely not feasible.

    Can the Danakhil potash be solution mined?

    To achieve this, brines extracted from different mineralogical levels and ore types will need to be individually targeted and kept as separate feeds into dedicated at-surface processing streams. On the Dallol surface, there are numerous sites that are suitable for pan construction, the climate is suitable for natural solar concentration as the region is typically dry, flat and hyperarid. If the potash zones in the Dallol depression are to be economically exploited via solution mining it will likely first require an understanding of the geometries of the 3 different forms of potash, namely; 1) Bedded kainitite-carnallitite (widespread in the depression), 2) Diagenetic sylvite via incongruent dissolution (focused by deep meteoric mixing and the bajada chemical interface along the western margin. 3) Hydrothermal potash (largely found in the vicinity of Dallol mound). Next, in order to have known-chemistry feedstocks into a SOP chemical plant, it will require the appropriate application of extraction/solution mining chemistries for each of these deposit styles. This would involve the construction of dedicated brine fields and the pumping of shallow Dallol brines (mostly from <200-250m below the surface) into a series of mineralogically-separated at-surface solar concentrator pans. 

    There are some subsurface aspects that need to be considered and controlled  in a solution mining approach in the Danakhil. The first is the possibility of uncontrolled solution cavity stoping (for example where a solution cavity blanket layer is lost due to cavity intersection with an unexpected zone of high permeability). If cavity shape is not closely monitored (for example by regular downhole sonar scans) and controlled, this could ultimately lead to the collapse of the land surface atop regions of shallow evaporites (<150-200 below the surface). As we saw in blog 3, doline collapse is a natural process in the Dallol Mound region, as it is any region of shallow soluble evaporites in contact with undersaturated pore waters. Ongoing solution via interaction with hydrothermal waters has created the colorful brine springs that attract tourists to the Dallol Mound region. But a operator does not want new dolines to daylight in their brine field, as environmental advocates would quickly lay blame at the feet of the brinefield operator. For this reason, the region in the vicinity of the Dallol Mount (eg the “Crescent deposit”) should probably be avoided.

    Most modern brinefield operators prefer a slowly-dissolving targeted salt bed that is at least 400-500m below the land surface (Warren, 2015). This broadens and lessens the intensity of the cone of ground collapse above the extraction zone and so lessens the possibility of catastrophic surface collapse. Use of a diesel rather than air blanket during cavity operation is also preferred because of potential porosity intersections at the base of the Upper Rock Salt (URF) contact (see blog 2 in the Danakhil blogs) Appropriate deeper potash beds in the Danakhil are laterally continuous beds of kainitite with lesser carnallitite. Drilling to date has identified little sylvite or bischofite in these widespread layers. This simplifies the mineral input chemistry in terms of a kainite target further out in the saltflat with a sylvite or sylvite bischofite operation closer toward the western margin, but there are no currently active solution mines solely targeting a kainite ore anywhere in the world.

    This leads to another consideration with a solution mining approach in the Danakhil depression, and that is that there are no existing brine technologies that can deal economically with high concurrent levels of magnesium and possibly-elevated sulphate levels in a recovered brine feed. The third consideration is reliably predicting the occurrence of, and avoiding, any metre- to decametre-scale brine-filled cavities that the drilling has shown are not uncommon at the sylvinite-bischofite-carnallite level in the Dallol stratigraphy along the Bajada chemistry zone. Intersecting and slowly dewatering such large brine cavities may not lead to at-surface ground collapse, but if not identified could create unexpected variations in the ionic proportions of brine feeds into the solar concentrators (for example drilling has identified subsurface regions dominated by bischofite, which is one of the most soluble bittern salts in the Danakhil depression - see Ercospan 2010, 2011 for drill result summaries).

    And so?

    So, at this stage, there are encouraging possibilities for economic recovery of both MOP and SOP from solution brines pumped to chemistry-specific solar pans in the Danakhil. Processing chemistry will require further site-specific studies to see which of the current known methods or their modification is economically feasible for SOP and perhaps combined SOP and MOP manufacture in the hyperarid climate of the Danakhil, as is being currently done by Allana Potash. It is also possible that a new processing stream chemistry could to be developed for the Dallol brines, in order to deal with very high concurrent levels of MgCl2 (widespread bischofite beds), or develop new or modify existing processing streams that target kainitite at depth. Similar K2SO4 brine processing chemistries have been applied in pans of the margins of the Great Salt Lake. But there salt pan processing was in part seasonally cryogenic, something that the Dallol climate certainly is not, so it is likely modified or new approaches to year-round pan management will be required.

    Any future potash operation in the Danakil will have to compete in product pricing with well established, high-volume low cost producers in Canada, Belarus and Russia (Figure 8). Today, establishing a new conventional underground potash mine is associated with setup costs well in excess of a billion dollars (US$). The costs are high as the entry shaft to a conventional underground mine must be completed without water entry and is usually done via ground freezing. This is the approach currently underway at BHP’s MOP Jansen Mine in Saskatchewan, Canada. Because of the very high costs involved in underground entry construction, and the well established nature of the competition, the proved amount of ore for a conventional mine should be sufficient for at least 20 years of production (subject to a given mill size, mill recovery rate for a given ore depth and the density and origin of salt “horses”). Kogel et al. (2006) states any potash plant or mill should be at capable of least 300,000 t K2O per annum in order to compete with a number of established plants with nameplate capacity in excess of 1 Mt.

    In contrast, the shallow nature of a Danakhil potash source means cheaper access costs, while a solution well approach makes for much cheaper and shorter approach times for brine/ore extraction, providing suitable economic brine processing streams are available (Figure 8). Potash is a mine product where transport to market is a very considerable cost proportion in terms of an operation's profitability. The location of the Danakhil gives it a low-cost transport advantage as a future supplier to the ever-growing agricultural markets of Africa, India and perhaps China. And finally, a potassium sulphate product has a 30% cost premium over a muriate of potash (KCl) product.

    References

    Bukowski, K., and G. Czapowski, 2009, Salt geology and mining traditions: Kalush and Stebnyk mines (Fore-Carpathian region, Ukraine): Geoturystyka, v. 3, p. 27-34.

    Czapowski, G., K. Bukowski, and K. Poborska-Młynarska, 2009, Miocene rock and potash salts of West Ukraine. y): Field geological-mining seminar of the Polish Salt Mining Society. Geologia (Przegląd Solny 2009), Wyd. AGH, Kraków, 35, 3: 479-490. (In Polish, English summary).

    Decima, A., J. A. McKenzie, and B. C. Schreiber, 1988, The origin of "evaporative" limestones: An Example from the Messinian of Sicily: Journal of Sedimentary Petrology, v. 58, p. 256-272.

    Decima, A., and F. Wezel, 1973, Late Miocene evaporites of the central Sicilian Basin; Italy: Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project, v. 13, p. 1234-1240.

    Decima, A., and F. C. Wezel, 1971, Osservazioni sulle evaporiti messiniane della Sicilia centromeridionale: Rivista Mineraria Siciliana, v. 130–132, p. 172–187.

    Garcia-Veigas, J., F. Orti, L. Rosell, C. Ayora, R. J. M., and S. Lugli, 1995, The Messinian salt of the Mediterranean: geochemical study of the salt from the central Sicily Basin and comparison with the Lorca Basin (Spain): Bulletin de la Societe Geologique de France, v. 166, p. 699-710.

    Garrett, D. E., 1995, Potash: Deposits, processing, properties and uses: Berlin, Springer, 752 p.

    Hite, R. J., and A. S. Wassef, 1983, Potential Potash Deposits in the Gulf of Suez, Egypt: Ann. Geol. Survey Egypt, v. 13, p. 39-54.

    Hryniv, S. P., B. V. Dolishniy, O. V. Khmelevska, A. V. Poberezhskyy, and S. V. Vovnyuk, 2007, Evaporites of Ukraine: a review: Geological Society, London, Special Publications, v. 285, p. 309-334.

    Koriń, S. S., 1994, Geological outline of Miocene salt-bearing formations of the Ukrainian fore-Carpathian area (In Polish, English summary): Przegląd Geologiczny, v. 42, p. 744-747.

    Lowenstein, T. K., L. A. Hardie, M. N. Timofeeff, and R. V. Demicco, 2003, Secular variation in seawater chemistry and the origin of calcium chloride basinal brines: Geology, v. 31, p. 857-860.

    Lowenstein, T. K., M. N. Timofeeff, S. T. Brennan, H. L. A., and R. V. Demicco, 2001, Oscillations in Phanerozoic seawater chemistry: Evidence from fluid inclusions: Science, v. 294, p. 1086-1088.

    Lugli, S., 1999, Geology of the Realmonte salt deposit, a desiccated Messinian Basin (Agrigento, Sicily): Memorie della Societá Geologica Italiana, v. 54, p. 75-81.

    Lugli, S., and T. K. Lowenstein, 1997, Paleotemperatures preserved in fluid inclusions in Messinian halite, Realmonte Mine (Agrigento, Italy): Neogene Mediterranean Paleoceanography, 28–30 September 1997, Erice. Abstract volume, 44–45.

    Lugli, S., B. C. Schreiber, and B. Triberti, 1999, Giant polygons in the Realmonte mine (Agrigento, Sicily): Evidence for the desiccation of a Messinian halite basin: Journal of Sedimentary Research Section A-Sedimentary Petrology & Processes, v. 69, p. 764-771.

    Manzi, V., S. Lugli, M. Roveri, B. C. Schreiber, and R. Gennari, 2011, The Messinian "Calcare di Base" (Sicily, Italy) revisited: Geological Society of America Bulletin, v. 123, p. 347-370.

    Notholt, A. J. G., 1983, Potash in Developing Countries, in R. M. McKercher, ed., Potash '83; Potash technology; mining, processing, maintenance, transportation, occupational health and safety, environment, p. 29-40.

    Oszczypko, N., P. Krzywiec, I. Popadyuk, and T. Peryt, 2006, Carpathian Foredeep Basin (Poland and Ukraine): Its Sedimentary, Structural, and Geodynamic Evolution, in J. Golonka, and F. J. Picha, eds., The Carpathians and their foreland: Geology and hydrocarbon resources, The American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, v. 84, p. 293-350.

    Petryczenko, O. I., G. M. Panow, T. M. Peryt, B. I. Srebrodolski, A. W. Pobereżski, and K. W.M., 1994, Outline of geology of the Miocene evaporite formations of the Ukrainian part of the Carpathian Foredeep (In Polish, English summary): Przegląd Geologiczny, v. 42, p. 734-737.

    Roveri, M., S. Lugli, V. Manzi, and B. C. Schreiber, 2008, The Messinian Sicilian stratigraphy revisited: new insights for the Messinian salinity crisis: Terra Nova, v. 20, p. 483-488.

    Warren, J. K., 2015, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3) Released August 2015: Berlin, Springer, 1600 p.

    Danakhil Potash, Ethiopia: Beds of Kainite/Carnallite, Part 2 of 4

    John Warren - Wednesday, April 29, 2015

    The modern Dallol saltflat described in the previous blog defines the upper part of more than 970 metres of halite-dominated Quaternary evaporites that have accumulated beneath the present salt pan of the Northern Danakhil. The total sequence is made up of interbeds of halite, gypsum, anhydrite and shale with a potash succession separating two thick sequences of halite (Figure 1; Holwerda and Hutchison, 1968; Augustithis, 1980). At depths of more than 35-40 meters, and deepening to the east, this km-thick subcropping Quaternary halite-dominated fill contains one, and perhaps two or more, potash beds. For a more detailed description of the upper part of the fill the reader is referred to the previous blog and Chapter 11 in Warren, 2015.


    Bedded Pleistocene evaporites may underlie the entire Danakil depression, but younger lava flows of the Aden Volcanic Series and alluvium washed in from the surrounding bajada obscure much of the older Pleistocene sedimentary series across much of the southern part of the depression beyond Lake Assale). Potash exploration drilling and core recovery is concentrated in the accessible parts of the northern Danakhil rift, where the saltflat facilitates vehicle access, compared with the lava-covered regions south of Lake Assale. The most recent volcanic activity affecting the known potash region was the emplacement of the Dallol Mound, which has driven local uplift of the otherwise subsurface potash section to where it approaches the surface in the immediate vicinity of the mound (Figure 2a).

    Away from the Dallol volcanic mound the upper potash bed beneath the saltflat lies at a depth of 38-190 metres. A lower inferred potash bed likely occurs at depth along the eastern end of the saltflat, but this second bed is inferred from high API kicks in gamma logs run in deeper wells, no solid salt was recovered (Holwerda and Hutchison, 1968). The upper proven potash bed is now the target zone for a number of minerals companies currently exploring for potash in the region. Regionally, both potash units dip east, with the deepest indicators of the two units encountered by the drill in a single well on the eastern side of the saltflat at depths of 683 and 930 m, respectively (Figure 2: Holwerda and Hutchison, 1968). The likely Quaternary age of the potash units, the marine brine source, explains the high magnesium content of the potash bittern salts, as modern seawater contains high levels of Mg and SO4.


    My study of core that intersected the potash interval and that is sandwiched between the Lower and Upper Halite units shows both the lower and the upper halite units retain pristine sedimentary textures, with features and vertical successions that indicate distinct hydrologies during their deposition (Figure 3). There is no textural evidence of halokinetic recrystallization in halites any of the studied cores and published seismic also indicates consistent dips in the evaporites . Most of the textures in the cored potash interval indicate a subaqueous density-stratified environment, with brine reworking of the upper part of primary kainitite, carnallitite units. Perennial subaqueous, density-stratified brines also typify the hydrology of the Lower Halite unit, albeit with somewhat lower salinities tan those precipitating the bitterns (Figure 3). The brine that precipitating the Upper Rocksalt Formation was shallower and more ephemeral. The following paragraphs summarise my core-based observations and interpretations that led to this interpretation of the evolving brine hydrology.

    The Lower Rocksalt Formation (LRF) is dominated by bottom-growth-aligned subaqueous halite textures and lack of siliciclastic detritus, unlike the Upper Rocksalt Formation (Figure 3). Halite textures in the LRF lack porosity and dominated by coarsely crystalline beds made up of cm-scale NaCl-CaSO4 couplets dominated by upward-pointing halite chevrons and mantled by thin CaSO4 layers (Figure 3). This meromictic-holomictic textural association passes up into the upper part of the LRF with cm-scale proportions alternating of less-saline to more-saline episodes of evaporite precipitation decreasing, indicating an “on-average” increasingly shallow subaqueous depositional setting as one approaches the base of the kainitite unit. The combination of bottom-nucleated and cumulate textures in the LRF are near identical to those in the halites in the kainitite interval in the Messinian of Sicily (see later). 

    The laminated Kainitite Member is also a subaqueous unit with layered cumulate textures (Figure 3), it was likely deposited on a pelagic bottom beneath a shallow body of marine-fed bittern waters, which never reached carnallite saturation. Above this are the variably present carnallitic Intermediate and Sylvinitite members and the overlying Halite marker beds in turn overlain by the Upper Halite unit. All retain pristine textures indicating mostly subaqueous deposition, soon followed by varying exposure and reaction with shallow phreatic brines moving across the top of Kainitite member. This shallow phreatic brine crossflow drove syndepositional mineral alteration and collapse in the upper part of the kainitite and carnallitite units.


    The potash-entraining interval between the URF and LRF is called the Houston Formation has been drilled and cored extensively by explorers in the basin, showing it is consistently between 15 and 40 metres thick (Figure 1). Stratigraphically, it consists of lower Kainitite Member (4-14m thick) atop and in depositional continuity with the LRF (more than 500m thick) (Figure 3). The Kainitite Member is fine-grained, laminated, locally wavy-bedded, containing up to 50% kainite cumulates in a cumulate (non-chevron) halite background, along with small amounts of a white mineral that is likely epsomite. It is overlain by what older literature describes as the “Carnallitite Intermediate unit” (3-25 m thick). More recent potash exploration drilling has shown all the members that constitute the Intermediate Carnallitite Member is not always present within the Dallol depression. Mineralogically is at best considered as variably developed (Figure 3). Its lower part is a layered to laminated carnallite-halite mixture with some kieserite, anhydrite and epsomite. This can pass up or laterally into kainitite with sylvite. Above the Intermediate Member is the 0-10m thick Sylvinite Member containing 20-30% sylvite, along with polyhalite and anhydrite (up to 10%). Typically the sylvinite member shows primary layering disturbed by varying intensities of slumping and dissolution. Often the upper part of a carnallite unit (where present) also shows similar evidence of dissolution and reprecipitation.

    Cores through the sylvinite member and parts of the upper carnallitite member sample a range of recrystallization/flow/slump textures, rather than primary horizontal-laminar textures. Beneath the sylvinite member, the variably-present upper carnallitite member contains a varied suite of non-commercial potash minerals that in addition to carnallite include, kieserite, kainite (up to 10% by volume) and polyhalite, along with minor amounts of sylvite. Minor anhydrite is common, while rinneite may occur locally, along with rust-red iron staining. Sylvite is more abundant near the top of the carnallitite member and its proportion decreases downward, perhaps reflecting its groundwater origin. Kainite is the reverse and its proportion increases downward. The sylvinite member and the carnallitite member also show an inverse thickness relationship. Bedding in the carnallitite member is commonly contorted with folded and brecciated horizons interpreted as slumps. The base of the carnallitite member is defined as the level where carnallite forms isolated patches in the kainite before disappearing entirely.

    Drilling in the past few years has clearly show that in some parts of the evaporite unit, located nearer to the western side of the basin, the lower and upper carnallite units are separated by thick bischoftite intervals (Figures 2b, 3). The bischofite is layered at a mm-cm scale and with no obvious breaks related to freshening and exposure, implying it too was deposited in a perennially subaqueous or phreatic cavity setting (Pedley et al., in press).

    The potash/bischofite interval passes up into a slumped and disturbed halite-dominated unit that is known as the “Marker Beds” because of the co-associated presence of clay lamina and bedded halite, along with traces of potash minerals (Figure 3). This unit then passes up into the massive Upper Rock Salt unit across an unconformity at the top of the halite “Marker Beds.” Bedded, and at times finely laminated cumulate textures in the various magnesian bittern units, are used by many to argue that the kainitite and the lower carnallitite members are primary or syndepositional precipitates.

    Three types of potash-barren zones can occur within it and are possibly related to the effects of groundwaters and solution cavity cements within the carnallitite unit, perhaps precipitated before the deposition of the overlying marker halites. Barren zones in the Sylvinite member are regions where: a) the entire sylvinite bed is replaced by a relatively pure stratiform halite, along with dispersed nodules of anhydrite, b) zones up to 23 m thick and composed of pure crystalline halite (karst-fill cements?) that occur patchily within the sylvinite bed and, c) potash-depleted zones defined by coarsely crystalline halite instead of sylvinite. Bedding plane spacing and layering and some slumping styles in the halite in styles a and b are similar to that in the sylvite bed. Contact with throughflushing freshened nearsurface and at-surface waters perhaps created most of the barren zones in the sylvinite. Fluid crossflow may also have formed or reprecipitated sylvite of the upper member, via selective surface or nearsurface leaching of MgCl2 from its carnallite precursor (Holwerda and Hutchison, 1968; Warren 2015). Due to the secondary origin of much of the sylvite in the Sylvinite member, the proportion of sylvite decreases as the proportion of carnallite increases, along with secondary kieserite, polyhalite and kainite.

    The kainite member is texturally distinctive and is composed of nearly pure, fine-grained, dense, relatively hard, amber-coloured kainite with ≈ 25% admixed halite (Figure 3). Core study shows the lamina style remained flat-laminar (that is, subaqueous density-stratified with periodic bottom freshening) as the mineralogy passes from the LRF up into the flat-laminated kainitite member (Figure 4: Warren, 2015; Pedley et al., in press). Throughout, the kainitite unit shows a cm-mm scale layering, with no evidence of microkarsting or any exposure of the kainitite depositional surface. That is, the Kainitite Member is a primary depositional unit, like the underlying halite and still retains pristine evidence of its dominantly subaqueous depositional hydrology. The decreased proportion of anhydrite in the Kainitite Member, compared to the underlying LRF, indicates a system that on-average was more saline than the brines that deposited the underlying halite. The preponderance of MgSO4 salts means the Kainitite unit like the underlying LRF formed by the evaporation of seep-supplied seawater.

    This situation differs from the present “closed basin” hydrology of the Danakil Depression which typifies the URF and the overlying Holocene succession (Hardie, 1990; Warren, 2015).

    Units atop the primary laminated textures of the kainitite, lower carnallitite and bischofite members (where present) tend to show various early-diagenetic secondary textures (Figure 4). It seems much of the sylvinite and upper carnallitite member deposition was in shallow subsurface or at-surface brine ponds subject to groundwater crossflows and floor collapse, possibly aided by seismically-induced pulses of brine crossflow. In addition, this perennial density-stratified brine hydrology was at times of holomixis subject to brine reflux and the brine-displacement backreactions that typify all evaporite deposition, past and present (Warren 2015).

    The observation of early ionic mobility in potash zone brines in the Danakil depositional system is also not unusual in any modern or ancient potash deposit. It should not be considered necessarily detrimental to the possibility of an extensive economically exploitable potash zone being present in the Danakil Depression. Interestingly, all the world’s exploited potash deposits, including those in the Devonian of Canada and Belarus, the Perm of the Urals and the potash bed of west Texas, show evidence of syndepositional and shallow burial reworking of potash (Warren, 2015). Early potassium remobilization has created the ore distributions in these and other mined potash depositsTextures and mineralogies in the Upper Rocksalt Formation (URF) define a separate hydrological association to the marine-fed LRF and Houston Formation (Table 4). Compared to the LRF, the URF has much higher levels of depositional porosity, lacks high levels of CaSO4, and has high levels of detrital siliciclastics. This is especially so in its upper part, which shows textural evidence of periodic and ongoing clastic-rich sheetflooding and freshening (Figure 4). It was deposited in a hydrology that evolved up section to become very similar to that active on today’s halite pan surface. The URF contains no evidence of salinities or textures associated with a potash bittern event and is probably not a viable exploration target for solid potash salts.

    Above the URF is a clastic unit with significant amounts of, and sometimes beds dominated by, lenticular gypsum and displacive halite. The unit thickens toward the margins of the depression (Figure 2). The widespread presence of diagenetic salts indicates high pore salinities as, or soon after, the saline beds that stack into the clastic unit were deposited. Some of these early diagenetic evaporite textures are spectacular, as seen in the displacive halite recovered in a core from the lower portion of the clastic overburden, some 45 m below the modern pan surface (Figure 3).

    What is clear from the textures preserved in the potash-rich Houston formation and the immediately underlying and overlying halites is that they first formed in a subaqueous-dominated marine-fed hydrology (Figure 4), which evolves up section into more ephemeral saltpan hydrologies of today (see the previous blog). The potash interval encapsulated in the Houston formation has primary mineralogical associations that are derived by evaporation of Pleistocene seawater (kainitite, carnallitite). In contrast the sylvite section in the Houston tends to form when these primary mineralogies are altered diagenetically perhaps soon after deposition but, especially, when hydrothermal waters circulated through uplifted beds of the Houston Formation, as is still occurring in the vicinity of the Dallol Volcanic Mound. Or where the chemical/meteoric interface associated with the encroachment of the bajada sediment pile drove incongruent dissolution of carnallite along the updip edge of the Houston Fm (as we shall discuss in the next blog). 

    References

    Augustithis, S. S., 1980, On the textures and treatment of the sylvinite ore from the Danakili Depression, Salt Plain (Piano del Sale), Tigre, Ethiopia: Chemie der Erde, v. 39, p. 91-95.

    Hardie, L. A., 1990, The roles of rifting and hydrothermal CaCl2 brines in the origin of potash evaporites: an hypothesis: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 43-106.

    Holwerda, J. G., and R. W. Hutchinson, 1968, Potash-bearing evaporites in the Danakil area, Ethiopia: Economic Geology, v. 63, p. 124-150.

    Pedley, H. M., J. Neubert, and J. K. Warren, in press, Potash deposits of Africa: African Mineral Deposits, 35TH International Geological Congress (IGC), Capetown (28 August to 4 September 2016).

    Warren, J. K., 2015, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3) Released August 2015: Berlin, Springer, 1600 p. 

    Danakhil Potash, Ethiopia: Is the present geology the key? Part 1 of 4

    John Warren - Sunday, April 19, 2015

    Geology of potash in the Danakil Depression, Ethiopia: Is the present the key?

    The Danakhil region, especially in the Dallol region of Ethiopia, is world renowned for significant accumulations of potash salts (both muriates and sulphates), and is often cited as a modern example of where potash accumulates today. What is not so well known are the depositional and hydrological dichotomies that control levels of bittern salts in the Pleistocene stratigraphy that is the Danakhil fill. Geological evolution of the potash occurrences in the Dallol saltflat and surrounds highlights the limited significance of Holocene models for potash, when compared to the broader depositional and hydrological spectra preserved in ancient (Pre-Quaternary) evaporite deposits (see Warren, 2010, 2015 for a more complete analysis across a variety of evaporite salts).

    Across the next four blogs, I shall discuss the geological character of the Danakhil fill and the controls on potash in the depression via four time-related discussions; A) Current continental fan - saltflat hydrology that typifies present and immediate past deposition in the depression (Danakhil Blog1). B) A time in the latest Pleistocene when there was a marine hydrographic connection exemplified by a healthy coralgal rim facies (probably ≈ 100,000 years ago, and a subsequent drawndown gypsum rim facies. Both units are discussed in this blog, (Danakhil Blog1), and C) a somewhat older Pleistocene period when widespread potash salts were deposited via a marine seepage fed hydrology (Danakhil Blog2). Then, within this depositional frame, we will consider D) the influence of Holocene volcanism and uplift driving remobilisation of the somewhat older potash-rich evaporite source beds into the Holocene hydrology (Danakhil Blog3) and finally how this relates to models of Neogene marine potash deposition (Danakhil Blog4). These observations and interpretations are based in large part on a two-week visit to the Dallol, sponsored by BHP minerals, and focused on the potash geology of the region. 

    Dallol Physiography

    The Danakhil Depression of Ethiopia and Eritrea is an area of intense volcanic and hydrothermal activity, with potash occurrences related to rift magmatism, marine flooding, and deep brine cycling. The region is part of the broader Afar Triple Junction and located in the axial zone of the Afar rift, near the confluence of the East African, Red Sea and Carlsberg rifts (Figure 1a; Holwerda and Hutchison, 1968; Hutchinson and Engels, 1970; Hardie, 1990). The depression defines the northern part of the Afar depression and runs SSE parallel to the Red Sea coast, but lies some 50 to 80 km inland, and is separated from the Red Sea by the Danakil Mountains. The fault-defined Danakil Depression is 185 km long, up to 70 km wide, with a floor that in the deeper parts of the depression is more than 116 meters below sea level. It widens to the south, beginning with a 10 km width in the north and widening up to 70 km in the south (Figure 1a). In the vicinity of Lake Assele, the northern portion of the Danakil is known as the Dallol Depression and has been the focus for potash exploration for more than a century and is in the deepest region of the depression with elevations ranging between 50m to 120m below sealevel (Figure 1b, c). Shallow volcano-tectonic barriers, behind Mersa Fatma, Hawakil Bay and south of the Gulf of Zula, prevent hydrographic (surface) recharge to the depression. Marine seepage is not occurring at the present time, but likely did so at the time the main potash unit was precipitated. Lake Assele (aka Lake Kurum) with a water surface at -115m msl should not be confused with Lake Asal (-155 msl), located 350 km to the southeast of the Danakil. Asal an active marine-fed hydrographically isolated lacustrine drawdown system, which today is depositing a combination of pan halite and subaqueous gypsum in the deepest part of the Asal-Ghubbat al Kharab rift (Figure 1a; Warren, 2015).

    Today the halite-floored elongate saltpan, known as the Dallol saltflat, occupies the deepest part of the northern Danakil Depression, extending over an area some 40 km long and 10 km wide (Figure 1b, c). The pan’s position is asymmetric within the Danakil Depression; it lies near the depression’s western edge, some 5km from the foot of the escarpment to the Balakia Mountains and the Ethiopian Highlands, but some 50 km from the eastern margin of the depression, which is in Eritrea. The Dallol saltpan and adjacent Lake Assele today constitute the deepest continental drainage sump in the Afar depression (Figure 1b, c). The area, located east and northeast of the main modern Dallol saltpan depression, is mostly an extensive gypsum plain (Bannert et al., 1970). As we shall see, the gypsum pavement, and its narrower equivalents on the western basin flank, defines a somewhat topographically higher (still sub-sealevel) less-saline, lacustrine episode in the Dallol depression history fill. To the south of the Dallol salt pan, bedded Pleistocene evaporites may underlie the entire Danakil depression, but younger lava flows of the Aden Volcanic Series in combination with alluvium washed in from the surrounding bajada obscure much of the older Pleistocene sedimentary series in southern part of the depression beyond Lake Assele (Figures 1a).

    Climate

    In terms of daily and monthly temperatures, the Dallol region currently holds the official record for highest average, year-round, monthly temperatures; in winter the daily temperature on the saltflat is consistently above 34°C and in summer every day tops 40°C, with some days topping 50°C (Figure 2; Oliver, 2005). These high temperatures and a lack of rainfall, typically less than 200 mm each year, place the Dallol at the hyperarid end of the world desert spectrum and so it lies at the more arid end of the BWh Köppen climate zone (Kottek et al., 2006; Warren, 2015).


    History of extraction of salt products and their transport (Table 1)

    Using little-changed extraction and transport methods, salt (halite) has been quarried by local Afar tribesmen for hundreds of years. First, using axes, a crust of pan salt is chopped into large slabs (Figure 3a). Then workers fit a set of sticks into grooves made by the axes. Next, working the stick, workers lever slabs of bedded salt, which is cut into rectangular tiles of standard size and weight, called ganfur (about 4kg) or ghelao (about 8kg). Tiles are stacked, tied and prepared for transport out of the depression on the backs of camels and donkeys (Figure 3b). Around 2,000 camels and 1,000 donkeys come to the salt flat every day to transport salt tiles to Berahile, about 75 km away. Previously, salt tiles were carried via camel train to the city of Mekele, some 100 km from the Danakil. Mekele, located in the Ethiopian highlands is known as the hub of Ethiopia’s former “white gold” salt trade and still today is known as the “old” salt caravan city. Today, the salt caravans walk the extracted salt to Berahile, located some 60 km from Mekele. From there, trucks transport the salt to Mekele. Each truck can transport up to 350 camel salt loads. From the Mekele salt market, Dallol salt blocks are transported and sold to all parts of Ethiopia for use mainly as table salt or as an add-on in animal feed. The lifestyle of the miners and the camel trains is likely to change in the next few decades as sealed roads are now under construction that will link Mekele to Dallol.


    Once potash (sylvite and carnallite) was discovered in the Dallol region in 1906, an Italian company by the name of Compagnia Mineraria Coloniale (CMC) established the first mining operation. In 1918 a railway was completed from the port of Mersa Fatma to a termination some 28 km from Dallol (Table 1). Rail construction took place from 1917-1918, using what was then the British and French “military-standard” 600 mm rail-gauge Decauville system. "Decauville" rail construction used ready-made sections of small-gauge track and so the trackway was rapidly assembled; <2 years to complete more than 50 km of track. Once completed, the railway transported extracted potash salt from the "Iron Point" rail terminal near Dallol, via Kululli to the port. Potash production is said to have reached some 50,000 metric tons in the 1920s, extracted from an area centred on the Crescent Deposit, which is located near the foot of uplifted lake beds on the southern flanks of Mt Dallol. However, significant salt production had ceased by the end of the 1920s, as large-scale mines in Germany, the USA, and the USSR began to supply the world market with cheaper product. Unsuccessful attempts to reopen potash production were made in the period 1920-1941. Between 1925-29 some 25,000 tons of sylvite were shipped by rail from the Dallol, with a product that averaged 70% KCl. After World War II, the British administration dismantled the railway and removed all traces of it. In 1951-1953, the Dallol Co. of Asmara sold a few tons of product from the Dallol.


    The potash concession title was transferred to the American “Ralph M. Parsons Company” (Parsons) at the end of the 1950s. Parsons initiated the first systematic exploration for potash in the Danakil depression and drilled more than 250 exploration holes during their 9-year evaluation campaign. Major potash resources were confirmed a few km west of Mount Dallol, in a mineralized zone that was named the “Musley” Deposit. Following on from positive exploration results, they began an engineering study to investigate potential processing and mining methods for the Musley Deposit and subsequently in October 1965 sank a shaft into the orebody. They installed underground mine facilities and established a pilot processing plant on surface, to investigate recovery from the bulk samples collected from the underground workings. They envisaged developing the Musley Deposit as a conventional room-and-pillar operation and to this end developed six underground drifts totalling some 805 m in length. Unconfirmed reports suggest that an influx of water flooded the mine (possibly triggered by a seismic event) and after failed attempts to solve the water problem, the activities Parsons ceased activities in 1968. As of end 2014, some salt block buildings built by the Italian and other companies still partially stand as ruins, along with rusting equipment.

    Based on the previous work conducted by Parsons, a German potash producer, Salzdetfurth AG (SAG), began a new exploration campaign in the Danakil Depression in 1968 and 1969. In addition to their work in the Dallol depression, SAG drilled a number of wells in a concession south of Lake Assale, and conducted a geological mapping campaign as far north as Lake Badda, on the border with Eritrea. SAG’s exploration work away from the known Dallol deposits did not prove fruitful as they drilled only one drill hole that reached the potash level. This drill hole, located approximately 25 km to the southeast of Mount Dallol, intersected a kainitite bed, with no sylvinite intersection. The SAG concession was returned to state authorities of Ethiopia. Subsequent drilling by other explorationists in this region has confirmed the deepening of the kainitite level to the southeast of Dallol and the lack of sylvinite at greater depths.

    Since the dismantling of the railway, there has been no high-volume transport system to carry potash product the Red Sea coast. Currently, the Ethiopian Government is constructing all-weather roads from Dallol to Mekele and Afdera When complete this road system will facilitate transport of future potential potash product from the Dallol to Afdera, from where existing roads provide access to Serdo and from there to the seaport of Tadjoura in Djibouti (Figure 1a). This section requires an addition 30 km of all-weather road to be completed to the coast and will facilitate cost-effective transport of potash product to the large agricultural markets of India and China. The transport distance to the Eritrean coast from Dallol is much shorter, but political considerations mean such a route is not a viable option at the present time.

    EVAPORITE DEPOSITIONAL PATTERNS IN OUTCROP

    Surficial sediment distributions outline classic drawdown facies belts in the Dallol region, with a wadi-fed alluvial fan fringe passing down dip into sandflats (local dune fields), dry mudflats (with springs), saline mudflats and ephemeral to perennial brine pans of Lake Assele (Figure 1b). The fans, especially along the western margin of the depression are indented or locally covered by a mostly younger succession of constant-elevation marine, biochemical and evaporitic sediments fringes or “bathtub rim” facies (Figure 4).

     

    Alluvial Fan fringe (Bajada) 

    Pleistocene alluvial/fluvial beds, exposed by local uplift, deflation and ongoing watertable lowering, outcrop about updip edges to the salt-crusted parts of the northern Danakil, and form low flat-topped plateaus or mesas on the plain. These mesas define the tops of alluvial fans aprons, which are heavily dissected and eroded by occasional storm runoff and rainfall. This fan fringe contains relatively fresh water lenses in a desert setting that is one of the world’s harshest (Kebede, 2012). Most of the depositionally active fans line the western margin of the basin and many of the downdip fan edges occur slightly up dip a still-exposed gypsum pavement (Figure 5a), showing depositional equilibration largely with an earlier higher lake stage, while others, such as the Musley fan, have flowed across cut into the gypsum pavement level and now feed water and sediment directly into the edges of the saltflat that defines the lower parts of the depression (Figure 4). Watercourses of the fans that have dissected earlier wadi (bajada) deposits as well as the earlier lacustrine gypsum and limestone pavements so create excellent windows into the stratigraphy of these units. Fan avulsion is indicated by palaeosol layers exposed by downcutting of younger streams (Figure 5b, c).

     

    The Musley fan characteristics are well documented by current and previous potash explorers in the basin as these permeable gravels and sands store a reliable water source for potential solution mining/ore processing in the Musley area and so has been cored by a number of proposed water wells. Internally, the fan is composed of interfingering layers and lenses of sand, gravel and clay (paleosols), with highly porous intervals in the sand and gravels (Figure 5b, c). Depth to the watertable varies from >2m to 60m, and salinities from 760 ppm to more than 23,400 ppm. The principal source of recharge is flash flooding, originating in Musley Canyon, which drains the Western Escarpment, along with minor inflows from the adjacent uplifted volcanic block and local highly intermittent rains (Figure 1a). Of six potential water wells drilled in the fan by the Ralph M. Parsons Company in the 1960s, four returned water of good quality (<2000 mg/l), while the other two had waters with salinities in excess of 20 g/l. Pumping test data indicate average transmissivity of the water-bearing beds around 870m2/day, with salinities in the fan increasing from west to east, approaching the saltflat.

    Chemical sediments outcropping in the depression

    Overall, surface sediment patterns in the Danakil depression define a depositional framework of brine drawdown, related to basin isolation from an earlier hydrographic (at surface) marine connection to the Red Sea, followed by stepped evaporative drawdown. This is indicated by fringing topographically-distinct belts or rims of now inactive coralgal carbonates and gypsum evaporites (aka “bathtub ring” patterns) that cover earlier Pleistocene and Neogene clastics (Figures 3a, e, Figure 4). These “rims” of marine limestone and subsequent gypsum were followed by today’s drawdown saline-pan halite-dominant hydrology (Figures 4, 7a-c). The current hydrological package of sediments encompassing the current drawdown episode lies atop and postdates the Pleistocene potash-hosting Lower Halite Formation in the depression and is probably equivalent to the uppermost part of the clastic overburden facies, as illustrated in the drilled and cored portions of the depression stratigraphy. As we shall discuss in the next blog, only the uppermost portion of the recovered core stratigraphy has equivalents in current depression hydrology (Figure 6). 


    In earlier work, some authors interpreted the fringing belts, especially the exposed coralgal reef belt, as being possibly of Pliocene or even Miocene age. However, when one looks at the stratiform nature of the outcrop trace of both the reef belt and the gypsum belt, and the carapace nature of its depositional boundaries in the field, it is immediately apparent they must be younger (Figure 5a, c; Figure 7). Both the reefal and gypsum belts track horizontal hydrological intersections with the landscape, in what is an ongoing volcanogenic and tectonically active depression. When the reefal belt image is overlain by a DEM it shows the reef belt is consistently at sea level (Figure 1c). If the outcrops of the reef belt and the gypsum pavement were older than late Pleistocene or Holocene, then ongoing episodes of tectonism and volcanism would have modified the elevations of the two outcrop belts in the landscape, as is seen in Miocene redbed outcrops. These underlying and centripetal Miocene sections clearly show the influence of ongoing tilting and tectonism and hence why the flat-lying tops to the reef and gypsum belts imply a late Pleistocene-Holocene (Figure 5d).

    That is, the topographic distribution of the top of the reef facies, which lies within a metre or two of current sea level, implies that the Danakil depression had a relatively recent connection to the Red Sea. The pristine preservation of aragonitic corals and sand dollars in the adjacent marls suggest the connection was either related to the penultimate interglacial (around 104, 000 years ago) or to an early Holocene transgression into the depression. Bannert et al. (1970) assign a C14 age of 25.4-34.5 ka to this formation. However, we consider this is unlikely as DEM overlay levelling shows the reef rim, wherever it outcrops, lies within a meter of current sealevel. World eustacy clearly shows that sealevel was more than 50-60m below its present level some 25,000-30,000 years ago. A 25-35 ka determination of the reef rim would require the whole basin was subject to a single basinwide wide vertical uplift event that did not fragment or disturb the lateral elevation of the rim.

    The coralgal reef terrace indicates normal marine water were once present in the Dallol depression, while the occurrences of the stratiform gypsum pavement are consistent with a former arid lake hydrology at a somewhat lower elevation than the reef rim (Figures 1c, 5a). Like the reef rim, the gypsum pavement fringe defines a consistent elevation level or surface, most clearly visible along the western margin of the present salt flat. It is the result of gypsum deposition during a period of drawdown associated with brine level stability, subsequent to the isolation of the depression from its former “at-surface” marine connection. During this time gypsum accumulated as a stack of subaqueous aligned gypsum beds, along with a series of gypsiferous tufas and rhizoconcretions in zones about the more marginward spring-fed parts of the gypsiferous lake margin (Figure 7d-f). The evolution from marine waters that deposited the reefs and adjacent echinoid-rich lagoonal marls at a higher level in the depression (the lit zone) into a more saline seepage-fed system, with no ongoing marine surface connection to the Red Sea is indicated by the diagenetic growth of large lenticular (“bird’s-beak”) gypsum crystals within the marine marls and the dominant subqueous bottom-nucleated textures in the gypsum beds. In a similar way, the now-outcropping subaqueous-gypsum drawdown rim deposits, located at higher elevations than current saline pan levels typify other drawdown saline lakes in the Afar region, such as Lake Asal in Djibouti, all such occurrences indicate an earlier, somewhat less saline, hydrological equilibrium level (Warren, 2015).


    Active today is the lowest parts of the Dallol saltflat is an ephemeral saltpan hydrology indicated by bedded salt crusts dominated by megapolygonal crusts made up of aligned-chevron halite stacks separated by mm-cm thick mud layers . This current pan hydrology is associated with even greater drawdown levels compared to the former gypsum-dominant hydrology (Figure 8). Current deposits, made up a series of stacked brine-pan salt sheets,  are still quarried as a renewable resource by the local tribesmen (Figure 3). These modern brine flats accumulate pan halite whenever the Lake Assele brine edge (strandline) is periodically blown back and forth over the modern brineflat. It driven by southerly winds, which are frequent in the annual weather cycle, and can move thin sheets of brine kilometres across the pan in a few hours (Figure 1a, Figure 8). Superimposed on this southerly supply of brine is an occasional land-derived sheetflood event, driven by rare rainstorms and the deposition of silt-mud layers from water sheets sourced from the adjacent wadi belt. This ephemeral brineflat hydrology is stable with respect to the current climate (groundwater inflow ≈ outflow). It means the current brineflat of the northern Danakil low is  accumulating bedded pan salt at an even lower topographic level in the basin than the surrounding gypsum pavement, so implying today’s halite-dominant pan beds form under more arid conditions (less humid, more drawndown) than that of the gypsum pavement.


    This stepped (reef to gypsum to halite) late-Pleistocene-early Holocene hydrology, captured in the modern surficial geology of the Dallol Depression, likely postdates a somewhat wetter (humid) climatic period indicated by the widespread deposition of a clastic overburden unit, atop the Upper Halite Formation (UHF; Figure 6). That is, the modern hydrology in present-day Lake Assale, and the adjacent saline mud flats of the Dallol pan, is not the same hydrology as that which precipitated the massive salt of the Upper Halite Formation (UHF). A potash-free halite unit extensively cored beneath the present clastic-dominated saline pan (to be discussed in the next blog). Texturally and hydrologically the depositional system of stacked salt crusts, which dominates the upper part of the UHF in the cored wells, is similar to today's halite-dominated passage from the salt flat into the subaqueous Lake Assale. However, as we shall see, a wetter moister period, dominated by sheetfloods and higher amounts of clastics, separates the two hydrological events in all the cored wells. Today's outcrop geology of alternating saltpan and clastic beds are a different to marine-fed seepage hydrology formed the Lower Halite Formation (LHF), with its potash bittern cap (Houston Formation). 

    Most importantly there is no evidence of primary potash deposition in the modern lake/ pan hydrology of the Dallol saltflat. It is clear that the world-famous bedded potash (mostly kainitite) units of the Danakhil accumulated in a bittern hydrology that is not present in today's Dallol depositional hydrology (Blog 2). As we shall see, Holocene potash only occurs in the vicinity of the Dallol Volcanic Mound, where uplift has moved older, formerly buried, potash beds into a more active hydrothermal hydrology (Blog 3).

    References

    Bannert, D., J. Brinckmann, K. C. Käding, G. Knetsch, M. KÜrsten, and H. Mayrhofer, 1970, Zur Geologie der Danakil-Senke: Geologische Rundschau, v. 59, p. 409-443.

    Ercosplan, 2011, Resource Report for the Danakhil Potash Deposit, Afar State Ethiopia, comissioned by Allana Potash. Document EGB 11-008.

    Hardie, L. A., 1990, The roles of rifting and hydrothermal CaCl2 brines in the origin of potash evaporites: an hypothesis: American Journal of Science, v. 290, p. 43-106.

    Holwerda, J. G., and R. W. Hutchinson, 1968, Potash-bearing evaporites in the Danakil area, Ethiopia: Economic Geology, v. 63, p. 124-150.

    Hutchinson, R. W., and G. G. Engels, 1970, Tectonic significance of regional geology and evaporite lithofacies in northeastern Ethiopia: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, v. A 267, p. 313-329.

    Kebede, S., 2012, Groundwater in Ethiopia: Features, numbers and opportunities, Springer.

    Kottek, M., J. Grieser, C. Beck, B. Rudolf, and F. Rubel, 2006, World Map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification updated: Meteorologische Zeitschrift, v. 15, p. 259-263.

    Warren, J. K., 2010, Evaporites through time: Tectonic, climatic and eustatic controls in marine and nonmarine deposits: Earth-Science Reviews, v. 98, p. 217-268.

    Warren, J. K., 2015, Evaporites: A compendium (ISBN 978-3-319-13511-3) Released August 2015: Berlin, Springer, 1600 p.


    Recent Posts


    Tags

    halite-hosted cave rockburst silicified anhydrite nodules Calyptogena ponderosa intersalt salt ablation breccia 18O enrichment kainitite sedimentary copper solikamsk 2 hydrohalite Density log Platform evaporite hectorite Musley potash marine brine Deep seafloor hypersaline anoxic lake deep seafloor hypersaline anoxic basin nitrogen bischofite brine evolution Ingebright Lake Ripon SedEx vadose zone Kara bogaz gol venice alkaline lake waste storage in salt cavity snake-skin chert black salt Koppen climate evaporite MOP carnallitite deep meteoric potash Zabuye Lake namakier halokinetic evaporite-metal association Badenian mirabilite Dead Sea saltworks Hadley cell: sulphur basinwide evaporite Jefferson Island salt mine Gamma log salt tectonics chert Five Island salt dome trend McArthur River Pb-Zn water in modern-day Mars anthropogenically enhanced salt dissolution Muriate of potash base metal lunette Belle Isle salt mine lithium carbonate knistersalz seal capacity tachyhydrite Weeks Island salt mine hydrothermal karst York (Whitehall) Mine Quaternary climate dihedral angle mine stability mass die-back Red Sea doline auto-suture intrasalt potash ore Hell Kettle Neoproterozoic stevensite oil gusher lithium brine Pilbara Thiotrphic symbionts K2O from Gamma Log sinkhole halite lot's wife Hyperarid ancient climate Paleoproterozoic Oxygenation Event mummifiction DHAL potash ore price freefight lake Schoenite natural geohazard salt suture Koeppen Climate collapse doline evaporite dissolution hydrological indicator DHAB supercontinent Catalayud 13C enrichment source rock gypsum dune sulfate Neutron Log Neoproterozoic Oxygenation Event Lamellibrachia luymesi dissolution collapse doline saline clay 13C astrakanite methane CO2: albedo Dead Sea karst collapse evaporite karst salt leakage, dihedral angle, halite, halokinesis, salt flow, CaCl2 brine gas in salt causes of glaciation stable isotope Dead Sea caves NaSO4 salts zeolite carbon oxygen isotope cross plots bedded potash gem trona well logs in evaporites lapis lazuli authigenic silica MVT deposit capillary zone GR log anthropogenic potash vanished evaporite salt trade sulfur H2S eolian transport recurring slope lines (RSL) jadarite brine pan Lake Magadi geohazard perchlorate sepiolite Precambrian evaporites methanotrophic symbionts Salar de Atacama sulphate Mega-monsoon Bathymodiolus childressi flowing salt vestimentiferan siboglinids methanogenesis evaporite-hydrocarbon association lithium battery Boulby Mine hydrogen halotolerant sinjarite Sulphate of potash Ethiopia antarcticite salt seal wireline log interpretation NPHI log well blowout Great Salt Lake Pangaea crocodile skin chert Seepiophila jonesi carbon cycle gas outburst HYC Pb-Zn hydrothermal potash anomalous salt zones potash palygorskite Lomagundi Event Ure Terrace dark salt halophile Zaragoza organic matter Stebnik Potash nuclear waste storage cryogenic salt Proterozoic gassy salt Messinian well log interpretation water on Mars nacholite blowout Dallol saltpan Warrawoona Group Mesoproterozoic Stebnyk potash Karabogazgol Lake Peigneur silica solubility RHOB climate control on salt cauliflower chert Lop Nur Crescent potash Lop Nor High Magadi beds Realmonte potash Deep meta-evaporite endosymbiosis epsomite Sumo Evaporite-source rock association Archean magadiite Corocoro copper Kalush Potash solar concentrator pans sodium silicate extrasalt Danakhil Depression, Afar Atlantis II Deep African rift valley lakes salt karst 18O circum-Atlantic Salt Basins Turkmenistan North Pole subsidence basin salt periphery salt mine SOP brine lake edge CO2 allo-suture Magdalen's Road Clayton Valley playa: lazurite

    Archive